Jump to content


40%ers should never get to be top tier.

mm bobs

  • Please log in to reply
62 replies to this topic

komunistu33 #1 Posted 09 December 2017 - 12:34 AM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 7551 battles
  • 197
  • Member since:
    11-04-2013
Maybe this way they can eventually get past that WR and not drag the team down in top tier with their idiotic ideas. Just a thought.

zen_monk_ #2 Posted 09 December 2017 - 12:40 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Clan Diplomat
  • 25307 battles
  • 457
  • Member since:
    05-08-2011
Better kept to yourself.

Mav75 #3 Posted 09 December 2017 - 12:46 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 29437 battles
  • 1,471
  • [SXSE] SXSE
  • Member since:
    10-04-2013

It might not be polite, but...

 



HugSeal #4 Posted 09 December 2017 - 12:47 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 22717 battles
  • 1,952
  • [SWEC] SWEC
  • Member since:
    05-10-2012

Nah, people below 2k wn8 and 55% winrate shoul never get to be anything but botom tier. They should also pay for some of th eammo the superior players shoot, that way they have a good incentive to git gud. Any gane they lose when they don't do at least 75% of their hp in damage they should also get a 15 min ban.

 

Also, anyone having several < tier 6 tank in their ten most played sould automatically get +3 matchmaking so they get to try out higher tier gameplay from time to time.


Edited by HugSeal, 09 December 2017 - 12:50 AM.


Cassie_b #5 Posted 09 December 2017 - 12:58 AM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 3007 battles
  • 258
  • Member since:
    05-20-2016

Or how about simply limiting what tier tank you are allowed to play - based on your experience...?

 

For instance :

You can't play a t6 vehicle until you have unlocked 3 tier 6 vehicles...

Let people BUY them, but not PLAY them until you have the required experience at the previous tier.

 

Then maybe relax that a bit at higher tiers, seeing as it takes so much xp to unlock higher tiers...:

Oh, I dunno - maybe unlock TWO at tier 9 before you can play one (Then one at t10)



ExclamationMark #6 Posted 09 December 2017 - 02:45 AM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 16679 battles
  • 3,727
  • Member since:
    04-12-2013
Neither should 55% players.

Hedgehog1963 #7 Posted 09 December 2017 - 02:57 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 50154 battles
  • 6,921
  • [DIRTY] DIRTY
  • Member since:
    04-26-2011

View Postkomunistu33, on 08 December 2017 - 11:34 PM, said:

Maybe this way they can eventually get past that WR and not drag the team down in top tier with their idiotic ideas. Just a thought.

 

And who would be top tier in their place?  You?

 

I see this for what it is.



Bennie182 #8 Posted 09 December 2017 - 03:08 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 50369 battles
  • 1,091
  • Member since:
    03-13-2012

View PostCassie_b, on 09 December 2017 - 12:58 AM, said:

Or how about simply limiting what tier tank you are allowed to play - based on your experience...?

 

For instance :

You can't play a t6 vehicle until you have unlocked 3 tier 6 vehicles...

Let people BUY them, but not PLAY them until you have the required experience at the previous tier.

 

Then maybe relax that a bit at higher tiers, seeing as it takes so much xp to unlock higher tiers...:

Oh, I dunno - maybe unlock TWO at tier 9 before you can play one (Then one at t10)

Having played a certain amount of battles, doesn't mean that you have a clue what you're doing...

we have enough 45% etc players in higher tiers with 20k battles played, so your point doesn't make sense.



etody77 #9 Posted 09 December 2017 - 04:47 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 58466 battles
  • 644
  • [PT-RO] PT-RO
  • Member since:
    09-12-2015
And when your winrate and stats will dropp on high tier because you will fight against better players than you, you will have fun paying for defeats? Best solution is League for random battles, where players will fight against same stats players.

JocMeister #10 Posted 09 December 2017 - 06:22 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 20560 battles
  • 1,609
  • [-MM] -MM
  • Member since:
    08-03-2015

View PostExclamationMark, on 09 December 2017 - 02:45 AM, said:

Neither should 55% players.

