Jump to content


Dont Replace Obj 263


  • Please log in to reply
23 replies to this topic

Poll: Should the Obj 263 Stay Teir 10? (54 members have cast votes)

You have to complete 250 battles in order to participate this poll.

Should the Obj 263 Stay Teir 10?

  1. Yes (47 votes [87.04%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 87.04%

  2. No (4 votes [7.41%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 7.41%

  3. Dont Mind (3 votes [5.56%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 5.56%

Vote Hide poll

DatGuy135 #1 Posted 02 December 2017 - 12:23 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 16571 battles
  • 67
  • [TFUK3] TFUK3
  • Member since:
    05-27-2015

I understand that your not removing it but putting it with nerfed stats at teir 9, but your putting ANOTHER 750 alpha derp TD at teir 10! I think majority of people would agree that the 263 should remain at teir 10 as it was such an Iconic TD! 

 

( https://thedailyboun...ch-new-changes/ )

 


Edited by DatGuy135, 02 December 2017 - 12:52 PM.


Gionnbharra #2 Posted 02 December 2017 - 12:24 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 14159 battles
  • 6
  • [TFUK] TFUK
  • Member since:
    10-23-2017

 

it may have a genric tier 10 gun but ifit has the same dpm yes pls



DatGuy135 #3 Posted 02 December 2017 - 12:27 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 16571 battles
  • 67
  • [TFUK3] TFUK3
  • Member since:
    05-27-2015

View PostGionnbharra, on 02 December 2017 - 12:24 PM, said:

 

it may have a genric tier 10 gun but ifit has the same dpm yes pls

 

Here are the stats : https://thedailyboun...sion-4-changes/ .

 

927.09 Less DPM.



RamRaid90 #4 Posted 02 December 2017 - 12:32 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 21532 battles
  • 6,496
  • [D0NG] D0NG
  • Member since:
    12-14-2014

So you came to the forums, to bring up old news. Regarding changes to a tank that you don't even own, on a tech tree line you haven't even played?

 

#Forumlogic.



The_Georgian_One #5 Posted 02 December 2017 - 12:33 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 36780 battles
  • 1,618
  • [KOFN] KOFN
  • Member since:
    01-05-2015
So they are kicking out SU-122-54 as of now, which was suggested by a few people on this forum, which is fine. Why they're not replacing it with historical version of 268 ver 4 is beyond me...

They could do that and leave 263 as it is...

DatGuy135 #6 Posted 02 December 2017 - 12:34 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 16571 battles
  • 67
  • [TFUK3] TFUK3
  • Member since:
    05-27-2015

View PostRamRaid90, on 02 December 2017 - 12:32 PM, said:

So you came to the forums, to bring up old news. Regarding changes to a tank that you don't even own, on a tech tree line you haven't even played?

 

#Forumlogic.

 

Got to tier 6. In progress of trying to get it.

Gionnbharra #7 Posted 02 December 2017 - 12:34 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 14159 battles
  • 6
  • [TFUK] TFUK
  • Member since:
    10-23-2017

View PostRamRaid90, on 02 December 2017 - 12:32 PM, said:

So you came to the forums, to bring up old news. Regarding changes to a tank that you don't even own, on a tech tree line you haven't even played?

 

#Forumlogic.

 

just have to get your stats in there

 



Gionnbharra #8 Posted 02 December 2017 - 12:35 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 14159 battles
  • 6
  • [TFUK] TFUK
  • Member since:
    10-23-2017

what they should really do is intorduce the wtf e100 back from 8.17

 



DatGuy135 #9 Posted 02 December 2017 - 12:37 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 16571 battles
  • 67
  • [TFUK3] TFUK3
  • Member since:
    05-27-2015

View PostGionnbharra, on 02 December 2017 - 12:35 PM, said:

what they should really do is intorduce the wtf e100 back from 8.17

 

 

Already have : Foch B

fighting_falcon93 #10 Posted 02 December 2017 - 12:42 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 31233 battles
  • 3,928
  • Member since:
    02-05-2013

Voted "yes", it should remain on tier 10. WG needs to realise that players invest months of grinding to unlock new tier 10s, and then suddenly in the middle of the grind WG just swaps it for something entirely different. That's highly frustrating and not nice at all. And if it atleast would make the line more consistent, but it will not, because the inconsistent tank is the SU-122-54, NOT the Obj.263.

 

And 2 more things:

 

1. @DatGuy135: Please limit the poll to 1 alternative before people like jabster drops in and vote for all 3 alternatives.

 

2. It would be nice if the clowns voting "no" or "don't care" could explain how they think. The Obj.263 is unique and consistent, why the hell would you want to replace it with another dumb boomstick? Just to mess with players or what?



