Jump to content


Average experience delusion

premium account dependency

  • Please log in to reply
42 replies to this topic

JakeRoook #1 Posted 04 December 2017 - 08:39 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 260 battles
  • 271
  • Member since:
    04-20-2013

How many of you still think that average experience from both ingame achievements and official wot site with its ratings is dependant of premium account.

It isnt possible to get lets say ~999 average experience by playing without premium account. Your average experience will be ~666 that way. (666+666/2)

So what players think about fact that WG is literally and directly selling one of their main statistics? Do you know it when you look and evaluate someones stats for any means?

 


Edited by JakeRoook, 04 December 2017 - 08:40 PM.


CmdPrompt #2 Posted 04 December 2017 - 08:43 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 30942 battles
  • 235
  • [B-D-O] B-D-O
  • Member since:
    05-19-2013

And that is why most people are judged by wn8 and not wgr

 



Shivva #3 Posted 04 December 2017 - 08:59 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 29634 battles
  • 1,955
  • [J_A_G] J_A_G
  • Member since:
    05-20-2012

View PostJakeRoook, on 04 December 2017 - 07:39 PM, said:

How many of you still think that average experience from both ingame achievements and official wot site with its ratings is dependant of premium account.

It isnt possible to get lets say ~999 average experience by playing without premium account. Your average experience will be ~666 that way. (666+666/2)

So what players think about fact that WG is literally and directly selling one of their main statistics? Do you know it when you look and evaluate someones stats for any means?

 

 

yeah first thing I've always looked for was folks avg xp.... lol what a spanner.

Junglist_ #4 Posted 04 December 2017 - 10:34 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 35992 battles
  • 1,332
  • Member since:
    06-17-2013

Russia rating > all other ratings



Consett_Steel #5 Posted 04 December 2017 - 10:40 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 17327 battles
  • 534
  • Member since:
    08-18-2012

View PostJakeRoook, on 04 December 2017 - 07:39 PM, said:

How many of you still think that average experience from both ingame achievements and official wot site with its ratings is dependant of premium account.

It isnt possible to get lets say ~999 average experience by playing without premium account. Your average experience will be ~666 that way. (666+666/2)

So what players think about fact that WG is literally and directly selling one of their main statistics? Do you know it when you look and evaluate someones stats for any means?

 

 

More importantly, how many of us give a toss?



MrEdweird #6 Posted 04 December 2017 - 11:01 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 19348 battles
  • 269
  • [CIRC2] CIRC2
  • Member since:
    08-19-2011

View PostJakeRoook, on 04 December 2017 - 07:39 PM, said:

How many of you still think that average experience from both ingame achievements and official wot site with its ratings is dependant of premium account.

It isnt possible to get lets say ~999 average experience by playing without premium account. Your average experience will be ~666 that way. (666+666/2)

So what players think about fact that WG is literally and directly selling one of their main statistics? Do you know it when you look and evaluate someones stats for any means?

 

 

I don't really care, but it should be base XP, not total XP earned for battle. You're saying it isn't?

JakeRoook #7 Posted 04 December 2017 - 11:19 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 260 battles
  • 271
  • Member since:
    04-20-2013

View PostConsett_Steel, on 04 December 2017 - 09:40 PM, said:

 

More importantly, how many of us give a toss?

 

I bet there are players who judge someones stats without knowing this fact.

CmdRatScabies #8 Posted 04 December 2017 - 11:20 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 35870 battles
  • 3,813
  • [-MM] -MM
  • Member since:
    10-12-2015
qpranger likes this

commer #9 Posted 04 December 2017 - 11:43 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 38081 battles
  • 1,995
  • Member since:
    06-14-2011
What matters is Solo win rate. If you can't separate solo then DPG + SPG + KPG + WR plus you see on what tanks. 

Anxter_ #10 Posted 04 December 2017 - 11:49 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 26589 battles
  • 250
  • [-MM] -MM
  • Member since:
    10-12-2012

Everyone knows and nobody cares because XP is meaningless as a performance indicator anyway and WGs ingame rating has never been anything but trash. 

