Jump to content


Some thoughts about Mauerbrecher and T92


  • Please log in to reply
15 replies to this topic

TankkiPoju #1 Posted 28 December 2017 - 08:16 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 20014 battles
  • 6,192
  • Member since:
    05-20-2011

Have you guys noticed what WG did with these tanks, but no one really said it out loud?

 

They are balanced premiums. Not great but not completely terrible either. Just what people wanted or at least should have wanted. It's a shame the game has Patriots and Defenders already, that set the baseline pretty high for premium tanks.

 

I bought T92 and it's not that great... but it sure is FUN and that's what actually really should matter. Have fun, make credits. It's super fast, nimble and the gun is a laser pointer. Extremely high skill ceiling, and also carry potential in longer games especially if you can play vision games.

 



Jethro_Grey #2 Posted 28 December 2017 - 08:31 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 4284 battles
  • 534
  • [KAIN] KAIN
  • Member since:
    08-01-2015

Nobody gives a damn about average premium tanks. Average= no need to make a fuss about.

 

Although, it was mentioned in several threads about these specific tanks.



basin79 #3 Posted 28 December 2017 - 08:42 PM

    General

  • Player
  • 15351 battles
  • 8,659
  • Member since:
    03-13-2012

View PostTankkiPoju, on 28 December 2017 - 08:16 PM, said:

Have you guys noticed what WG did with these tanks, but no one really said it out loud?

 

They are balanced premiums. Not great but not completely terrible either. Just what people wanted or at least should have wanted. It's a shame the game has Patriots and Defenders already, that set the baseline pretty high for premium tanks.

 

I bought T92 and it's not that great... but it sure is FUN and that's what actually really should matter. Have fun, make credits. It's super fast, nimble and the gun is a laser pointer. Extremely high skill ceiling, and also carry potential in longer games especially if you can play vision games.

 

No one really said it out loud? Have you not read the comments on all the threads?



Search_Warrant #4 Posted 28 December 2017 - 08:43 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 26690 battles
  • 5,869
  • [LEWD] LEWD
  • Member since:
    02-08-2011

T92 is a good scout/passive spotter. but its still very bad with that gun it has, almost useless on most maps. Failbreaker as i have been vocal about already. it sucks.. really bad.. its not fun its not balanced its terrible. 20kmh is boring and when you get someone your worthless armor does nothing, your gun hits hard but good luck penning any tier 10. sad.

 

Yeh the tank would be balanced a long time ago. but this now and now its not good enough. also T92 should have the gun removed and give it godlike mobility/420 viewrange. id rather have no gun and a amazing scout than a slow piss shooter that cant turn for crap on rough ground.


Edited by Search_Warrant, 28 December 2017 - 08:44 PM.


trispect #5 Posted 28 December 2017 - 08:44 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Beta Tester
  • 33277 battles
  • 1,765
  • [HSOP] HSOP
  • Member since:
    01-16-2011
If there are actually good premium tanks around why bother with bad ones which still costs equally as much? Because this is what these tanks are: bad tanks. That's the word you were looking for when you wrote "balanced".

Edited by trispect, 28 December 2017 - 08:53 PM.


Search_Warrant #6 Posted 28 December 2017 - 08:46 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 26690 battles
  • 5,869
  • [LEWD] LEWD
  • Member since:
    02-08-2011

View Posttrispect, on 28 December 2017 - 07:44 PM, said:

If there are actually good premium tanks around why bother with bad ones which still costs equally as much? Because this is what these tanks are: bad tanks. That's the word you were looking for when you writed "balanced".

 

This. Bulldog got utterly destroyed after the autoloader removal, lets base a new prem on a worthless tank. bam. T92. im not sure about Failbreaker, i dunno if its an old prem that was outdated a long time ago now suddenly added or a new one that was spammed with weak spots to not make it "OP" or something.

commer #7 Posted 28 December 2017 - 09:35 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 38081 battles
  • 1,995
  • Member since:
    06-14-2011

View PostTankkiPoju, on 28 December 2017 - 08:16 PM, said:

Have you guys noticed what WG did with these tanks, but no one really said it out loud?

 

They are balanced premiums. Not great but not completely terrible either. Just what people wanted or at least should have wanted. It's a shame the game has Patriots and Defenders already, that set the baseline pretty high for premium tanks.

