Jump to content


VK 168.01 Mauerbrecher is Coming Very Soon?


  • Please log in to reply
14 replies to this topic

Search_Warrant #1 Posted 14 December 2017 - 10:19 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 27190 battles
  • 6,152
  • [LEWD] LEWD
  • Member since:
    02-08-2011

https://thearmoredpa...r-insider-news/

 

Our insider tells that the VK 168.01 Mauerbrecher is coming very soon (likely on 24th) and its price will be around 41€. M6A2E1 will also be on sale, and tomorrow we will get Rudy.

 

 

 



qpranger #2 Posted 14 December 2017 - 10:21 AM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 32457 battles
  • 5,061
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    12-25-2013
This Mauerbrecher ... seems to me like the next step will be Edelweiss and Nameless.

Search_Warrant #3 Posted 14 December 2017 - 10:22 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 27190 battles
  • 6,152
  • [LEWD] LEWD
  • Member since:
    02-08-2011
Apparently they buffed the engine to 1600hp. but not touched the weak spots.

leggasiini #4 Posted 14 December 2017 - 10:35 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 14152 battles
  • 6,193
  • [-GLO-] -GLO-
  • Member since:
    12-01-2012

That's a very weird (in a good way, tho) move from WG to go back to old premium policy AKA worse than the elited tank of the same tier. I just don't see that happening, though, when literally every premium released this year has been between roughly on par - much better than average vehicle of the tier. Even more so when it is a super-heavy premium, which with our mighty crayon-eater leader being the balance head who favors super-heavies over anything else in this game.

 

This makes me think of options what will happen:

 

1. It will get another bunch of changes (buffs, or just general changes) via micropatch (most likely thing to happen)

2. It is intended to be like this, however they will nerf the VK 100 to bring it to same level (or worse) than this.

3. WG is actually going back to the old original policy of premiums being worse than the standard vehicles.

4. Or WG is just unintentionally leaving it like this and releaese it anyway. Considering that they actually had to balls to release this absolutely terrible trashcan called "AMX 65t", it is safe to assume that there is literally no brain action going on balance department, and thus they just slap completely random stats and release the tank on that state.


Edited by leggasiini, 14 December 2017 - 10:35 AM.


Hamsterkicker #5 Posted 14 December 2017 - 10:35 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 33987 battles
  • 571
  • [TEAMB] TEAMB
  • Member since:
    08-08-2011

The developments are really only going in one way lately... down hill..

 

 



undutchable80 #6 Posted 14 December 2017 - 10:52 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 7235 battles
  • 1,740
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    10-30-2014

 

 

View PostSearch_Warrant, on 14 December 2017 - 10:19 AM, said:

https://thearmoredpa...r-insider-news/

 

Our insider tells that the VK 168.01 Mauerbrecher is coming very soon (likely on 24th) and its price will be around 41€. M6A2E1 will also be on sale, and tomorrow we will get Rudy.

 

 

 

 

Oh boy, after the shitstorm last time AND players who bought it way back when STILL waiting on compensation...? Gotta go to the store and get some popcorn to witness that epic shitstorm that will surely follow...:popcorn:

 



Aikl #7 Posted 14 December 2017 - 10:56 AM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 25547 battles
  • 4,349
  • [-MM] -MM
  • Member since:
    04-13-2011

View Postundutchable80, on 14 December 2017 - 09:52 AM, said:

 

 

 

Oh boy, after the shitstorm last time AND players who bought it way back when STILL waiting on compensation...? Gotta go to the store and get some popcorn to witness that epic shitstorm that will surely follow...:popcorn:

 

 

​Complicated business, you know. You can kind of see a pattern forming. EU/NA-specific issues seem to be much harder to communicate and fix. I should update my signature banner...

Edited by Aikl, 14 December 2017 - 10:58 AM.


qpranger #8 Posted 14 December 2017 - 11:06 AM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 32457 battles
  • 5,061
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    12-25-2013
But I am sure they will never sell the Defender again :)

LaManche #9 Posted 14 December 2017 - 11:33 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 19288 battles
  • 477
  • Member since:
    03-31-2014
If they do not buff the weakspots and make it as good as its tier VIII non-premium counterpart then I highly doubt I'll buy it.

__H3H3__ #10 Posted 14 December 2017 - 11:37 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 30763 battles
  • 577
  • [OXIDE] OXIDE
  • Member since:
    12-09-2013

View Postleggasiini, on 14 December 2017 - 10:35 AM, said:

That's a very weird (in a good way, tho) move from WG to go back to old premium policy AKA worse than the elited tank of the same tier. I just don't see that happening, though, when literally every premium released this year has been between roughly on par - much better than average vehicle of the tier. Even more so when it is a super-heavy premium, which with our mighty crayon-eater leader being the balance head who favors super-heavies over anything else in this game.

 

This makes me think of options what will happen:

 

1. It will get another bunch of changes (buffs, or just general changes) via micropatch (most likely thing to happen)

2. It is intended to be like this, however they will nerf the VK 100 to bring it to same level (or worse) than this.

3. WG is actually going back to the old original policy of premiums being worse than the standard vehicles.

4. Or WG is just unintentionally leaving it like this and releaese it anyway. Considering that they actually had to balls to release this absolutely terrible trashcan called "AMX 65t", it is safe to assume that there is literally no brain action going on balance department, and thus they just slap completely random stats and release the tank on that state.

 

WG is actually going in the right direction with tier 8 premium tanks now tbh. Guard T92 were very avarage. Nothing wrong with that I am happy to see new premium tanks go back to the old levels. GG Wargaming. Now nerf all the OP premiums or never sell them again.

Search_Warrant #11 Posted 14 December 2017 - 08:40 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 27190 battles
  • 6,152
  • [LEWD] LEWD
  • Member since:
    02-08-2011
T92 wasent average. it was dogsh** even compared to tier 7 LIGHT TANKS!. Guard was balanced right. but you cant start balancing stuff NOW when the damage is already done. you release OP tank? bad move. release average or "balanced tank"? the one you sold previouse is better, so why buy something "balanced"?.

Sams_Baneblade #12 Posted 14 December 2017 - 09:44 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 17025 battles
  • 1,198
  • Member since:
    04-24-2012

View PostLaManche, on 14 December 2017 - 11:33 AM, said:

If they do not buff the weakspots and make it as good as its tier VIII non-premium counterpart then I highly doubt I'll buy it.

 

Giving actual weakspots to that damn VK100 sounds more tempting to me.

Strappster #13 Posted 14 December 2017 - 09:48 PM

    General

  • Player
  • 23968 battles
  • 9,019
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    10-20-2015

View PostSearch_Warrant, on 14 December 2017 - 09:19 AM, said:

... its price will be around 41€.

 



NightHunterTauren #14 Posted 22 December 2017 - 04:58 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 10230 battles
  • 11
  • [ZEON] ZEON
  • Member since:
    12-02-2012

I`m excited for this tank as it looks unique. I dont need OPatriot style of crap. Just a nice looking tank that seems fun. Nothing like a big gun with a long reload. Peek a... BOOM!

Anyways Merry Christmas!



qpranger #15 Posted 22 December 2017 - 05:00 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 32457 battles
  • 5,061
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    12-25-2013

View PostNafre, on 22 December 2017 - 05:58 PM, said:

I`m excited for this tank as it looks unique.

 

Erm, shall I tell him?






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users