Jump to content


Reserves and Games Played instead of time expiration


  • Please log in to reply
8 replies to this topic

Unangwata #1 Posted 20 December 2017 - 12:47 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 7463 battles
  • 239
  • Member since:
    02-26-2017

I wonderf if it wouldn't be better idea to make experience/cash bonuses expire after number of games played instead of a time, like the current change with generic camouflage for tanks. It would be more useful for higher tier games because these are usually longer, and such bonuses last only for few games.

Also you wouldn't be forced to play whole duration to get full benefit of such buff, you could play one game now, other later of time your chosing.

 


Edited by Unangwata, 20 December 2017 - 12:48 PM.


Captain_Kremen0 #2 Posted 20 December 2017 - 12:48 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 36192 battles
  • 1,114
  • Member since:
    06-04-2011

A nice idea and useful.

But not profitable so will not happen methinks



TigerMoth #3 Posted 20 December 2017 - 12:57 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 39504 battles
  • 906
  • Member since:
    04-04-2011

I have no interest in using my reserves until they implement this. If they never implement it, fine by me. I rarely play 2 hours solid; I often play a game then get distracted by TV/food/coffee/postman/work/kids/dogs/pr0n then have another game about 30 minutes later. I would say the reserves should be good for 6-8 games.

 

On the same note, the x5 bonuses they give with purchasing a premium tank bundle should never expire, either.


Edited by TigerMoth, 20 December 2017 - 12:59 PM.


RinTin_NL #4 Posted 20 December 2017 - 01:05 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 14479 battles
  • 656
  • Member since:
    08-08-2014

Great idea, just like the camo you can buy for 100 games!

 

Next thing is premium time!


Edited by RinTin_NL, 20 December 2017 - 01:05 PM.


SuedKAT #5 Posted 20 December 2017 - 01:53 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 12154 battles
  • 6,152
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    08-21-2014
As a player, yes that would be great, but from WG's perspective it wouldn't which really what it comes down to in the end most of the time.

Unangwata #6 Posted 20 December 2017 - 01:57 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 7463 battles
  • 239
  • Member since:
    02-26-2017

View PostSuedKAT, on 20 December 2017 - 01:53 PM, said:

As a player, yes that would be great, but from WG's perspective it wouldn't which really what it comes down to in the end most of the time.

 

I find them rather player friendly, considering effort and changes they make.

SuedKAT #7 Posted 20 December 2017 - 02:05 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 12154 battles
  • 6,152
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    08-21-2014

View PostUnangwata, on 20 December 2017 - 01:57 PM, said:

 

I find them rather player friendly, considering effort and changes they make.

 

Well if this is your first account you haven't been around long enough, if WG can make a profit from something they will most of the time do it, if they can improve something but it would mean that they lose profit from it they won't do it. The new camo system was a nice improvement, but in the long run it will most likely make them more money due to to people wanting to kit out their tanks even more.

Unangwata #8 Posted 20 December 2017 - 02:11 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 7463 battles
  • 239
  • Member since:
    02-26-2017

View PostSuedKAT, on 20 December 2017 - 02:05 PM, said:

 

Well if this is your first account you haven't been around long enough, if WG can make a profit from something they will most of the time do it, if they can improve something but it would mean that they lose profit from it they won't do it. The new camo system was a nice improvement, but in the long run it will most likely make them more money due to to people wanting to kit out their tanks even more.

 

Well, it is easy to believe, however any company is made of humans. Not all humans are like greed-consumed robots, especially it is unlikely that all humans in company think only of profit. It's actually unlikely that there are such , after all they make computer game. Humans tend to have spirit and enjoy creating fun for other humans if they have a chance. They rather have to keep it profitable too to keep going but doesn't have to be priority you know.

SuedKAT #9 Posted 20 December 2017 - 02:16 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 12154 battles
  • 6,152
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    08-21-2014

View PostUnangwata, on 20 December 2017 - 02:11 PM, said:

 

Well, it is easy to believe, however any company is made of humans. Not all humans are like greed-consumed robots, especially it is unlikely that all humans in company think only of profit. It's actually unlikely that there are such , after all they make computer game. Humans tend to have spirit and enjoy creating fun for other humans if they have a chance. They rather have to keep it profitable too to keep going but doesn't have to be priority you know.

 

I don't think you'll find a lot of people around the forum that share that opinion, generally WG equals to profits before everything, we got to fund Serbs moon dreams after all: http://ftr.wot-news....ild-a-moonbase/




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users