Jump to content


MM fix. Chose your tier. Get appriopriate reward.


  • Please log in to reply
51 replies to this topic

Unangwata #1 Posted 22 December 2017 - 03:36 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 9219 battles
  • 239
  • [-NASA] -NASA
  • Member since:
    02-26-2017

Instead being randomly put and have enough frustration being bottom tier all the time, why not let us chose whether we want to be in top, middle or bottom tier  and reward us accordingly.

 



Obsessive_Compulsive #2 Posted 22 December 2017 - 03:49 PM

    General

  • Player
  • 26448 battles
  • 8,048
  • [ADUK] ADUK
  • Member since:
    09-09-2014

View PostUnangwata, on 22 December 2017 - 03:36 PM, said:

Instead being randomly put and have enough frustration being bottom tier all the time, why not let us chose whether we want to be in top, middle or bottom tier  and reward us accordingly.

 

 

I guess you mean xp and credits mutipliers based on tier choice. Well.. how does the mm cope with such a choice? it sounds chaotic!

Ziurawka #3 Posted 22 December 2017 - 03:52 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 21743 battles
  • 439
  • [NLUFA] NLUFA
  • Member since:
    08-02-2015
If I can be always top tier in any game I play in any of my tier VIII I'll gladly lose 100k credits on each game I win. Double when I lose. 

Balc0ra #4 Posted 22 December 2017 - 04:32 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 66549 battles
  • 16,586
  • [WALL] WALL
  • Member since:
    07-10-2012

View PostUnangwata, on 22 December 2017 - 03:36 PM, said:

Instead being randomly put and have enough frustration being bottom tier all the time, why not let us chose whether we want to be in top, middle or bottom tier  and reward us accordingly.

 

 

Yeah that would not be abused by platoons ever right? Put the stock gun on. Get 2x more DPM and less pen and roll over everything. Or make premium platoons as E25's and select top tier.

RamRaid90 #5 Posted 22 December 2017 - 04:36 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 22025 battles
  • 6,600
  • [D0NG] D0NG
  • Member since:
    12-14-2014

Everyone will always select top tier...leading to only single tier matches of 15 IS-3/Defender/252U vs 15 of the same in tier VIII. PLaying anything else will be pointless.

 

Did you even mull this around in there before posting?



ZlatanArKung #6 Posted 22 December 2017 - 04:39 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 1529 battles
  • 5,112
  • Member since:
    12-20-2014
A choice to always be top tiered?
Yes, I want to always be top tiered.

Unangwata #7 Posted 22 December 2017 - 06:29 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 9219 battles
  • 239
  • [-NASA] -NASA
  • Member since:
    02-26-2017
Ok guys, you underestimate xp and credit bonus for chosing bottom tier. I'm surprised you all want to be top tier always, that sucks. What if chosing top tier gives only 0.5 xp, and chosing bottom tier gives xp x2 ?

MrGimpSuit #8 Posted 22 December 2017 - 06:34 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 10166 battles
  • 301
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    12-04-2012

Dude this is such a great and well thought out idea! WG need to hire you asap to make these excellent changes a reality kappa 

 

But I would pay to be top tier every time because Kek. 



RamRaid90 #9 Posted 22 December 2017 - 06:38 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 22025 battles
  • 6,600
  • [D0NG] D0NG
  • Member since:
    12-14-2014

View PostUnangwata, on 22 December 2017 - 05:29 PM, said:

Ok guys, you underestimate xp and credit bonus for chosing bottom tier. I'm surprised you all want to be top tier always, that sucks. What if chosing top tier gives only 0.5 xp, and chosing bottom tier gives xp x2 ?

 

I would take winning games over XP any day.

 

Of course, you could always choose to be bottom tier and wait 3 weeks in the battle que for your x2 xp...


Edited by RamRaid90, 22 December 2017 - 06:39 PM.


vasilinhorulezz #10 Posted 22 December 2017 - 06:44 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 22813 battles
  • 1,109
  • Member since:
    09-26-2014

View PostRamRaid90, on 22 December 2017 - 06:38 PM, said:

 

I would take winning games over XP any day.

 

Of course, you could always choose to be bottom tier and wait 3 weeks in the battle que for your x2 xp...

 

Nailed it :great:!

Unangwata #11 Posted 22 December 2017 - 06:48 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 9219 battles
  • 239
  • [-NASA] -NASA
  • Member since:
    02-26-2017

View PostRamRaid90, on 22 December 2017 - 06:38 PM, said:

 

I would take winning games over XP any day.

 

Of course, you could always choose to be bottom tier and wait 3 weeks in the battle que for your x2 xp...

 

What makes you think taking top tier gives winnig game ?

And why 3 weeks for bottom tier ? I don't see your logic here. Are you implying no one would chose bottom ?


