Jump to content


So RNG is fun


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
46 replies to this topic

Yesteryear #1 Posted 31 December 2017 - 02:14 AM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 8074 battles
  • 55
  • [22DAB] 22DAB
  • Member since:
    01-29-2012
i boguht myself 150 loot boxes, and my mate who has less than 100 battles 75 , i got nothing he gets this https://imgur.com/a/jAKYH aaaaaaaaarfghasujkhdsjkhedkjahsdjkahdlkhesflHSDFjkSHFlEHFlSDKFJLKHRfkjhflkHLKHJFSEF

qpranger #2 Posted 31 December 2017 - 02:16 AM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 32457 battles
  • 5,061
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    12-25-2013
Buy more boxes.

Enforcer1975 #3 Posted 31 December 2017 - 02:21 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 20760 battles
  • 10,859
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    05-04-2014
So you really.....got.....nothing?

Yesteryear #4 Posted 31 December 2017 - 03:57 AM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 8074 battles
  • 55
  • [22DAB] 22DAB
  • Member since:
    01-29-2012
got it after 225 euro of boxes for myself lol

Yesteryear #5 Posted 31 December 2017 - 03:57 AM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 8074 battles
  • 55
  • [22DAB] 22DAB
  • Member since:
    01-29-2012

300 euro even 

225* boxes



Phobos4321 #6 Posted 31 December 2017 - 04:07 AM

    General

  • Player
  • 43226 battles
  • 8,397
  • Member since:
    09-27-2011

because the type is worth it and not just a total hyped and overrated tank ...

while you could have gotten a T-34-3 for like 30 € ...

 

well at least you should have now a large amount of gold and other stuff



Hotwired #7 Posted 31 December 2017 - 04:37 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Beta Tester
  • 28741 battles
  • 490
  • Member since:
    09-12-2010

Someone will be along to say it's ok because you got a load of other things.

 

So if you add up the WG price for the other things you got you'll feel better about spending €300 in WG's Christmas casino.

 

 



Hedgehog1963 #8 Posted 31 December 2017 - 05:07 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 51282 battles
  • 7,471
  • [DIRTY] DIRTY
  • Member since:
    04-26-2011

View PostPhobos4321, on 31 December 2017 - 03:07 AM, said:

because the type is worth it and not just a total hyped and overrated tank ...

while you could have gotten a T-34-3 for like 30 € ...

 

 

 

Are you suggesting T-34-3 is anything like Type 59?

Phobos4321 #9 Posted 31 December 2017 - 05:08 AM

    General

  • Player
  • 43226 battles
  • 8,397
  • Member since:
    09-27-2011
is nayone of both a must have ? no so arent they the same ?

brumbarr #10 Posted 31 December 2017 - 06:46 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 38626 battles
  • 6,326
  • Member since:
    07-30-2012

View PostHedgehog1963, on 31 December 2017 - 05:07 AM, said:

 

Are you suggesting T-34-3 is anything like Type 59?

They are the same tank with a different gun, so yes ;)



_T_1_T_4_N_0_ #11 Posted 31 December 2017 - 07:13 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 31119 battles
  • 1,114
  • [SQCI] SQCI
  • Member since:
    02-17-2015
Well here is a double edge sword as I purchased a single x3 modern box and got a Type 59 on the 2nd or 3rd day of the advent.
The double edge sword is that my opinion is that the Type 59 is absolute dirt and is an extremely poor prem after many years of power creep.
I didn't have a Chinese prem so hey, but wow its mweh.

I have been a bit stupid as over Xmas with the credit rush and discounts needed a bit of gold and keep buying single 3 packs rather than gold and think I have spent about £30 or more now.
But at least I now have the AC T4 and others and if I ever do play it,  can say "Hey look its got a jobby on the front of it, Phnnrrr!".

I would of much preffered the Lorr than the Type 59 but hey that is RNG for you.

Edited by DumbNumpty, 31 December 2017 - 07:13 AM.