 

Feelsbadman. :(

Schemezoid #11 Posted 09 December 2017 - 08:18 AM

    Major

  • Player
  • 20124 battles
  • 2,710
  • Member since:
    11-29-2013
Seeing loads of 45-46%ers lately.... Not sure if bots or something else wrong with them. Either way, Wg should investigate!

Pandabird #12 Posted 09 December 2017 - 08:21 AM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 33973 battles
  • 4,517
  • [KOFF] KOFF
  • Member since:
    05-19-2013
Counterproductive.
Loss in cash income guaranteed.
Request denied.

Homer_J #13 Posted 09 December 2017 - 09:01 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 27072 battles
  • 27,700
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    09-03-2010

View Postkomunistu33, on 08 December 2017 - 11:34 PM, said:

Maybe this way they can eventually get past that WR and not drag the team down in top tier with their idiotic ideas. Just a thought.

 

The flaw in that plan is that their win rate will rise and then they will be back being top tier.

 

So we need to use a different rating, and it has to be one approved by WG, so their personal rating will have to do.  I suggest anything below 7000 should never be top tier. :harp:



fester0911 #14 Posted 09 December 2017 - 09:17 AM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 17427 battles
  • 257
  • Member since:
    05-05-2013

uninstall XVM and your problem will go away. yours and every other stat winge with sand in there vagina.

 



jack_timber #15 Posted 09 December 2017 - 09:28 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 31180 battles
  • 1,604
  • Member since:
    07-26-2014

XVM this XVM that, stats this that and other. Remember folks some play just for the fun, that's how it's supposed to be isn't it?

 

 



Temid23 #16 Posted 09 December 2017 - 10:10 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 50822 battles
  • 627
  • [G-STR] G-STR
  • Member since:
    12-20-2013

View Postjack_timber, on 09 December 2017 - 09:28 AM, said:

XVM this XVM that, stats this that and other. Remember folks some play just for the fun, that's how it's supposed to be isn't it?

 

 

 

XVM/stats part: Sure ignore it it's a good idea.

Rest: Remember you are in a game with 14 unlucky players have 0 "fun" coz someone have his "fun".....



fester0911 #17 Posted 09 December 2017 - 10:22 AM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 17427 battles
  • 257
  • Member since:
    05-05-2013

View PostTemid23, on 09 December 2017 - 10:10 AM, said:

 

XVM/stats part: Sure ignore it it's a good idea.

Rest: Remember you are in a game with 14 unlucky players have 0 "fun" coz someone have his "fun".....

 

you do know its a game with random mm? Random dictates your gona get a knacker in at the top now and again. if that knacker has put in the time and unlocked a top tier tank said knacker has every right to play that tank. whats next premium tanks only to be sold to players with a > 1000 WN8? do you have a problem wen the oposition has a top tier knacker? probably not because you either win and forget about it or find another game parameter to blame for the loss

 



Bennie182 #18 Posted 09 December 2017 - 10:58 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 50369 battles
  • 1,091
  • Member since:
    03-13-2012

View Postjack_timber, on 09 December 2017 - 09:28 AM, said:

XVM this XVM that, stats this that and other. Remember folks some play just for the fun, that's how it's supposed to be isn't it?

you do realize that other people want to have fun as well, right? I don't have fun when I get trash players like that all the time on my team, screwing up, because they "only play for fun". I don't see how you can have fun, knowing that you piss off your allies because you barely play (either redline camp or suicide rush) and also get almost no damage per battle.

THIS is the problem with the community: they don't give a f**k about allies. why bother playing, right, when entering a team game?



malachi6 #19 Posted 09 December 2017 - 11:21 AM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 48623 battles
  • 3,088
  • Member since:
    04-14-2011
What is the phrase?  Better to remain silent and have people think you a fool?

Homer_J #20 Posted 09 December 2017 - 11:22 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 27072 battles
  • 27,700
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    09-03-2010

View PostBennie182, on 09 December 2017 - 09:58 AM, said:

you do realize that other people want to have fun as well, right? I don't have fun when I get trash players like that all the time on my team, screwing up, because they "only play for fun". 

Nobody forced you to play.  If it's no fun then stop.







Also tagged with mm, bobs

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users