Jump to content


T44 ltwt updated stats


  • Please log in to reply
22 replies to this topic

TheWarrener #1 Posted 04 December 2017 - 08:10 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 2244 battles
  • 334
  • Member since:
    10-31-2017

Alpha Damage: 180 / 180 / 300
Penetration:  182 / 210 / 44 mm
Rate of fire: 13,036 rounds/minute
Damage per minute: 2 346,4
Reload time: 4,603 s
Accuracy at 100 m: 0,384
Aiming time: 1,82 s
Depression/Elevation: -5 / +20

Source:

https://thearmoredpa...44-lightweight/

It seems like we got ourselves a pretty competitive tier 8 lt that is not a 41 90 GF. Any chance of it being a part of advent calendar? 



lafeel #2 Posted 04 December 2017 - 08:37 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 4964 battles
  • 1,503
  • [LAFIE] LAFIE
  • Member since:
    03-13-2011

View PostTheWarrener, on 04 December 2017 - 07:10 PM, said:

Alpha Damage: 180 / 180 / 300
Penetration:  182 / 210 / 44 mm
Rate of fire: 13,036 rounds/minute
Damage per minute: 2 346,4
Reload time: 4,603 s
Accuracy at 100 m: 0,384
Aiming time: 1,82 s
Depression/Elevation: -5 / +20

Source:

https://thearmoredpa...44-lightweight/

It seems like we got ourselves a pretty competitive tier 8 lt that is not a 41 90 GF. Any chance of it being a part of advent calendar? 

 

It is always a possibility, given that there are some bits in the calendar that have not (yet) been identified.

JakeRoook #3 Posted 04 December 2017 - 08:59 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 260 battles
  • 271
  • Member since:
    04-20-2013
Is it joke? Ah its WG

Aikl #4 Posted 04 December 2017 - 09:03 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 25163 battles
  • 4,238
  • [-MM] -MM
  • Member since:
    04-13-2011

View PostTheWarrener, on 04 December 2017 - 07:10 PM, said:

(...)

It seems like we got ourselves a pretty competitive tier 8 lt that is not a 41 90 GF. Any chance of it being a part of advent calendar? 

 

Doubtful, both the 44-Lightweight and ELC Uneven are too fresh out of Supertest. Spacing out the newcomers make a lot of sense anyway if you want players to buy them.

 

Probably a decent alternative to creditgrinding-by-bushfapping. 210mm APCR is a nice joke, though. Basically premium shell velocity at that point.



8126Jakobsson #5 Posted 04 December 2017 - 09:12 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 61962 battles
  • 2,921
  • Member since:
    12-20-2014
Not feeling -5 dep' on a light. Gotta sneek and peek on all kinds of places, you know. 

TheWarrener #6 Posted 04 December 2017 - 10:28 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 2244 battles
  • 334
  • Member since:
    10-31-2017

View Post8126Jakobsson, on 04 December 2017 - 09:12 PM, said:

Not feeling -5 dep' on a light. Gotta sneek and peek on all kinds of places, you know. 

Well your choice is that or 1300 dpm 2.7sec aimtime ELC joke 90. 

View PostAikl, on 04 December 2017 - 09:03 PM, said:

210mm APCR is a nice joke, though. Basically premium shell velocity at that point.

Compared to 5600 credits 210 HEAT pen 150 dmg rounds from t92 this one is quite luxurious! 



8126Jakobsson #7 Posted 04 December 2017 - 10:45 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 61962 battles
  • 2,921
  • Member since:
    12-20-2014

View PostTheWarrener, on 04 December 2017 - 10:28 PM, said:

Well your choice is that or 1300 dpm 2.7sec aimtime ELC joke 90. 

 

That tiny speedster seems to be so ridiculous that I would be interested even if it came without a gun. :D



Aikl #8 Posted 04 December 2017 - 11:10 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 25163 battles
  • 4,238
  • [-MM] -MM
  • Member since:
    04-13-2011

View PostTheWarrener, on 04 December 2017 - 09:28 PM, said:

(...)
Compared to 5600 credits 210 HEAT pen 150 dmg rounds from t92 this one is quite luxurious! 

 

At first glance, at least.  Depends on how the dropoff is. Trend for even the T9 lights seem to be about 20-25mm at 500m (T92 has 2mm at 500m, for unknown reasons), and the lack of normalization means the effective pen should be a fair bit less than 210mm, even close-up (unless you can get the effective angle practically dead flat). Not sure exactly how much, but 230-ish APCR is inferior to 215mm-pen AP.

(There's always the possibility that the APCR round has T92-ish dropoff, in which case it's clearly superior.)



leggasiini #9 Posted 04 December 2017 - 11:30 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 11496 battles
  • 6,011
  • [-GLO-] -GLO-
  • Member since:
    12-01-2012
It needed one; It seemed very underwhelming with its first stats tbh

ExclamationMark #10 Posted 04 December 2017 - 11:37 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 16679 battles
  • 3,727
  • Member since:
    04-12-2013

View PostTheWarrener, on 04 December 2017 - 08:10 PM, said:

Any chance of it being a part of advent calendar? 

