Jump to content


Devs revenge on forum whiners.


  • Please log in to reply
21 replies to this topic

cragarion #1 Posted 07 December 2017 - 03:40 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Beta Tester
  • 40454 battles
  • 1,851
  • Member since:
    07-10-2010

Have you noticed how the devs get their revenge on the forum whiners complaining about premium tanks being op,

 

T26e5 Patriot,

complained it was op so they brought out the better armoured,

AMX M4-49 Liberte, 

complained it was op so they brought out the better armoured,

Chrysler K GF

complained it was op so they are now bringing out the better armoured,

Vk168.01 Mauerbrecher

 

Every time you all complain about the premium tanks being op they bring an even more powerful one out :facepalm:

 

 



Ceeb #2 Posted 07 December 2017 - 03:42 PM

    Brigadier

  • Beta Tester
  • 28072 battles
  • 4,583
  • [BULL] BULL
  • Member since:
    01-14-2011

Don't find the Chrysler K GF OP at all,

 

Source : - Based on how many I seem to kill



ortega456 #3 Posted 07 December 2017 - 03:46 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 54527 battles
  • 818
  • Member since:
    06-08-2012

Looking forward for the devs to play the kv-5 with its 167mm pen. Havent touched it for a long time but smm doesn't work if you can't pen tier 8 tanks at all.

 

God so greedy and not listening to playerbase about core gameplay elements. Lots of stuff doesn't make sence but they do it anyways because their business guys tell them how to maximize revenue.

 

Does that ring a bell? No? Then read up about the EA - Battlefront 2 debacle and what happens if you try to squeeze the last cent of a cow and suddenly wonder why the player numbers are declining. Though WoT is still away from that point the atmosphere will change at a certain point.



LeGod7 #4 Posted 07 December 2017 - 03:46 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 618 battles
  • 162
  • Member since:
    12-24-2014

Block Quote

 Vk168.01 Mauerbrecher

 

Yeh except that is going to be crap and has more weakspots than old tanks had. 



Dava_117 #5 Posted 07 December 2017 - 04:12 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 14588 battles
  • 1,006
  • [B-BAS] B-BAS
  • Member since:
    12-17-2014
This one would be very different. It has weackspot, so every good player will be able to take it down, as it should be.

etody77 #6 Posted 10 December 2017 - 03:54 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 53766 battles
  • 499
  • [PT-RO] PT-RO
  • Member since:
    09-12-2015
So, Cn i complain about T34? Is op with this standard pen 248 at tier8:) But, if i can, i change this gun for a little moreaccuracy or armour

Balc0ra #7 Posted 10 December 2017 - 04:25 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 58614 battles
  • 11,963
  • [WALL] WALL
  • Member since:
    07-10-2012

Most premiums even before those listed got "OP whine" topics before they arrived. Heck they did that about the IS-3A, as with the Chrysler K. It took 2 weeks before most found out it was actually crap. Just like the Foch B whiners before it arrived. It died out rater fast tbh. Not seen one in ages. Then again the whining did make WG see their mistake with regards to the Defender.

 

Libererte is not OP either as such. The few that did complain about it, compared it to the 50 100 armor. As most rather complain that that tank is how the Tiger II should be vs it being OP. And now with the new French HT's, it will fit in better. Only one they really nag about is the Patriot. And understandably so, as that's not really comparable to anything.  I suspect the Vk168.01 will be under powered.. well vs the VK.100.01 that is.

 

And the tier 8 premiums of late are actually balanced like the CDA 105, or under powered like T92. So I suspect they did listen to the whining, and got to careful again.

 

 

 

 



wsatnutter #8 Posted 10 December 2017 - 04:59 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Beta Tester
  • 23202 battles
  • 6,739
  • [WSAT] WSAT
  • Member since:
    08-25-2010

forum whiners really ? do they actually exist

sarcasm off



K_A #9 Posted 10 December 2017 - 05:04 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 13043 battles
  • 3,810
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    04-18-2013
The only sinsible whine about the Liberte is that it's just miles better in all aspects than the FCM, but that's not because the Liberte is OP, it's because the FCM has gotten seriously powercreeped over the years.

