Jump to content


GG WG GG...


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
20 replies to this topic

Bukem_Danno #1 Posted 19 December 2017 - 06:10 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 18315 battles
  • 30
  • [LTJ] LTJ
  • Member since:
    01-01-2016
GGWG.jpg

ricoBenitez1 #2 Posted 19 December 2017 - 06:14 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 506 battles
  • 597
  • Member since:
    10-29-2013
Well you cant blame WG for your lack of writing anything. That is 100% your own fault.

Matcorr #3 Posted 19 December 2017 - 06:19 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 22746 battles
  • 764
  • Member since:
    04-24-2013
What do you expect during the holidays with a christmas event on? It's like if cancer and aids had a baby which vaguely resembled Mickey Rourke which then got sandblasted in the face and set on fire. That's MM lately.

mathwat #4 Posted 19 December 2017 - 06:20 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 16494 battles
  • 465
  • Member since:
    11-03-2011

Can’t see anything wrong. You had a good game and lost.:child:

 

Yes you had a lot of zero damage players but that’s normal theses days especially lower tiers. You need to carry more :trollface:


Edited by mathwat, 19 December 2017 - 06:25 AM.


JocMeister #5 Posted 19 December 2017 - 06:23 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 21882 battles
  • 1,878
  • [-MM] -MM
  • Member since:
    08-03-2015
Stop statpadding @ tier 4?

K_A #6 Posted 19 December 2017 - 06:35 AM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 13588 battles
  • 4,663
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    04-18-2013

> 11k battles

> over 4k battles in Luchs

> ???

> nope, no profit here, just a dirty filthy stetpedder:sceptic:

 



Strappster #7 Posted 19 December 2017 - 06:41 AM

    General

  • Player
  • 23695 battles
  • 8,927
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    10-20-2015
Stat-padding in tier 4 at 5am? Yeah, you're not going to find much sympathy for that combination. :rolleyes:

etody77 #8 Posted 19 December 2017 - 07:49 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 61691 battles
  • 943
  • [PT-RO] PT-RO
  • Member since:
    09-12-2015
My best game was a defeat, 11-15, in T1 Heavy, 9 kills, so... dont care about statpadders, 

siramra #9 Posted 19 December 2017 - 07:55 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 25076 battles
  • 1,186
  • [DUXTR] DUXTR
  • Member since:
    08-21-2011

I padd in tier 4s

My team sucked

I go to forum to complain

Nobody cares

Buhuhu

 



snuble #10 Posted 19 December 2017 - 08:08 AM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 31782 battles
  • 196
  • Member since:
    04-08-2011

Well maybe he had a row of this kind of MM. I sympatize. Its infuriating.

 

Since patch mm been like that for me most days. Currently in STG and while not playing that well, its just game after game after game of 40% mm 1/2/3/4-15 losses, just nothing to carry in the first place. 1/8 win/loss with 2k wn8 average is just wrong, and no I'm not redlining. More a bit the opposite. And of course anything below T9 also suffer from the +2 MM syndrom. Where you get +2MM. Might even get a few good players on your team, but does not matter when their T10 is good players and your T10 is tomatoes.

 

Its the bloody MM tomato lottery. It makes my skin itch even if it is supposed to be completly random.



etody77 #11 Posted 19 December 2017 - 08:20 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 61691 battles
  • 943
  • [PT-RO] PT-RO
  • Member since:
    09-12-2015
Statpadder found on tier 2, 19k games in T2 lighz, 20k total games, gold spammer :) buhuhu nobody cares

250swb #12 Posted 19 December 2017 - 09:17 AM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 21727 battles
  • 4,870
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    09-23-2015
I once lost a game but individually did very well in it, did I make a mistake by not posting it on the forum? I can post a photograph of my breakfast if that would help?

arthurwellsley #13 Posted 19 December 2017 - 09:42 AM

    Major

  • Player
  • 51268 battles
  • 2,814
  • [-B-C-] -B-C-
  • Member since:
    05-11-2011

OP = 4,251 games in Luchs from 11,280 games played

.........................................Tier....Damage...Exp..Battles..Wins...wn8


Edited by arthurwellsley, 19 December 2017 - 09:43 AM.


unhappy_bunny #14 Posted 19 December 2017 - 12:04 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 17926 battles
  • 2,470
  • [-OC-] -OC-
  • Member since:
    08-01-2012

View Postarthurwellsley, on 19 December 2017 - 09:42 AM, said:

OP = 4,251 games in Luchs from 11,280 games played

.........................................Tier....Damage...Exp..Battles..Wins...wn8

 

Nah! He's not padding. He's just playing  at a level he is comfortable with and that he knows he is reasonably good at.

What he is doing is picking a battle that he did well  in but lost, then posts it on the forum because he knows someone will then post his stats and he can then bask in the glory of them. 

Oh! maybe that is padding after all?

 

 

1 loss with a w/r in that tank of 66% isnt worth a posting on the forum unless you want to draw attention to yourself. 

 



Balc0ra #15 Posted 19 December 2017 - 12:08 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 64443 battles
  • 15,457
  • [WALL] WALL
  • Member since:
    07-10-2012
If it was a tier X game... I could see it. But the fact that you still expect tier 4's with way less experience then you to carry their own weight along with you is amazing. It's low tiers after all. Most of those are fresh tomatoes, not 11K players like you.

HassenderZerhacker #16 Posted 19 December 2017 - 01:57 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 25595 battles
  • 2,259
  • [1DPG] 1DPG
  • Member since:
    09-09-2015

View PostBalc0ra, on 19 December 2017 - 12:08 PM, said:

If it was a tier X game... I could see it. But the fact that you still expect tier 4's with way less experience then you to carry their own weight along with you is amazing. It's low tiers after all. Most of those are fresh tomatoes, not 11K players like you.

 

I still think it would be better to spread bots among teams in roughly the same proportions.

HundeWurst #17 Posted 19 December 2017 - 03:39 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 67756 battles
  • 4,281
  • [FAME] FAME
  • Member since:
    02-06-2012

Complaing about the randomness of low tier battles.

 

One must be really special to do something like that.



tajj7 #18 Posted 19 December 2017 - 03:55 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 24849 battles
  • 13,836
  • [-MM] -MM
  • Member since:
    03-30-2014

It's tier 4 and 5, plenty of newbies there and they get farmed by padders like you so zero damage games is understandable.

 

Especially as the DPM/alpha to hit points ratio at those tiers is all over the place. T67 has near 2.3k DPM, near 2.7k maxed out and yet the average hit points for that tier is about 550, so you have a tier 5 tank that can shred another tier 5 tank in about 10s. 

 

Many tier 5 meds can 2/3 shot most tier 4 tanks. 



Balc0ra #19 Posted 19 December 2017 - 03:57 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 64443 battles
  • 15,457
  • [WALL] WALL
  • Member since:
    07-10-2012

View PostHassenderZerhacker, on 19 December 2017 - 01:57 PM, said:

 

I still think it would be better to spread bots among teams in roughly the same proportions.

 

Bots as in bad players regardless of if they have 20K games or 1K. Or bots as in new players with less then 2K? As WG did that before on low tiers. It did not work out to well, so they canned it along with the new player protection. 

MeetriX #20 Posted 19 December 2017 - 04:07 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 19678 battles
  • 2,610
  • Member since:
    08-12-2012





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users