Jump to content


Mines and ENSK


  • Please log in to reply
17 replies to this topic

SuperHick #1 Posted 11 December 2017 - 02:50 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 29662 battles
  • 43
  • Member since:
    03-01-2012
My opinion is that Mines and ENSK should be removed for higher tier tanks. Those two are way too small for high tiers.. What do you think comrades? Maps are ideal for tier V tier VI top.. VII VIII IX and X are pointless on those maps... :)

jack_timber #2 Posted 11 December 2017 - 02:53 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 31214 battles
  • 1,610
  • Member since:
    07-26-2014
Yes!

Iscoed1815 #3 Posted 11 December 2017 - 02:54 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 12756 battles
  • 75
  • [WDRGN] WDRGN
  • Member since:
    07-13-2015
Yep mines definitely, at higher tiers the hill can turn into a complete F**k fest, then you get HT's hull down either side of the centre, just plinking away at each other, plus one side is seriously over powered compared to the other.  Ensk's not too bad, at least it has some movement room.

tajj7 #4 Posted 11 December 2017 - 03:08 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 24373 battles
  • 13,836
  • [-MM] -MM
  • Member since:
    03-30-2014
This has been suggested for years, I can only presume the Russia server really likes these maps. 

djuro900 #5 Posted 11 December 2017 - 03:11 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 16791 battles
  • 224
  • Member since:
    06-22-2011

View Posttajj7, on 11 December 2017 - 02:08 PM, said:

This has been suggested for years, I can only presume the Russia server really likes these maps. 

 

I dont think thats the case. While watching skill4ltu few days ago he mentioned that (paris or stalingrad i am not sure) is not on russian server. So why it cant be the other way around? If russians love that map leave it but remove it for eu server.


Edited by djuro900, 11 December 2017 - 03:12 PM.


Jigabachi #6 Posted 11 December 2017 - 03:15 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 17753 battles
  • 17,647
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    08-12-2011
We already complain about that since years. Should be a nobrainer, but... eh... WG.

Browarszky #7 Posted 11 December 2017 - 04:29 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 14906 battles
  • 2,765
  • [I-S-L] I-S-L
  • Member since:
    12-03-2013
Mines is a terrible map, IMO. Ensk is playable, although not a very comfortable map to play on. It's got the right sort of atmosphere.

Bitter_Kipper #8 Posted 11 December 2017 - 04:43 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 23285 battles
  • 390
  • Member since:
    07-10-2014

but, but, but  espurts

Any map where 99% of the tanks can sit in the middle and spot the edges just, NO! Are there any Tier 9s or 10s that can't max their view range?

It is a recurring complaint, but you know WG think it is fair and belenced, especially when arty reduces the actual playable areas.

 

oops forgot the lights :hiding:


Edited by Ballisticgel, 11 December 2017 - 04:43 PM.


Browarszky #9 Posted 11 December 2017 - 04:49 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 14906 battles
  • 2,765
  • [I-S-L] I-S-L
  • Member since:
    12-03-2013

View PostBallisticgel, on 11 December 2017 - 03:43 PM, said:

but, but, but  espurts

Any map where 99% of the tanks can sit in the middle and spot the edges just, NO! Are there any Tier 9s or 10s that can't max their view range?

It is a recurring complaint, but you know WG think it is fair and belenced, especially when arty reduces the actual playable areas.

 

oops forgot the lights :hiding:

 

Please, remember to turn off the lights to save the environment.

Enforcer1975 #10 Posted 11 December 2017 - 05:09 PM

    General

  • Player
  • 18462 battles
  • 9,852
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    05-04-2014

View PostSuperHick, on 11 December 2017 - 02:50 PM, said:

My opinion is that Mines and ENSK should be removed from the game.  for higher tier tanks. Those two are way too small for high tiers.. What do you think comrades? Maps are ideal for tier V tier VI top.. VII VIII IX and X are pointless on those maps... :)

 

FIFY

Cannes76 #11 Posted 11 December 2017 - 05:11 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 62497 battles
  • 1,478
  • [3V] 3V
  • Member since:
    04-16-2011
Ensk I can live with, but I hate mines with a passion. That map should be killed with fire.

SuperHick #12 Posted 11 December 2017 - 05:13 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 29662 battles
  • 43
  • Member since:
    03-01-2012

View PostCannes76, on 11 December 2017 - 04:11 PM, said:

Ensk I can live with, but I hate mines with a passion. That map should be killed with fire.

 

Hell yes! :D

ortega456 #13 Posted 11 December 2017 - 05:24 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 58073 battles
  • 953
  • Member since:
    06-08-2012
Mines imo is playable but ensk is a catastrophe for everything else than well armored tanks. Lights on ensk is a pain in the [edited]if youre not in the better team...

Bennie182 #14 Posted 11 December 2017 - 05:41 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 50381 battles
  • 1,091
  • Member since:
    03-13-2012

View PostSuperHick, on 11 December 2017 - 02:50 PM, said:

My opinion is that Mines and ENSK should be removed for higher tier tanks. Those two are way too small for high tiers.. What do you think comrades? Maps are ideal for tier V tier VI top.. VII VIII IX and X are pointless on those maps... :)

I don't see a use for this topic... a bunch of opinions in a topic over here won't change Jack sh*t

Ensk is trash and should be removed for all tiers. Mines I think is fine. I have no problems with it as long as the mm is normal and not full of bushclickers that you only can spot when you're right next to them.



hopeasusi #15 Posted 11 December 2017 - 05:45 PM

    Sergeant

  • Beta Tester
  • 13003 battles
  • 218
  • Member since:
    11-24-2010

View PostCannes76, on 11 December 2017 - 06:11 PM, said:

Ensk I can live with, but I hate mines with a passion. That map should be killed with fire.

 

Ensk is even worse for high tiers, you can be spotted right from the get go. Way too small for tier VI and bigger.

 

Mines is also too small for those tiers, but a bit less problematic. The unbalanced hill is the bigger problem in this one.



Steve8066 #16 Posted 11 December 2017 - 05:52 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 9630 battles
  • 550
  • Member since:
    10-06-2015
Mines is fun if under Tier 4, anything above and its one of the worst maps going.

CarelessOne #17 Posted 11 December 2017 - 08:35 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 4339 battles
  • 129
  • Member since:
    02-22-2015

Maybe they serve as a break from open maps, so you get even faster matches on high tiers when you are all in one small killbox. 

The bigger problem is with mm not taking into account what classes they throw on map, so you end up on ENSK playing light that is easily outspotted by heavy or TD. Your opportunity to have any impact is severely limited. Same with slow heavies ending on open maps with 3 arties per side.



logaritmusnaturalis #18 Posted 11 December 2017 - 08:41 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 1703 battles
  • 273
  • Member since:
    05-11-2012
Ensk is the worst of them in my opinion, in par with maps like kharkov and stalingrad. 




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users