Jump to content


The 'FUNBREAKER'


  • Please log in to reply
80 replies to this topic

Amun_RA #1 Posted 28 December 2017 - 11:57 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 40878 battles
  • 272
  • Member since:
    09-27-2011

The Mauerbrecher (FUNBREAKER) is an underbalanced tank.

 

I don't want it to be OP, but balanced. And bad armor and so many weakspots plus poor mobility do not make it balanced but underpowered.

 

I love Maus and I've done the final missions for T55 A and Object 260 with it. I would love to have a tier 8 balanced premium Maus-like heavy. But this cannot be called a minimaus because it lacks the armor. 

 

Then what is the logic behind a premium tank in the line of Maus that has no good armor?

 

And please stop saying this is balanced due to all the weak spots because it sacrifices everything other than view range for armor. But again... It almost has no armor.

 

It's almost like a huge light tank with 20 km/h top speed, no traverse speed,  no camo, crappy gun and good view range.

 

I do not expect it to perform in tier 10 like Maus, but in tier 8 yes. That would be fun. WG should buff it in order to make it fun to play, but not making it OP.

 

I apologize but I don't know if I'll be able to respond to your posts.

 

And please don't say it is balanced if you haven't played it yourself and haven't managed to get good results in it. 



Coopsjc21 #2 Posted 29 December 2017 - 12:00 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 8114 battles
  • 664
  • Member since:
    07-14-2015
Shoulda got a VK100P, or whatever.

qpranger #3 Posted 29 December 2017 - 12:00 AM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 30735 battles
  • 5,061
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    12-25-2013

*
POPULAR

Man buys crappy premium tier 8 heavy.

Man realises he bought crappy premium tier 8 heavy.

Man posts on the forum about buying crappy premium tier 8 heavy.

Man does not look cool doing this.

Man looks for thread delete button.



TsundereWaffle #4 Posted 29 December 2017 - 12:02 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 25832 battles
  • 10,739
  • [LEWD] LEWD
  • Member since:
    03-31-2013

View Postqpranger, on 29 December 2017 - 12:00 AM, said:

Man buys crappy premium tier 8 heavy.

Man realises he bought crappy premium tier 8 heavy.

Man posts on the forum about buying crappy premium tier 8 heavy.

Man does not look cool doing this.

Man looks for thread delete button.

 

Man not hot?

Homer_J #5 Posted 29 December 2017 - 12:06 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 27085 battles
  • 27,726
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    09-03-2010

View Postqpranger, on 28 December 2017 - 11:00 PM, said:

Man buys crappy premium tier 8 heavy.

Man realises he bought crappy premium tier 8 heavy.

Man posts on the forum about buying crappy premium tier 8 heavy.

Man does not look cool doing this.

Man looks for thread delete button.

 

Man gets Q-pranged.

Amun_RA #6 Posted 29 December 2017 - 12:08 AM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 40878 battles
  • 272
  • Member since:
    09-27-2011

View Postqpranger, on 28 December 2017 - 11:00 PM, said:

Man buys crappy premium tier 8 heavy.

Man realises he bought crappy premium tier 8 heavy.

Man posts on the forum about buying crappy premium tier 8 heavy.

Man does not look cool doing this.

Man looks for thread delete button.

I do not regret buying it. I knew what I was doing. Seen reviews. But I love Maus and I collect tanks.

 

This is not the point. 

 

Important is only the fact that this tank is unique and it could be balanced in order to have fun playing it. 



signal11th #7 Posted 29 December 2017 - 03:22 AM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 33901 battles
  • 5,249
  • [E-BAY] E-BAY
  • Member since:
    07-14-2011

View PostAmun_RA, on 28 December 2017 - 11:08 PM, said:

I do not regret buying it. I knew what I was doing. Seen reviews. But I love Maus and I collect tanks.

 

This is not the point. 

 

Important is only the fact that this tank is unique and it could be balanced in order to have fun playing it. 

 

My Centurion/T95 is unique, then again seeing a cow with 3 knobs is as well doesn't mean I want to play with it.

Edited by signal11th, 29 December 2017 - 03:22 AM.


NUKLEAR_SLUG #8 Posted 29 December 2017 - 03:30 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 26628 battles
  • 1,618
  • Member since:
    06-13-2015

WG releases Chrysler with no frontal weakspots. Community whines. Demands weakspots on tanks.

WG releases VK with frontal weakspots. Community whines. Demands no weakspots on tanks.



Search_Warrant #9 Posted 29 December 2017 - 08:48 AM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 25990 battles
  • 5,330
  • [LEWD] LEWD
  • Member since:
    02-08-2011

View PostNUKLEAR_SLUG, on 29 December 2017 - 02:30 AM, said:

WG releases Chrysler with no frontal weakspots. Community whines. Demands weakspots on tanks.

WG releases VK with frontal weakspots. Community whines. Demands no weakspots on tanks.

 

1 is medium tank mobility. the other goes 20 and turns like a beached whale. thats why. its not all about the armor.

Bludsuager #10 Posted 29 December 2017 - 08:56 AM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 11685 battles
  • 287
  • Member since:
    09-07-2014

This tank isn't/wasn't like the panther 8,8 release, people who bought it could full well research the properties, armor models etc. And just like in communism it is just like in world of tanks: Some tanks are more balanced (equal) than others.

 

And i think this has great meaning in the case of the brick: Caveat Emptor.

 

So no and as always, research what you buy!