Spurtung #10 Posted 10 December 2017 - 05:05 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 56003 battles
  • 4,344
  • [UP-EU] UP-EU
  • Member since:
    07-05-2013

OP whining about whiners while providing an incompetent analogy that's flawed.

 

Celebrate diversity, I guess.



_EXODUZ_ #11 Posted 10 December 2017 - 05:11 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 29711 battles
  • 1,511
  • [RGT] RGT
  • Member since:
    11-05-2014

View PostSpurtung, on 10 December 2017 - 05:05 PM, said:

OP whining about whiners while providing an incompetent analogy that's flawed.

 

Celebrate diversity, I guess.

 

Last VK 168.01 thread didn't go so well, gotta try a new one. :great:

RamRaid90 #12 Posted 10 December 2017 - 05:23 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 17708 battles
  • 4,526
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    12-14-2014

168.01 from what anyone with a brain has seen seems fairly balanced.

 

Chrysler GF is just garbage.

 

And are you seriously suggesting the liberte is better than the patriot?

 

And of course your garbage troll thread missed out the only true overpowered premium tank in existence. The Defender.
 

So much fail, so little time.


Edited by RamRaid90, 10 December 2017 - 05:23 PM.


leggasiini #13 Posted 10 December 2017 - 05:25 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 4787 battles
  • 4,356
  • [-GLO-] -GLO-
  • Member since:
    12-01-2012

Did people actually whine about VK 168.01 being OP? Ehh? I don't see reason to call a massively nerfed VK 100.01 with hilarious 4.60 hp/ton with zero advantages over it overpowered, even if the VK 100.01 itself is quite OP. And I don't think anyone else thought about VK 168.01 being OP either.

 

I am pretty damn sure that they will buff the VK 168.01, though, just because the fact its clearly worse than its regular counterpart doesn't fit the WG's premium tank policy at all...or it does, if we lived in like 2014, but we are living in 2k17... Then again, I just hope they rather not release it (even if I kinda would like to get one) because while it probably needs a few buffs (at least to that stupidly low HP/ton), knowing WG, it would just get overbuffed into oblivion, and last thing we need is a OP as ball super-heavy Maus-style premium....



PoIestar #14 Posted 10 December 2017 - 05:31 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 29923 battles
  • 3,771
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    05-02-2013

View Postcragarion, on 07 December 2017 - 03:40 PM, said:

T26e5 Patriot,

complained it was op so they brought out the better armoured,

AMX M4-49 Liberte, 

complained it was op so they brought out the better armoured,

 

 

Liberte was introduced before Patriot, and tbh Patriot has better armor. And this is not a pattern, it's just plain retarded game developing. 



LCpl_Jones #15 Posted 10 December 2017 - 06:13 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 6047 battles
  • 232
  • Member since:
    06-17-2017
amusingly the OP thinks the devs read or care about the forum or even the EU server

etody77 #16 Posted 10 December 2017 - 07:49 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 53766 battles
  • 499
  • [PT-RO] PT-RO
  • Member since:
    09-12-2015
If a boss from staff tell todevs to create a better tier 8premium tank, they will do this. 

250swb #17 Posted 10 December 2017 - 10:13 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 18346 battles
  • 3,869
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    09-23-2015

View Postcragarion, on 07 December 2017 - 02:40 PM, said:

Every time you all complain about the premium tanks being op they bring an even more powerful one out :facepalm:

 

 

I'm sure it works with things other than just Premium tanks. So in your estimation who has been responsible for posting a lot of whine threads recently? 



Nishi_Kinuyo #18 Posted 10 December 2017 - 10:33 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 6541 battles
  • 2,669
  • [LEWD] LEWD
  • Member since:
    05-28-2011

Mauerbrecher: because even tier 6 MTs can pen its frontal weakspots.

So OP.



etody77 #19 Posted 11 December 2017 - 09:36 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 53766 battles
  • 499
  • [PT-RO] PT-RO
  • Member since:
    09-12-2015
T34, shooting after turning the turret is a matter of luck

TsundereWaffle #20 Posted 11 December 2017 - 09:47 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 23902 battles
  • 10,138
  • [LEWD] LEWD
  • Member since:
    03-31-2013
First of all, developers don’t read the forum, second, the stuff you say is simply not true, third, stop being stupid.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users