 

Doubt it, those are supertest stats. If it was CT, I'd say yes.

MetaCube63 #11 Posted 05 December 2017 - 09:56 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 5888 battles
  • 48
  • [LICS] LICS
  • Member since:
    10-14-2016
Hope it will get the same buffs that T44 :P

LeGod7 #12 Posted 05 December 2017 - 10:03 AM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 706 battles
  • 162
  • Member since:
    12-24-2014
Bit odd it gets that level of DPM, whilst the T92 with less pen and alpha only gets 2k 

Aikl #13 Posted 05 December 2017 - 10:16 AM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 25163 battles
  • 4,238
  • [-MM] -MM
  • Member since:
    04-13-2011

View PostLeGod7, on 05 December 2017 - 09:03 AM, said:

Bit odd it gets that level of DPM, whilst the T92 with less pen and alpha only gets 2k 

 

A bit odd indeed; seems like it'll be straight-up superior to the LTTB - which is rather similar in terms of gun and armor. Higher DPM for less gun depression is probably a balancing feature when comparing to the T92, though.

Cobra6 #14 Posted 05 December 2017 - 10:35 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 16305 battles
  • 15,265
  • [RGT] RGT
  • Member since:
    09-17-2010

Yeah it's kind of funny how the Rasja light gets more pen, DPM and alpha than the T92 *AND* more armour for a slightly worse P/W.

 

If anything this T-44 should be the standard tank and the LTTB should be a premium if you ask me, but oh well.

 

Honestly I wish they'd give all T8 light tanks between 2300 and 2500 DPM especially the low alpha ones.

 

Cobra 6


Edited by Cobra6, 05 December 2017 - 10:38 AM.


Dr_Oolen #15 Posted 05 December 2017 - 10:36 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 20348 battles
  • 1,516
  • [IDEAL] IDEAL
  • Member since:
    03-13-2012

Sure looks better than t92 and is better than lttb and regular bulldog and bc12t. Still worse than wz132 and gf. All things considered id say it should be relatively good t8 prem light tonk. But then again, overall still bad for a t8 tank.

 

WG could literally go and buff dpm of all t8 lights (except for gf) by 20% and buff pen on all of them to be 185+ ap or 195+ apcr and buff gold to be 230+ on all of them and most of the issues would suddenly be fixed. That said they could do the same with meds, except there they could just buff pen to 205+ for all the non special mm ones while still buffing the dpm by 10-15%.


Edited by Dr_Oolen, 05 December 2017 - 10:37 AM.


THE_JACK_OF_HEARTS #16 Posted 05 December 2017 - 03:11 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 9476 battles
  • 908
  • Member since:
    02-04-2015
so cobra. If it comes out is it #walletopen ???.

Balc0ra #17 Posted 05 December 2017 - 03:22 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 63714 battles
  • 14,974
  • [WALL] WALL
  • Member since:
    07-10-2012

View PostAikl, on 04 December 2017 - 09:03 PM, said:

 

Doubtful, both the 44-Lightweight and ELC Uneven are too fresh out of Supertest. Spacing out the newcomers make a lot of sense anyway if you want players to buy them.

 

ELC will be added to the client when the next patch arrives next week. With time to spare to get into the calendar. Tho not a word yet if the 44 will be added then to make it.

Cobra6 #18 Posted 06 December 2017 - 10:25 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 16305 battles
  • 15,265
  • [RGT] RGT
  • Member since:
    09-17-2010

View PostTHE_JACK_OF_HEARTS, on 05 December 2017 - 02:11 PM, said:

so cobra. If it comes out is it #walletopen ???.

 

Haven't decided yet, it's basically the old WZ-131 kind of tank but it's just another Russian medium clone that looks boring.

Not really actively grinding the RU light line anyway but do like to play the LTTB because of the mobility.....

 

So still on the fence, maybe if they increase the hp/t ratio to be a bit more.

 

All that being said, unless they sell the either the Type62 or AMX 13 57 in the advent calendar it's #WalletClosed anyway.

 

Cobra 6



TheWarrener #19 Posted 06 December 2017 - 10:43 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 2244 battles
  • 334
  • Member since:
    10-31-2017

View PostCobra6, on 06 December 2017 - 10:25 AM, said:

 

Haven't decided yet, it's basically the old WZ-131 kind of tank(...) 

That's pretty much enough to open mine. 9.18 update took away 2 of my favorite tanks: wz131 and Sp1c. T44 ltwt seems to fill a gap left by WZ and Sp1c... Well, it returned from the dead in highly retarded form of ELC joke90



dennez #20 Posted 06 December 2017 - 11:09 AM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 16750 battles
  • 4,755
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    02-26-2013

View PostTheWarrener, on 06 December 2017 - 10:43 AM, said:

That's pretty much enough to open mine. 9.18 update took away 2 of my favorite tanks: wz131 and Sp1c. T44 ltwt seems to fill a gap left by WZ and Sp1c... Well, it returned from the dead in highly retarded form of ELC joke90

 

WZ-131 is still a good tank tbh.. Its not OP-ish like the T71's, but imo still the 2nd best T7 light.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users