Belgalisk #11 Posted 29 December 2017 - 09:21 AM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 25945 battles
  • 132
  • [NEAT] NEAT
  • Member since:
    01-24-2013

Indeed. The video below, where the new tier VIII "super heavy" gets penetrated by a tier IV,  was posted on Dec 24th, so you knew what you were buying and hence it is perfectly balanced.

 



Amun_RA #12 Posted 29 December 2017 - 10:23 AM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 40878 battles
  • 272
  • Member since:
    09-27-2011

View PostNUKLEAR_SLUG, on 29 December 2017 - 02:30 AM, said:

WG releases Chrysler with no frontal weakspots. Community whines. Demands weakspots on tanks.

WG releases VK with frontal weakspots. Community whines. Demands no weakspots on tanks.

 

Stop over simplifying  the problem. If you do not have any good arguments, please don't comment. 

 

View PostBludsuager, on 29 December 2017 - 07:56 AM, said:

This tank isn't/wasn't like the panther 8,8 release, people who bought it could full well research the properties, armor models etc. And just like in communism it is just like in world of tanks: Some tanks are more balanced (equal) than others.

 

And i think this has great meaning in the case of the brick: Caveat Emptor.

 

So no and as always, research what you buy!

 

I've already said that I knew what I bought. The point is that I would like this tank to be a little more competitive, because I like that it could play like Maus. 

 

I think there is very much hate in this forum towards people who buy tanks. 


 

malachi6 #13 Posted 29 December 2017 - 10:28 AM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 48623 battles
  • 3,088
  • Member since:
    04-14-2011

View Postqpranger, on 29 December 2017 - 12:00 AM, said:

Man buys crappy premium tier 8 heavy.

Man realises he bought crappy premium tier 8 heavy.

Man posts on the forum about buying crappy premium tier 8 heavy.

Man does not look cool doing this.

Man looks for thread delete button.

 

The Irony of qpranger talking about looking cool with the amount of vomit he posts...

Amun_RA #14 Posted 29 December 2017 - 10:34 AM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 40878 battles
  • 272
  • Member since:
    09-27-2011

View PostBelgalisk, on 29 December 2017 - 08:21 AM, said:

Indeed. The video below, where the new tier VIII "super heavy" gets penetrated by a tier IV,  was posted on Dec 24th, so you knew what you were buying and hence it is perfectly balanced.

 

 

This video just proves what I've said, that this tank is underbalanced. And I do not see any reason why a premium tank should be worse or better than it's non-premium counterparts.

This is a game and it should be fun playing everything. 



Amun_RA #15 Posted 29 December 2017 - 10:38 AM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 40878 battles
  • 272
  • Member since:
    09-27-2011

View Postsignal11th, on 29 December 2017 - 02:22 AM, said:

 

My Centurion/T95 is unique, then again seeing a cow with 3 knobs is as well doesn't mean I want to play with it.

 

But you still play a game, this game. Stop being so arrogant, you do not achieve anything. 



SirTogII #16 Posted 29 December 2017 - 10:49 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 46417 battles
  • 541
  • [REQT] REQT
  • Member since:
    11-27-2012
My IS6 struggled meeting this yesterday. Angled correctly and hiding the weak spots as well as you can, it’s going to out trade a lot of tier 8’s. Still going to be practically useless against higher tiers tho and totally inflexible, not my cup of tea

PowderBunny #17 Posted 29 December 2017 - 10:57 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 29787 battles
  • 45
  • Member since:
    08-30-2012

View PostAmun_RA, on 29 December 2017 - 10:27 AM, said:

 

I've already said that I knew what I bought. The point is that I would like this tank to be a little more competitive, because I like that it could play like Maus. 

 

I think there is very much hate in this forum towards people who buy tanks. 

If you bought it because of its "uniqueness" and your being a  collector, why do you need an extra post here? If you had warned to buy this tank because it is far worse then the VK100, that might have been ok (since it has been told many times over). But buying a tank knowing about its bad performance, and suggesting it needs a buff , just seems preposterous.



qpranger #18 Posted 29 December 2017 - 11:46 AM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 30735 battles
  • 5,061
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    12-25-2013

View Postmalachi6, on 29 December 2017 - 11:28 AM, said:

 

The Irony of qpranger talking about looking cool with the amount of vomit he posts...

 

Do you really want to hurt me?

Do you really want to make me cry?



Timber_Wulf #19 Posted 29 December 2017 - 12:04 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Beta Tester
  • 26827 battles
  • 583
  • Member since:
    07-22-2010

I really like this tank tbh. 

 



Haikonnen #20 Posted 29 December 2017 - 12:06 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 24803 battles
  • 150
  • Member since:
    08-01-2013

View PostNUKLEAR_SLUG, on 29 December 2017 - 03:30 AM, said:

WG releases Chrysler with no frontal weakspots. Community whines. Demands weakspots on tanks.

WG releases VK with frontal weakspots. Community whines. Demands no weakspots on tanks.

 

Bulls***..... he's just asking for it to be balanced a bit better. I can understand that... I have seen QB's video about that tank and I have seen another video where Mauerbrachar was penned by a tier 4 tank (That premium T28) from the front with relative ease... that tank simply isn't a super heavy.

 

I wasn't dumb enough to buy that fat piece of metal, but I get why so many ppl whiine about it. First WG releases an OP crap tanks, then they realise their mistake and rush in to release an UP tank ... :D why can't they just take time to release a well balanced tank for once.

 

Sigh






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users