 

I bought T92 and it's not that great... but it sure is FUN and that's what actually really should matter. Have fun, make credits. It's super fast, nimble and the gun is a laser pointer. Extremely high skill ceiling, and also carry potential in longer games especially if you can play vision games.

 

 

Don't worry the forums noticed. This is why they are crying like little babies that their 440 alpha heavy with 400m view range has non OP armor or that the best in class gun handling and camo light tank has meh dpm. 

commer #8 Posted 28 December 2017 - 09:36 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 38081 battles
  • 1,995
  • Member since:
    06-14-2011

View Posttrispect, on 28 December 2017 - 08:44 PM, said:

If there are actually good premium tanks around why bother with bad ones which still costs equally as much? Because this is what these tanks are: bad tanks. That's the word you were looking for when you wrote "balanced".

 

Nope. They are balanced. They on average should give players same WR as their overal recent. Also I'd take t92 over most non rare prems like Skorp/Patriot

_Anarchistic_ #9 Posted 28 December 2017 - 10:01 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 36488 battles
  • 1,081
  • Member since:
    01-07-2015

https://www.youtube....h?v=o8pfdYgDQwQ

 

shish had some thoughts


Edited by _Anarchistic_, 28 December 2017 - 10:01 PM.


commer #10 Posted 28 December 2017 - 10:31 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 38081 battles
  • 1,995
  • Member since:
    06-14-2011

View Post_Anarchistic_, on 28 December 2017 - 10:01 PM, said:

https://www.youtube....h?v=o8pfdYgDQwQ

 

shish had some thoughts

 

This was perfect. People complain about a tank that still has 2nd best HP in class, best in class alpha only because there is a non prem variant of the tank that is OP. 

Browarszky #11 Posted 28 December 2017 - 11:21 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 15962 battles
  • 3,518
  • [I-S-L] I-S-L
  • Member since:
    12-03-2013
Is there some reason to pick the Mauerbrecher over the Löwe?

Search_Warrant #12 Posted 28 December 2017 - 11:24 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 26690 battles
  • 5,869
  • [LEWD] LEWD
  • Member since:
    02-08-2011

View PostBrowarszky, on 28 December 2017 - 10:21 PM, said:

Is there some reason to pick the Mauerbrecher over the Löwe?

 

Not a single one.

Hechaton #13 Posted 29 December 2017 - 12:15 AM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 44560 battles
  • 130
  • Member since:
    06-25-2014

have you actually played any of those tanks?

The t92 has an average damage of 150 and terrible pen.

the Nutcracker is terrible in every aspects.

 

I would say they are a little underpowered rather than "balanced".



trispect #14 Posted 29 December 2017 - 01:09 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Beta Tester
  • 33277 battles
  • 1,765
  • [HSOP] HSOP
  • Member since:
    01-16-2011

View PostHechaton, on 29 December 2017 - 01:15 AM, said:

have you actually played any of those tanks?

The t92 has an average damage of 150 and terrible pen.

the Nutcracker is terrible in every aspects.

 

I would say they are a little underpowered rather than "balanced".

 

Fast and unarmored tank which can't deal damage and very slow tank which anyone can get free damage from. I think that sums it up. 

 

I don't know if someone think these are "fun" but at least they are not competitive.



Spurtung #15 Posted 29 December 2017 - 02:56 AM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 61582 battles
  • 5,900
  • [GW-UP] GW-UP
  • Member since:
    07-05-2013

View PostSearch_Warrant, on 29 December 2017 - 12:24 AM, said:

View PostBrowarszky, on 28 December 2017 - 10:21 PM, said:

Is there some reason to pick the Mauerbrecher over the Löwe?

 

Not a single one.

There is one: the Löwe only trains 1 Loader.



Zirakss #16 Posted 29 December 2017 - 04:57 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 15154 battles
  • 425
  • [C__G] C__G
  • Member since:
    06-09-2012

View PostSpurtung, on 29 December 2017 - 02:56 AM, said:

There is one: the Löwe only trains 1 Loader.

 

The Maus, Mäuschen and VK 100.01 P all have two loaders. So that thing could work as crew trainer for your complete crew of your Maus, as a Löwe could not.

 

Except from that, the Löwe is the better tank.






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users