Jump to content


BUFF Type 95


  • Please log in to reply
20 replies to this topic

SzuleckQAWA #1 Posted 27 December 2017 - 09:59 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 5947 battles
  • 27
  • [CDKP] CDKP
  • Member since:
    08-08-2013
or at the very least limit its MM to tier 4, this tank is so bad and to make it even worse its premium rounds are HEAT, like wtf? if it at least looked good I might've not made this thread, but that [edited]-like thing asymmetrically sticking out of the tower annoys the crap out of me every time I drive the vehicle 

Edited by SzuleckQAWA, 27 December 2017 - 10:12 PM.


DuncaN_101 #2 Posted 27 December 2017 - 10:02 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 53726 battles
  • 2,035
  • [-B-C-] -B-C-
  • Member since:
    07-29-2011
nice constructive post good job ... ow wait

SzuleckQAWA #3 Posted 27 December 2017 - 10:03 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 5947 battles
  • 27
  • [CDKP] CDKP
  • Member since:
    08-08-2013
.

Edited by SzuleckQAWA, 27 December 2017 - 10:04 PM.


SzuleckQAWA #4 Posted 27 December 2017 - 10:03 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 5947 battles
  • 27
  • [CDKP] CDKP
  • Member since:
    08-08-2013

View PostDuncaN_101, on 27 December 2017 - 09:02 PM, said:

nice constructive post good job ... ow wait

 

I figured there was no reason for providing arguments for something as obvious as this.

Edited by SzuleckQAWA, 27 December 2017 - 10:03 PM.


DuncaN_101 #5 Posted 27 December 2017 - 10:05 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 53726 battles
  • 2,035
  • [-B-C-] -B-C-
  • Member since:
    07-29-2011
dude its a low tier tank ... in the words of an obscure clan in WoT ... Deal with it

SzuleckQAWA #6 Posted 27 December 2017 - 10:08 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 5947 battles
  • 27
  • [CDKP] CDKP
  • Member since:
    08-08-2013

View PostDuncaN_101, on 27 December 2017 - 09:05 PM, said:

dude its a low tier tank ... in the words of an obscure clan in WoT ... Deal with it

 

absurd way to approach things, tanks of all tiers should either be "playable" or at the very least enjoyable to play for one reason or the other, this tank is neither, and it's ugly, very ugly

Aikl #7 Posted 27 December 2017 - 10:13 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 26003 battles
  • 4,349
  • [-MM] -MM
  • Member since:
    04-13-2011
My Type 95 grind was rather pleasant, IIRC predating the already-limited matchmaker, and lasted 11 battles with a winrate of 82%. I believe that was solo. Perhaps lucky, but your suffering is limited, and likely intentional given that the rest of the line is a grind-free campaign of bringing plague and cholera to the battlefield - by going slow and clicking in the general direction of enemy tanks.

250swb #8 Posted 27 December 2017 - 10:33 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 23141 battles
  • 5,259
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    09-23-2015
It needs a buff, but I don't want it to have a buff because it is the easiest tank in the game to kill after the T-28.

AvengerOrion #9 Posted 27 December 2017 - 10:37 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 26223 battles
  • 1,150
  • Member since:
    12-21-2013

The crappy low tiers is your payment for all the mindless HE spam you can do with the high tiers.

 

So yes, deal with it.



Nishi_Kinuyo #10 Posted 27 December 2017 - 10:50 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 7851 battles
  • 4,518
  • [GUP] GUP
  • Member since:
    05-28-2011

The tank is utter rubbish thanks to its gun.

At least give it the same 47mm or 57mm guns that the other two Japanese tier 4 tanks get.

That alone would be a major buff, and imo the only one currently needed.



MR_FIAT #11 Posted 27 December 2017 - 11:44 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 19921 battles
  • 1,591
  • [_RBP_] _RBP_
  • Member since:
    05-16-2015
It has no armor (pennable by HE) and is insanely slow, ontop of having a gun of questionable quality. certainly could do with some buffs, didnt mind the gun that much but 22 km/h speed limit is realy annoying ontop being able to be HE penned.

Xandania #12 Posted 28 December 2017 - 01:15 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 37243 battles
  • 1,107
  • [-DGN-] -DGN-
  • Member since:
    05-16-2013

two tips:

don't platoon with it except with other same tier heavies - it only sees tier 5 on its own

use HE with the big gun - it plays rather nicely as a support-derp



Negativvv #13 Posted 28 December 2017 - 02:22 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 9590 battles
  • 1,131
  • [KEKE] KEKE
  • Member since:
    08-08-2015

It's like a big green balloon that derp guns love to pop...

 

Plus your reward for finishing the grind are super heavy tanks.



Killer_Tia #14 Posted 28 December 2017 - 03:01 AM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 873 battles
  • 143
  • Member since:
    04-12-2015
Besides, its not even close to being as bad a tank as the Pz.IV A is.

PowJay #15 Posted 28 December 2017 - 09:26 AM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 36046 battles
  • 4,275
  • Member since:
    09-07-2012

 

 


 

Terrible tank, obviously.

 

In all honesty, though: it is the inconsistency which does annoy me. Some days that gun obliterates everything, and other times I do naf all in a battle. OK, some of this is tier dependant, but it is more than that.



mickleblade #16 Posted 28 December 2017 - 09:34 AM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 17200 battles
  • 262
  • Member since:
    12-11-2013
it does suck eh? sit at the back and spam HE. You have to sit back 'cos it's so slow. I could only bear to play 26 games in it and then found I hated the OI....what a waste of xp

ederfe #17 Posted 28 December 2017 - 09:41 AM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 15373 battles
  • 285
  • Member since:
    01-13-2015

View PostAvengerOrion, on 28 December 2017 - 12:37 AM, said:

The crappy low tiers is your payment for all the mindless HE spam you can do with the high tiers.

 

So yes, deal with it.

 

Mindless HE spam is how you play this one too. :)

Merton15 #18 Posted 28 December 2017 - 09:50 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 13893 battles
  • 464
  • Member since:
    04-08-2011
Why should WG waste time reworking a tank you can grind through in a handful of games? I didn't think it was that bad anyway, used right the gun can dish out a bit and it was more user friendly than the Lee.

PowJay #19 Posted 28 December 2017 - 09:54 AM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 36046 battles
  • 4,275
  • Member since:
    09-07-2012

View Postmickleblade, on 28 December 2017 - 08:34 AM, said:

it does suck eh? sit at the back and spam HE. You have to sit back 'cos it's so slow. I could only bear to play 26 games in it and then found I hated the OI....what a waste of xp

 

I don't sit at the back. I go forward as much as I dare.


 

I also hated the Japanese HT line, but I had done well in the Type 95 first time around, so I abandoned the O-I and put the crew back in the Type 95. In addition to the Wn8/WR above, I admit to having 108 Fire for Effect and 8 High Calibre medals, 16 Fighter and 3 Top Guns, and 1 Naydin, 1 Dumitru and 1 Pascucci medal as well.

 

I have a survival rate of (not quite) 33%.


Edited by PowJay, 28 December 2017 - 09:56 AM.


Tiger_Panzermeyer #20 Posted 28 December 2017 - 01:42 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 12323 battles
  • 121
  • Member since:
    04-06-2017

View PostPowJay, on 28 December 2017 - 09:26 AM, said:

 

 


 

Terrible tank, obviously.

 

In all honesty, though: it is the inconsistency which does annoy me. Some days that gun obliterates everything, and other times I do naf all in a battle. OK, some of this is tier dependant, but it is more than that.

Crap tank dunno how i got 60% wr lol






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users