Edited by Unangwata, 22 December 2017 - 06:49 PM.


vasilinhorulezz #12 Posted 22 December 2017 - 07:30 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 22813 battles
  • 1,109
  • Member since:
    09-26-2014

View PostUnangwata, on 22 December 2017 - 06:48 PM, said:

 

What makes you think taking top tier gives winnig game ?

And why 3 weeks for bottom tier ? I don't see your logic here. Are you implying no one would chose bottom ?

 

Easy,

when top tier:

I can influence the battle more and can dictate the flow of the battle, so bigger chances to win

bottom tier:

I depend on my top tiers to do their job, and stay alive, as I struggle to take some damaging shots whenever I get the chance, if the fail, I get farmed by the enemy's top tiers.

And yea,

people will chose the option to be top tier as often as possible.



Pansenmann #13 Posted 22 December 2017 - 07:32 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 34360 battles
  • 12,727
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    08-17-2012

View PostUnangwata, on 22 December 2017 - 06:29 PM, said:

Ok guys, you underestimate xp and credit bonus for chosing bottom tier. I'm surprised you all want to be top tier always, that sucks. What if chosing top tier gives only 0.5 xp, and chosing bottom tier gives xp x2 ?

 

who cares?

I just activates all reserves I have,

add premium account and am always top tier.

 

what more to ask for?



Unangwata #14 Posted 22 December 2017 - 07:39 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 9219 battles
  • 239
  • [-NASA] -NASA
  • Member since:
    02-26-2017

View Postvasilinhorulezz, on 22 December 2017 - 07:30 PM, said:

 

Easy,

when top tier:

I can influence the battle more and can dictate the flow of the battle, so bigger chances to win

bottom tier:

I depend on my top tiers to do their job, and stay alive, as I struggle to take some damaging shots whenever I get the chance, if the fail, I get farmed by the enemy's top tiers.

And yea,

people will chose the option to be top tier as often as possible.

 

That's projection. You assume people think like you do and believe that's reality. You could be surprised.

vasilinhorulezz #15 Posted 22 December 2017 - 07:44 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 22813 battles
  • 1,109
  • Member since:
    09-26-2014

View PostUnangwata, on 22 December 2017 - 07:39 PM, said:

 

That's projection. You assume people think like you do and believe that's reality. You could be surprised.

 

The amount of people complaining (daily with new threads about how f**@* up tier 8 MM is) doesn't give a hint to you about what will happen?

Really?

People don't like to be in the shallow end of the gene pool.



Unangwata #16 Posted 22 December 2017 - 07:50 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 9219 battles
  • 239
  • [-NASA] -NASA
  • Member since:
    02-26-2017
I don't see anything wrong with being low tier. Game is more challenging and interesting. Half of the tanks are same tier anyways. You people get butthurt over game which will never reward you with anything non-virtual/substantial, as if something in your life depend on it -which actually doesn't. The only thing you can get out of it is satisfaction, and if you only try to look good, as if anybody really gives a fck, then you are just wasting time.

MrGimpSuit #17 Posted 22 December 2017 - 08:00 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 10166 battles
  • 301
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    12-04-2012

View PostUnangwata, on 22 December 2017 - 06:50 PM, said:

I don't see anything wrong with being low tier. Game is more challenging and interesting.

 

Then just play Tier8. 



RamRaid90 #18 Posted 22 December 2017 - 08:04 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 22025 battles
  • 6,600
  • [D0NG] D0NG
  • Member since:
    12-14-2014

View PostUnangwata, on 22 December 2017 - 06:50 PM, said:

I don't see anything wrong with being low tier. Game is more challenging and interesting. Half of the tanks are same tier anyways. You people get butthurt over game which will never reward you with anything non-virtual/substantial, as if something in your life depend on it -which actually doesn't. The only thing you can get out of it is satisfaction, and if you only try to look good, as if anybody really gives a fck, then you are just wasting time.

 

You fail to see the repercussions of being bottom tier in your supposed "new MM".

 

You won't have the half bottom tier, you will be the only one in a cromwell vs 15 IS-3s...good luck with that.



250swb #19 Posted 22 December 2017 - 08:16 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 22927 battles
  • 5,134
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    09-23-2015

View PostUnangwata, on 22 December 2017 - 06:39 PM, said:

 

That's projection. You assume people think like you do and believe that's reality. You could be surprised.

 

 

Yeah, I don't think a fundamental change to the game should be based on wish fulfilment.



Pvt_Duffer #20 Posted 22 December 2017 - 08:26 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 16658 battles
  • 3,146
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    05-11-2011

Frankly I hate being top tier, that's why I always played light tanks till the demise of +3

If you want to give me double XP and credits for always choosing to be cannon fodder for higher tiers, great.

 

I'll be able to fail my way to tier 10 even faster.

Not that I'm in a rush tho'.






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users