Phobos4321 #12 Posted 31 December 2017 - 07:16 AM

    General

  • Player
  • 43226 battles
  • 8,397
  • Member since:
    09-27-2011

well wanting the lor you got other means

 

type is just about the hype  and part of that is its rarety and that was just decreased



Spurtung #13 Posted 31 December 2017 - 07:33 AM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 63655 battles
  • 5,900
  • [GW-UP] GW-UP
  • Member since:
    07-05-2013

View PostCapt_Peter_Love, on 31 December 2017 - 04:57 AM, said:

300 euro even 

225* boxes

 

I'd say, well done WG's economic department, well done.

Edited by Spurtung, 31 December 2017 - 07:34 AM.


malachi6 #14 Posted 31 December 2017 - 07:40 AM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 49897 battles
  • 3,455
  • Member since:
    04-14-2011
Another person that does not realise you can lose when gambling.

_T_1_T_4_N_0_ #15 Posted 31 December 2017 - 07:43 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 31119 battles
  • 1,114
  • [SQCI] SQCI
  • Member since:
    02-17-2015

View PostPhobos4321, on 31 December 2017 - 07:16 AM, said:

well wanting the lor you got other means

 

type is just about the hype  and part of that is its rarety and that was just decreased

 

Yeah I haven't done badly and the boxes where great value, the Tombola of prizes is what it is and did OK.
Should of just got 11 or 25 with discounts and left alone and buying single 3 packs was my bad, but in general its seems WG where pretty generous and currently running at a constant 48% bonus with the modern bonus & 36% on the rest.
So not to shabby but that is RNG for for you.
Type 59 was the myth of rarity and for me that has been firmly dispelled :)
PS didn't bother with the Lorr as the Blackdog has been earning creds for me this xmas.

Edited by DumbNumpty, 31 December 2017 - 07:46 AM.


Havenless #16 Posted 31 December 2017 - 07:51 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 454 battles
  • 435
  • [-UM] -UM
  • Member since:
    12-18-2014

View PostHedgehog1963, on 31 December 2017 - 07:07 AM, said:

 

Are you suggesting T-34-3 is anything like Type 59?

 

Fundamentally the two are a very similar. The only differences are in the gun, ammo capacity and gun depression departments. The mobility, view range, camo etc. are either identical or very close. Since the buff I think I like Type slightly better but the difference is much smaller than people are making of it, and the tanks do play very similarly.

JocMeister #17 Posted 31 December 2017 - 08:35 AM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 23258 battles
  • 2,110
  • [-MM] -MM
  • Member since:
    08-03-2015

View PostCapt_Peter_Love, on 31 December 2017 - 02:14 AM, said:

i boguht myself 150 loot boxes, and my mate who has less than 100 battles 75 , i got nothing he gets this https://imgur.com/a/jAKYH aaaaaaaaarfghasujkhdsjkhedkjahsdjkahdlkhesflHSDFjkSHFlEHFlSDKFJLKHRfkjhflkHLKHJFSEF

 

I got a Lorraine and Type in a 11 box pack.

 

:trollface:



LepiSale #18 Posted 31 December 2017 - 08:39 AM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 47752 battles
  • 231
  • Member since:
    03-12-2013

View Postqpranger, on 31 December 2017 - 02:16 AM, said:

Buy more boxes.

 

:teethhappy:

Hedgehog1963 #19 Posted 31 December 2017 - 09:28 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 51282 battles
  • 7,471
  • [DIRTY] DIRTY
  • Member since:
    04-26-2011

View PostHavenless, on 31 December 2017 - 06:51 AM, said:

 

Fundamentally the two are a very similar. The only differences are in the gun, ammo capacity and gun depression departments. The mobility, view range, camo etc. are either identical or very close. Since the buff I think I like Type slightly better but the difference is much smaller than people are making of it, and the tanks do play very similarly.

 

Those "only differences" define why the Type 59 is far superior to the T-34-3.

Hedgehog1963 #20 Posted 31 December 2017 - 09:29 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 51282 battles
  • 7,471
  • [DIRTY] DIRTY
  • Member since:
    04-26-2011

View Postbrumbarr, on 31 December 2017 - 05:46 AM, said:

They are the same tank with a different gun, so yes ;)

 

:facepalm:




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users