RamRaid90 #11 Posted 02 December 2017 - 12:47 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 21532 battles
  • 6,496
  • [D0NG] D0NG
  • Member since:
    12-14-2014

View PostGionnbharra, on 02 December 2017 - 11:34 AM, said:

 

just have to get your stats in there

 

 

What has this got to do with stats?

 

But if you want to mention them, try another re-roll that one hasn't worked out for you :)



Uebergewicht #12 Posted 02 December 2017 - 12:55 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 11702 battles
  • 1,062
  • Member since:
    11-15-2015
They really continiue with this stupid suggestion? And they´re not even changing any stats of the tier 9 and 10, which were the most bullcrap of them all? Come on now! I dont want a freackin noob friendly 263 at tier 9, the tank is fine is it is! And screw that horrible slug that is the 268/4!

Cobra6 #13 Posted 02 December 2017 - 01:09 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 16332 battles
  • 15,772
  • [RGT] RGT
  • Member since:
    09-17-2010

Yes, keep it at tier 10 and make the new proposed T10 TD a second branch off from the SU-122-54 at tier 9.

 

Cobra 6



fighting_falcon93 #14 Posted 02 December 2017 - 01:10 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 31233 battles
  • 3,928
  • Member since:
    02-05-2013

View PostUebergewicht, on 02 December 2017 - 12:55 PM, said:

They really continiue with this stupid suggestion? And they´re not even changing any stats of the tier 9 and 10, which were the most bullcrap of them all? Come on now! I dont want a freackin noob friendly 263 at tier 9, the tank is fine is it is! And screw that horrible slug that is the 268/4!

 

From what I've heard there's an even bigger sh!tstorm about it on RU, but it seems WG is just ignoring it completely and proceeding with the changes.

Like WTF and then they say "we listen to our players feedback" :facepalm:

 

Hello?!?! WG?!?! ANSWER PLEASE?!?!



luumu #15 Posted 02 December 2017 - 01:29 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 42423 battles
  • 69
  • Member since:
    07-08-2011
What sort of a gun arc does 268v4 has? Havnt seen stats anywhere.

basin79 #16 Posted 02 December 2017 - 01:36 PM

    General

  • Player
  • 15351 battles
  • 8,703
  • Member since:
    03-13-2012
WG meeting.

"So the Obj 263 is a unique tier 10 TD isn't it?".

Is it?

"Well yes, it relies on the DPM rather than 750 alpha and getting stuck in, not camping at the red line".

I see. So it doesn't have 750 alpha?

"No. Like I said. It's unique".

Right. Well I'll make a note of that and get it dropped to tier 9. Nerfed of course and get a 750 alpha TD in its place.

nooby1337 #17 Posted 02 December 2017 - 01:47 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 24521 battles
  • 57
  • Member since:
    01-26-2012
It should definitely stay, we don't need another 750 damage boring tier 10 TD.

DatGuy135 #18 Posted 02 December 2017 - 01:58 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 16571 battles
  • 67
  • [TFUK3] TFUK3
  • Member since:
    05-27-2015

View Postluumu, on 02 December 2017 - 01:29 PM, said:

What sort of a gun arc does 268v4 has? Havnt seen stats anywhere.

 

 

(sourced from https://thedailyboun...branch-changes/)


Edited by DatGuy135, 02 December 2017 - 01:58 PM.


fighting_falcon93 #19 Posted 02 December 2017 - 04:10 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 31233 battles
  • 3,928
  • Member since:
    02-05-2013

View Postbasin79, on 02 December 2017 - 01:36 PM, said:

WG meeting.

 

Best read with Russian accent:

 

[Important meeting in WG HQ]

 

– “Privet tavarushki! We haf big prublem... SU-122-54 tenk destroyr is inconsistent...”

– “Where is Dmitry?”

– “He recovering frum yestrday vodka party. It wuz nice day if I am honest...”

– “Ok, so Ivan you fix this problem, da?”
– “Ehhh ya, maybe we replace Obj.263, why not?”
– “Oh da da, that iz great! Open vodka, we need celebrate zuper idea!!!”

 

[5 hours later]

 

– “Eh Ivan? Stop sleepink we need to make work!”

– “Euhm ehhh zzzzzzzzz”

– “Cyka blyat I cume to you and wake you...”

 



Uebergewicht #20 Posted 02 December 2017 - 04:42 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 11702 battles
  • 1,062
  • Member since:
    11-15-2015
"Fixing" the consistency of this line by adding a new tier 10 which lacks a prime feature of the line - low alpha high dpm gun - is just completely senseless. They´re also making the guns derpy as hell... if I wanted derpy guns, I´d have grinded the other Russian TD line. What they´re planning to do with the 263 is unbelievable, gimped gun handling and dpm... can you at least let us keep the current 263 as a special vehicle and rename the new one 263 V2 or something? I mean, there are plenty of other, way better fixes people proposed, but please give us something?




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users