Jump to content


E-25 platoons


  • Please log in to reply
23 replies to this topic

skero #1 Posted 22 December 2017 - 01:03 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 25865 battles
  • 609
  • [UNI_C] UNI_C
  • Member since:
    06-01-2011
Good job Wargaming on selling this broken tank again. Those battles just ruining the game playing against invisible shots spamming mini tanks. Good Job! But it was worth the money, of course. This is unbelievable

HugSeal #2 Posted 22 December 2017 - 01:07 AM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 22717 battles
  • 2,058
  • [SWEC] SWEC
  • Member since:
    05-10-2012
U jelly brah?

OreH75 #3 Posted 22 December 2017 - 01:21 AM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 47901 battles
  • 2,138
  • [RANGR] RANGR
  • Member since:
    05-29-2013

View PostHugSeal, on 22 December 2017 - 01:07 AM, said:

U jelly brah?

 

He missed the sale again I think...

TheWarrener #4 Posted 22 December 2017 - 06:35 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 3407 battles
  • 355
  • Member since:
    10-31-2017
You need to cut down on these QB videos fam

PauI #5 Posted 22 December 2017 - 07:35 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 25734 battles
  • 399
  • Member since:
    10-15-2011
E25 is a great tank if played right. 3marked mime and i am keeping the mark at arount 97%. Must be played in a certain way om some maps and in a different manner on some others. Solo is tricky...but in plutoon it is brokem as hell...but i did not see many e25 plutoons.

TankkiPoju #6 Posted 22 December 2017 - 08:40 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 20432 battles
  • 6,203
  • Member since:
    05-20-2011

View Postskero, on 22 December 2017 - 01:03 AM, said:

Good job Wargaming on selling this broken tank again. Those battles just ruining the game playing against invisible shots spamming mini tanks. Good Job! But it was worth the money, of course. This is unbelievable

 

Why is it unbelievable if you just witnessed it yourself.

Taegus #7 Posted 22 December 2017 - 09:04 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 40102 battles
  • 1,611
  • [KITTY] KITTY
  • Member since:
    05-01-2015

View PostPauI, on 22 December 2017 - 07:35 AM, said:

E25 is a great tank if played right. 3marked mime and i am keeping the mark at arount 97%. Must be played in a certain way om some maps and in a different manner on some others. Solo is tricky...but in plutoon it is brokem as hell...but i did not see many e25 plutoons.

 

There are tons of tanks that are good in platoons. Any autoloader for instance. Thas says nothing about the tanks. 

 

E25 is fine, there are tons of more broken tanks in WOT and tons of bigger problems. Like the completely broken T8 and T10 MM etc...



Balc0ra #8 Posted 22 December 2017 - 11:24 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 66298 battles
  • 16,320
  • [WALL] WALL
  • Member since:
    07-10-2012
Only seen one E 25 platoon this Xmas. And I hardly see one in every game. As the E25 population hardly did go up. Due to the bundle price I suspect. And most E25's I've seen the past few days have 500+ games in their. As in they already had it before it went on sale again. Then again... I've seen more Type 59's then E25's this week.

qpranger #9 Posted 22 December 2017 - 11:26 AM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 32524 battles
  • 5,061
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    12-25-2013
What is E25 ?

Blubba #10 Posted 22 December 2017 - 11:34 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 53652 battles
  • 1,954
  • [_GNR_] _GNR_
  • Member since:
    05-30-2011

Very rare sight. Not unbeatable by any means. Especially in tight maps. Don't see it as an issue really.



skero #11 Posted 22 December 2017 - 07:54 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 25865 battles
  • 609
  • [UNI_C] UNI_C
  • Member since:
    06-01-2011

View PostBlubba, on 22 December 2017 - 11:34 AM, said:

Very rare sight. Not unbeatable by any means. Especially in tight maps. Don't see it as an issue really.

 

LOL. Of course they are beatable, anything is beatable. But we are talking about random battles, not CW. Im writing about issue when you are against E-25 platoon and your team have none. Even average player can use this tank effectively which is not very hard on open maps. That camo is ridiculous + it is harder to hit at long ranges and of course mobility / ROF. This tank was removed for a REASON,

It is clearly above others on its tier and you don´t have to be great player. Selling it again is just wrong.

And I didn´t miss anything. Played the game when this was normally in the game. Didn´t want it because I saw the issues with it and it was inevitable that WG needed to remove it.

So adding it again on sale is stupid as hell. Why then not have it again in tech treee? Or no wait, why not have it normally in the shop? My god. But fanboys will defend any dirt WG throws in.

 

Money > balancing issues.

Your Wargaming.



iuytr #12 Posted 22 December 2017 - 07:57 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 9502 battles
  • 525
  • Member since:
    06-04-2015
Type 64 is the most OP tank in the game atm

Edited by iuytr, 22 December 2017 - 09:27 PM.


MrGimpSuit #13 Posted 22 December 2017 - 07:58 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 10012 battles
  • 269
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    12-04-2012
E25 toons anyone?

commer #14 Posted 22 December 2017 - 08:03 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 38082 battles
  • 1,995
  • Member since:
    06-14-2011

View PostTaegus, on 22 December 2017 - 09:04 AM, said:

 

There are tons of tanks that are good in platoons. Any autoloader for instance. Thas says nothing about the tanks. 

 

E25 is fine, there are tons of more broken tanks in WOT and tons of bigger problems. Like the completely broken T8 and T10 MM etc...

