Jump to content


If they introduce "select two maps you don't want to play", what would you choose?


  • Please log in to reply
106 replies to this topic

zen_monk_ #1 Posted 23 December 2017 - 09:10 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Clan Diplomat
  • 25307 battles
  • 457
  • Member since:
    05-08-2011

Kharkov
Stalingrad

 

(would gladly pay to play on a server without them)



Enforcer1975 #2 Posted 23 December 2017 - 09:10 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 20465 battles
  • 10,531
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    05-04-2014
Overlord and overlord.

Ruumpel902 #3 Posted 23 December 2017 - 09:10 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 2740 battles
  • 31
  • Member since:
    07-06-2011
Ensk Mines or Mines Sand River

Blubba #4 Posted 23 December 2017 - 09:11 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 52543 battles
  • 1,911
  • Member since:
    05-30-2011
Stalingrad and Mittenguard

Jumping_Turtle #5 Posted 23 December 2017 - 09:12 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 60289 battles
  • 5,179
  • [CNUT] CNUT
  • Member since:
    10-15-2013
Kharkov and Stalingrad

8126Jakobsson #6 Posted 23 December 2017 - 09:13 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 62675 battles
  • 3,090
  • Member since:
    12-20-2014

View Postzen_monk_, on 23 December 2017 - 09:10 PM, said:

Kharkov
Stalingrad

 

(would gladly pay to play on a server without them)

 

I would go with that duo or Highway/Windstorm.   



Cannes76 #7 Posted 23 December 2017 - 09:14 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 64440 battles
  • 1,610
  • [3V] 3V
  • Member since:
    04-16-2011
Mines and Tundra.

Derethim #8 Posted 23 December 2017 - 09:17 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 17107 battles
  • 1,844
  • Member since:
    04-03-2012

Paris, Sand River in Assault mode.

 

... and this post could use a poll op, just super saiyan 



8126Jakobsson #9 Posted 23 December 2017 - 09:19 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 62675 battles
  • 3,090
  • Member since:
    12-20-2014
Wait, didn't we have an official vote like this some time ago where Kharkov and Stalingrad actually "won" and had their chances of getting picked in the rotation lessened? I have a feeling that they have turned their numbers back to normal, but it did happen, right? 

Brodie_ #10 Posted 23 December 2017 - 09:24 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 77610 battles
  • 486
  • Member since:
    10-21-2013
Stalingrad & Karkov, with Ensk a very close 3rd... Or maybe Paris 3rd...

Nishi_Kinuyo #11 Posted 23 December 2017 - 09:25 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 7455 battles
  • 3,882
  • [GUP] GUP
  • Member since:
    05-28-2011

Prokhorovka and Malinovka.

Two maps where way too many people kemp bush and don't have the balls to push even a single corner/line.



FluffyRedFox #12 Posted 23 December 2017 - 09:27 PM

    General

  • Player
  • 22547 battles
  • 8,087
  • [LEWD] LEWD
  • Member since:
    12-05-2012
Paris and Overlord

bitslice #13 Posted 23 December 2017 - 09:34 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 22309 battles
  • 541
  • Member since:
    12-28-2013

Paris, Stalingrad

 

and I've even placed those lower than the tedious gold corridor that is Himmelsbore.

 

 

If you negate the affects of light tanks and arty by shitty map design, then you've just massively unbalanced the game in favour of heavies.

So tough tits if you are not in a gold heavy that day

 

 

 



gullungen #14 Posted 23 December 2017 - 09:43 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 24495 battles
  • 411
  • [NTRS] NTRS
  • Member since:
    12-10-2011
Ensk and Mines

Pvt_Duffer #15 Posted 23 December 2017 - 09:45 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 16653 battles
  • 3,144
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    05-11-2011
no poll, can't vote

Hardass #16 Posted 23 December 2017 - 09:48 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Beta Tester
  • 32722 battles
  • 1,189
  • Member since:
    08-03-2010
They wont ever give us a choice on what maps we play on as player will only play the maps they play best on some maps you will have ques for ages some you wont have any players queuing for.

SirDixie #17 Posted 23 December 2017 - 09:49 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 19375 battles
  • 716
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    09-08-2012
Ensk. Twice.

RamRaid90 #18 Posted 23 December 2017 - 09:50 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 20550 battles
  • 6,279
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    12-14-2014

View PostDerethim, on 23 December 2017 - 08:17 PM, said:

Paris, Sand River in Assault mode.

 

... and this post could use a poll op, just super saiyan 

 

One of those maps you can already get rid of. Assault mode sucks anyway.

 

To OP: I would lock mines and lock Himmelsdorf.



_Anarchistic_ #19 Posted 23 December 2017 - 10:04 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 36466 battles
  • 1,081
  • Member since:
    01-07-2015

mmm that's harder than I imagined picking just 2 !!!

 

Pilsen defo but there are far too many badly balanced maps

 

I despise ruinberg, swamp, sacred valley, abbey and Paris so 1 of those and probably in that order

 

very surprised to see Kharkov, Stalingrad, malinovka and Prok mentioned, 4 of the best maps in the game !!

 



SuedKAT #20 Posted 23 December 2017 - 10:10 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 12154 battles
  • 6,284
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    08-21-2014
There are quite a few maps in the game I don't mind playing, but only at tier 1-4, tier 5 and 6 can work, but preferably not, the 2 most obvious examples are Mines and Tundra. As for maps I'd want to avoid completely, well Abbey and Stalingrad are the most obvious candidates, but there are a few more corridor orientated maps that are really bad as bottom tier that I really dislike as well.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users