 

WN8, your rush rating *edit and XP all have one thing in common. If you need to know a players performance you'll just look at their winrate, DPG and spots rather than some metric that can be padded and has a vague meaning. The concept behind wn8 was nice, but as with any such rating people started padding it by doing stupid craplike play 4k ELC battles and it lost all its meaning to the point where only a thorough look at someone's stats can give any reasonably accurate estimation of how they play.


Edited by Jbnn, 05 December 2017 - 09:41 AM.
This post has been edited by the moderation team due to inappropriate remarks.


JakeRoook #11 Posted 05 December 2017 - 12:02 AM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 260 battles
  • 271
  • Member since:
    04-20-2013

View Postcommer, on 04 December 2017 - 10:43 PM, said:

If you can't separate solo

 

If you know better way to do it than bia and cc medal amounts per battle just name it.

Edited by JakeRoook, 05 December 2017 - 12:03 AM.


_EXODUZ_ #12 Posted 05 December 2017 - 12:04 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 34635 battles
  • 1,936
  • [RGT] RGT
  • Member since:
    11-05-2014

View PostJakeRoook, on 05 December 2017 - 12:02 AM, said:

 

If you know better way to do it than bia and cc medal amounts per battle just name it.

 

BIA medals are pointless now, everyone learned to rig them at the end of the battle. I keep getting dynamic platoon invites when I have 3 kills, so why not.

Pvt_Duffer #13 Posted 05 December 2017 - 12:21 AM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 16653 battles
  • 3,144
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    05-11-2011

Say what?

 

Sorry I was sleep near here, or something..

 

Have you learnt PHP yet?

 

.



kaneloon #14 Posted 05 December 2017 - 12:38 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 27362 battles
  • 1,273
  • [OBLIC] OBLIC
  • Member since:
    11-18-2011
Average xp is what tells you if someone plays prem account or not : 450 is not, 650 is yes.

JakeRoook #15 Posted 05 December 2017 - 01:01 AM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 260 battles
  • 271
  • Member since:
    04-20-2013

View Post_EXODUZ_, on 04 December 2017 - 11:04 PM, said:

 

BIA medals are pointless now, everyone learned to rig them at the end of the battle. I keep getting dynamic platoon invites when I have 3 kills, so why not.
 

thats why you accept invite only for personal missions, not for rigging and not for bad of your solo winrate

 


Edited by JakeRoook, 07 December 2017 - 04:35 AM.


Jigabachi #16 Posted 05 December 2017 - 01:14 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 17858 battles
  • 18,542
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    08-12-2011
I actually came across quite a few people who called me a noob for having worse average exp and damage. I then asked them about the other stats, which were all much better than theirs, but then they went complete tomatorage.
Bottomline: Don't expect a tomato to understand basic math.

Also, this is just another pseudo trollthread. And a boring one on top. Can't you just go back to talking random nonsense about Sleipnir and stuff? That was borderline entertaining at least..


Phobos4321 #17 Posted 05 December 2017 - 05:57 AM

    General

  • Player
  • 43102 battles
  • 8,217
  • Member since:
    09-27-2011
and i thought they would rate you by the amount of blood you got in your alc. circulation ...

Strappster #18 Posted 05 December 2017 - 06:44 AM

    General

  • Player
  • 23695 battles
  • 8,926
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    10-20-2015
First of all I ask them for their ASL, then what they're wearing.

Joggaman #19 Posted 05 December 2017 - 07:12 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 23048 battles
  • 6,038
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    05-23-2011

I'm developing my own Rasta-Rating. 

 

Edit:

As a hard-working executive commander doing a recruiters job, I'm SOOO glad we (The Dingers) don't care about stats. I can't remember the last time I checked the stats of a potential recruit. What I do, however, is checking his/her posting history to make sure he/she is not a total pancake...

 


Edited by Joggaman, 05 December 2017 - 07:19 AM.


Strappster #20 Posted 05 December 2017 - 08:43 AM

    General

  • Player
  • 23695 battles
  • 8,926
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    10-20-2015

View PostJoggaman, on 05 December 2017 - 06:12 AM, said:

I'm developing my own Rasta-Rating. 

 

I quite like penne and fusilli can be quite nice in a bake but call me a traditionalist, tagliatelle or a simple spaghetti is hard to beat.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Oh, wait ... Rasta ... :unsure:







Also tagged with premium account, dependency

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users