 

Exactly. 3 skodas, 2xt95 + something to cover them in case of circling, 3x Type5, 3x Defender, 3x amx 13 57 or 3x PZ B2. All of them are much worse to have on the enemy team than 3x e25

RamRaid90 #15 Posted 22 December 2017 - 08:06 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 21517 battles
  • 6,488
  • [D0NG] D0NG
  • Member since:
    12-14-2014

View Postskero, on 22 December 2017 - 06:54 PM, said:

 

LOL. Of course they are beatable, anything is beatable. But we are talking about random battles, not CW. Im writing about issue when you are against E-25 platoon and your team have none. Even average player can use this tank effectively which is not very hard on open maps. That camo is ridiculous + it is harder to hit at long ranges and of course mobility / ROF. This tank was removed for a REASON,

It is clearly above others on its tier and you don´t have to be great player. Selling it again is just wrong.

And I didn´t miss anything. Played the game when this was normally in the game. Didn´t want it because I saw the issues with it and it was inevitable that WG needed to remove it.

So adding it again on sale is stupid as hell. Why then not have it again in tech treee? Or no wait, why not have it normally in the shop? My god. But fanboys will defend any dirt WG throws in.

 

Money > balancing issues.

Your Wargaming.

 

This tank was removed for a REASON. The only reason it was removed was population control, nothing more.

 

tank effectively which is not very hard on open maps. Yes because those are in abundance in this game ... :unsure:



skero #16 Posted 22 December 2017 - 08:12 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 25865 battles
  • 609
  • [UNI_C] UNI_C
  • Member since:
    06-01-2011

View PostRamRaid90, on 22 December 2017 - 08:06 PM, said:

 

This tank was removed for a REASON. The only reason it was removed was population control, nothing more.

 

tank effectively which is not very hard on open maps. Yes because those are in abundance in this game ... :unsure:

 

Oh, population reason... What coincidence. So it had to be so awful tank that no one wanted to play it.. Ok, now I understand.

RamRaid90 #17 Posted 22 December 2017 - 08:17 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 21517 battles
  • 6,488
  • [D0NG] D0NG
  • Member since:
    12-14-2014

View Postskero, on 22 December 2017 - 07:12 PM, said:

 

Oh, population reason... What coincidence. So it had to be so awful tank that no one wanted to play it.. Ok, now I understand.

 

It was popular because it was cheap, printed credits, had a high ROF, and it was fast with good camo. It's the very defninition of fun, most players sucked in it then and they suck in it now.

 

It still has bad penetration even with premium shells. Even worse now with the power creep the tank is effectively useless vs the new tier VIII heavy armour meta. O-ho is impenetrable, IS-3/Defender clan are impenetrable, Even the Caernarvon now is practically impenetrable.


Edited by RamRaid90, 22 December 2017 - 08:17 PM.


skero #18 Posted 22 December 2017 - 08:31 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 25865 battles
  • 609
  • [UNI_C] UNI_C
  • Member since:
    06-01-2011

View Postcommer, on 22 December 2017 - 08:03 PM, said:

 

Exactly. 3 skodas, 2xt95 + something to cover them in case of circling, 3x Type5, 3x Defender, 3x amx 13 57 or 3x PZ B2. All of them are much worse to have on the enemy team than 3x e25

 

Yes, slow tanks are so popular.. Everyone wants to crawl to the hole and wait there 15 minutes. What a great example. E25 is usable in most situations unlike T95. And tank is popular for a reason. T95 is really not and such platoons are horrible.

 

So again someone purposely ignore the facts. People love E25 because it is so SMALL, MOBILE, exceptional CAMO and has great ROF. Of course this is FUN but it is destroyng game balance. You can pen Defender, he is not invisible. You can deal with Skoda, not so small, not so invisible.

 

E25 camo/spotting ability is too often gamebreaking. So again, why the tank is so damn popular it must have been removed? So damn hard to see it, right?

And I don´t blame people for loving it. I blame WG for creating it, removing it and selling it again.

If you can´t see difference between E25 and those other tanks I´m sorry. But of course I admit that game has more issues than just E25. This is just clear example.


Edited by skero, 22 December 2017 - 08:32 PM.


Taegus #19 Posted 22 December 2017 - 10:06 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 40102 battles
  • 1,611
  • [KITTY] KITTY
  • Member since:
    05-01-2015

View Postskero, on 22 December 2017 - 08:12 PM, said:

 

Oh, population reason... What coincidence. So it had to be so awful tank that no one wanted to play it.. Ok, now I understand.

 

It broke MM by shere numbers. Do you understand the difference. Ofc its a good tank, noone is denying that. There are tons of good tanks in WOT. But its not OP. There are plenty much more powerfull tanks in WOT.

Its just people keep crying and crying about the same things and miss far more broken tanks and changes go by them.



Taegus #20 Posted 22 December 2017 - 10:07 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 40102 battles
  • 1,611
  • [KITTY] KITTY
  • Member since:
    05-01-2015

View PostRamRaid90, on 22 December 2017 - 08:17 PM, said:

 

It was popular because it was cheap, printed credits, had a high ROF, and it was fast with good camo. It's the very defninition of fun, most players sucked in it then and they suck in it now.

 

It still has bad penetration even with premium shells. Even worse now with the power creep the tank is effectively useless vs the new tier VIII heavy armour meta. O-ho is impenetrable, IS-3/Defender clan are impenetrable, Even the Caernarvon now is practically impenetrable.

 

Caernarvon in its current state is more OP then E25 for instance. But noone is crying about that. Funny isn't it.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users