Jump to content


Your "tin foil hat theories" here.

Your craziest ideas no judgie

  • Please log in to reply
83 replies to this topic

TEMELJNI #1 Posted 01 January 2018 - 03:16 AM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 21816 battles
  • 127
  • [L_T_D] L_T_D
  • Member since:
    08-11-2014
Ill go first.

I am confident without shadow of a doubt that there are WG employees payed to throw games (lose intentionally for those unacquainted with the term "throwing the game" )  . 

Edited by TEMELJNI, 01 January 2018 - 03:16 AM.


Enforcer1975 #2 Posted 01 January 2018 - 03:23 AM

    General

  • Player
  • 18361 battles
  • 9,839
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    05-04-2014
Replays where you identified said WG employees?

unhappy_bunny #3 Posted 01 January 2018 - 03:24 AM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 17409 battles
  • 2,131
  • [-OC-] -OC-
  • Member since:
    08-01-2012

Tell us more. 

What leads you to this confident belief? 



TEMELJNI #4 Posted 01 January 2018 - 03:26 AM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 21816 battles
  • 127
  • [L_T_D] L_T_D
  • Member since:
    08-11-2014
This would be a thread for tin foil hat theories, not explanation of those. If you want tin foil hat theories explained go watch history or discovery. 

Balc0ra #5 Posted 01 January 2018 - 03:27 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 62764 battles
  • 14,378
  • [WALL] WALL
  • Member since:
    07-10-2012
I'm fairly sure some players are payed by WG to come here and post tin foil hat theories to trow the forum off the things they normally complain about that week.

Enforcer1975 #6 Posted 01 January 2018 - 03:29 AM

    General

  • Player
  • 18361 battles
  • 9,839
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    05-04-2014
Ok then i'll throw one in...
I'm 100% sure that TEMELJNI watches too many conspiratard videos on youtube.

unhappy_bunny #7 Posted 01 January 2018 - 03:31 AM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 17409 battles
  • 2,131
  • [-OC-] -OC-
  • Member since:
    08-01-2012

View PostTEMELJNI, on 01 January 2018 - 03:26 AM, said:

This would be a thread for tin foil hat theories, not explanation of those. If you want tin foil hat theories explained go watch history or discovery. 

 

Good point. Sorry.

 

 



bitslice #8 Posted 01 January 2018 - 03:32 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 21680 battles
  • 541
  • Member since:
    12-28-2013

I'm pretty sure that despite asking for game suggestions, WG don't actually give a flying monkey shite about what we think...

 

I know, totally out there man

 



Strappster #9 Posted 01 January 2018 - 05:11 AM

    General

  • Player
  • 23556 battles
  • 8,746
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    10-20-2015
Some players will consider any half-baked nonsense to be feasible before they'd even think of looking at how they could improve their own gameplay.

TEMELJNI #10 Posted 01 January 2018 - 05:20 AM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 21816 battles
  • 127
  • [L_T_D] L_T_D
  • Member since:
    08-11-2014

View PostStrappster, on 01 January 2018 - 05:11 AM, said:

Some players will consider any half-baked nonsense to be feasible before they'd even think of looking at how they could improve their own gameplay.

 

Sir, please refrain yourself from stating facts. This is theory thread ment for laughs and giggles not insulting. Thank you.

Strappster #11 Posted 01 January 2018 - 05:43 AM

    General

  • Player
  • 23556 battles
  • 8,746
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    10-20-2015

View PostTEMELJNI, on 01 January 2018 - 04:20 AM, said:

Sir, please refrain yourself from stating facts. This is theory thread ment for laughs and giggles not insulting. Thank you.

 

What makes you think I'm not laughing at those players?

Homer_J #12 Posted 01 January 2018 - 06:29 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 27023 battles
  • 27,664
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    09-03-2010

View PostTEMELJNI, on 01 January 2018 - 02:16 AM, said:


I am confident without shadow of a doubt that there are WG employees payed to throw games (lose intentionally for those unacquainted with the term "throwing the game" )  . 

 

I firmly believe there are WG employees who post stupid stuff to the forum just to keep us occupied/entertained/distracted.

Strappster #13 Posted 01 January 2018 - 06:50 AM

    General

  • Player
  • 23556 battles
  • 8,746
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    10-20-2015

View PostHomer_J, on 01 January 2018 - 05:29 AM, said:

I firmly believe there are WG employees who post stupid stuff to the forum just to keep us occupied/entertained/distracted.

 

Where do I apply? I've been doing it for free all this time when I could have been gainfully employed. :angry:



logaritmusnaturalis #14 Posted 01 January 2018 - 06:51 AM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 1703 battles
  • 273
  • Member since:
    05-11-2012

View PostTEMELJNI, on 01 January 2018 - 02:16 AM, said:

Ill go first.

I am confident without shadow of a doubt that there are WG employees payed to throw games (lose intentionally for those unacquainted with the term "throwing the game" )  . 

 

That'd cost way too much. 

shane73tank #15 Posted 01 January 2018 - 09:32 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 26312 battles
  • 1,924
  • [USAGI] USAGI
  • Member since:
    03-01-2014

All but a few of you are wg employees/bots whose job it is to keep this the worlds  “most

active forum” and to keep Donald Trump in power and sell Fort Knox deals



gunslingerXXX #16 Posted 01 January 2018 - 09:51 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 9951 battles
  • 1,397
  • Member since:
    11-16-2014
Playing stock tanks puts you on the bad RNG team more often

Spek_en_Bonen #17 Posted 01 January 2018 - 09:58 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Beta Tester
  • 31489 battles
  • 6,808
  • Member since:
    07-27-2010

When the servers are busy, you get more and more 15-0, 15-1, 15-2, 15-3 results.

My theory is that WG servers can't handle that many LOOOOOONG matches.

One team is doomed to fail. 

 

Turn on "free xp bonus"  and get loss after loss.

 

 

 



Ankara_Aatu #18 Posted 01 January 2018 - 10:11 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 31640 battles
  • 562
  • [RIOD] RIOD
  • Member since:
    04-11-2015

- They know when you are grinding a tank you don't like, and to rub salt in your wounds they give you braindead teammates.

 

- They know when you are grinding for credits, and to make you buy Fort Knox instead, they make you play against a craptonne of Type 4/5 so you spam HEAT and lose credits.

 

- "They" are actually lizards.



Strappster #19 Posted 01 January 2018 - 10:42 AM

    General

  • Player
  • 23556 battles
  • 8,746
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    10-20-2015

View PostAnkara_Aatu, on 01 January 2018 - 09:11 AM, said:

- They know when you are grinding a tank you don't like, and to rub salt in your wounds they give you braindead teammates.

 

- They know when you are grinding for credits, and to make you buy Fort Knox instead, they make you play against a craptonne of Type 4/5 so you spam HEAT and lose credits.

 

- "They" are actually lizards.

 

I'm not sure that the WG business model involves annoying their players so much that they quit the game. :unsure:

 

The lizard thing explains a lot though. :hiding:



DracheimFlug #20 Posted 01 January 2018 - 11:01 AM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 8925 battles
  • 3,710
  • Member since:
    11-13-2014
Weird Al Yankovik plays WoT and wrote 'Foil' just to convince people that aluminium foil hats having protective powers is just a crackpot conspiracy theory, thereby allowing him a higher win rate against the masses foolish enough to play without such protection! :ohmy:




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users