Jump to content


907


  • Please log in to reply
78 replies to this topic

Ceeb #1 Posted 03 January 2018 - 10:44 PM

    Major General

  • Beta Tester
  • 30079 battles
  • 5,172
  • Member since:
    01-14-2011

Respect to the guys that got the 907... 

 

But its ruining Tier 10.... influx off them tonight...



Jumping_Turtle #2 Posted 03 January 2018 - 10:50 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 60450 battles
  • 5,185
  • [CNUT] CNUT
  • Member since:
    10-15-2013
it's ruining random, clanwars and ranking mode ...

RamRaid90 #3 Posted 03 January 2018 - 10:53 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 20586 battles
  • 6,286
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    12-14-2014

It's broken and completely overpowered. Anyone who disagrees with that, is a 907 owner.

 

However I have seen some complete scrubs playing them at the moment...top klanu still selling slots to pubbies to keep the lights on?



EltvilleTiger #4 Posted 03 January 2018 - 10:57 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 21016 battles
  • 1,559
  • [BBMM] BBMM
  • Member since:
    08-24-2011
Agreed.  This thing is OP and reminds me of the first year of the Type59 when it just did anything it wanted to on the battlefield.  

Derethim #5 Posted 03 January 2018 - 10:59 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 17135 battles
  • 1,868
  • Member since:
    04-03-2012

View PostEltvilleTiger, on 03 January 2018 - 10:57 PM, said:

Agreed.  This thing is OP and reminds me of the first year of the Type59 when it just did anything it wanted to on the battlefield.  

 

Double agreed, it's another T-59, maybe worse.

Laur_Balaur_XD #6 Posted 03 January 2018 - 11:03 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 35393 battles
  • 640
  • Member since:
    04-20-2011
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!

How_hard_can_it_be #7 Posted 03 January 2018 - 11:03 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 40026 battles
  • 2,000
  • Member since:
    09-18-2012
It's been on my agenda to stomp those little abominations since one encounter where I ambushed 1 Ob.907 from behind ( he was a 1 shot for me ). I had the last shell in magazine in my batchat 25t and I found the rear of his turret cupolas sticking out above rock and all I had to do was to hit it. So I did. A couple of seconds later, in garage, I was contemplating about a lot of serious grown up stuff - like selling bat chat - but then I calmed down to check the 907 model on tanks.gg. WG blyatbalance thinks the rear of cupolas on medium tanks need ~250-330 mm of armour. DA DA DA DA ! Putinland must be da best forever and ever !

Edited by How_hard_can_it_be, 03 January 2018 - 11:04 PM.


shane73tank #8 Posted 03 January 2018 - 11:04 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 27428 battles
  • 1,989
  • [USAGI] USAGI
  • Member since:
    03-01-2014

View PostCeeb, on 03 January 2018 - 09:44 PM, said:

Respect to the guys that got the 907... 

 

But its ruining Tier 10.... influx off them tonight...

 

I could not agree more, especially re hats off to whoever worked their nuts off to get one, but it is a crazy tank to play against 

Thrael7 #9 Posted 03 January 2018 - 11:04 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 22984 battles
  • 1,912
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    11-17-2012
Considering I mostly play up to Tier9 I can't say they 're ruining my T10 experience. Although I keep meeting them in my T8s... :trollface:

HaZardeur #10 Posted 03 January 2018 - 11:05 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Beta Tester
  • 33257 battles
  • 1,161
  • Member since:
    08-14-2010

View PostEltvilleTiger, on 03 January 2018 - 10:57 PM, said:

Agreed.  This thing is OP and reminds me of the first year of the T-22 when it just did anything it wanted to on the battlefield.  

 

Fixed



Pansenmann #11 Posted 03 January 2018 - 11:08 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 33678 battles
  • 12,399
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    08-17-2012

View PostThrael7, on 03 January 2018 - 11:04 PM, said:

Considering I mostly play up to Tier9 I can't say they 're ruining my T10 experience. Although I keep meeting them in my T8s... :trollface:

 

just love that avatar picture :girl:

Dr_Oolen #12 Posted 03 January 2018 - 11:10 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 20602 battles
  • 1,556
  • [IDEAL] IDEAL
  • Member since:
    03-13-2012

Hmm, last time i checked 907 was the only t10 medium good enough to be able to contest all the OP heavies. If there was no 907 literally the whole campaign would have been 12 v 12 heavies + 1 light/batchat + 2 cancers. That would surely be less broken than having 3-5 907s out of 15 tanks. Kappa

 

All the mediums should be buffed to the levels of 907, as thats what they have to be not to be strictly and objectively worse than the heavies overall.



Derethim #13 Posted 03 January 2018 - 11:17 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 17135 battles
  • 1,868
  • Member since:
    04-03-2012

View PostDr_Oolen, on 03 January 2018 - 11:10 PM, said:

 

All the mediums should be buffed to the levels of 907, as thats what they have to be not to be strictly and objectively worse than the heavies overall.

WRONG

 

There is WAY less OP tanks, than underpowered tanks.

Tier X is already too much DPM, too much Armor, too much viewrange and too much speed and maneuvreability, which results in fast steamrolls frequently. This is why the longest games are around tier 4-7, these are way more balanced. If you buff all meds, just because you can't pen a retarded-OP Type 5 and Maus you strenghten the steamroll meta. One mistake in a tier X match right now is near-death.


Edited by Derethim, 03 January 2018 - 11:17 PM.


_Bundesheer_ #14 Posted 03 January 2018 - 11:17 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 29505 battles
  • 2,114
  • Member since:
    08-20-2011
Just undo the buff. It was completly unneccessary.

CoDiGGo #15 Posted 03 January 2018 - 11:18 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 14873 battles
  • 568
  • [MOARR] MOARR
  • Member since:
    05-10-2015

And Defender, T3486M.... difficult or impossible to get top tanks dominating sh6, sh8, sh10... coincidence? :bush:


Edited by CoDiGGo, 04 January 2018 - 02:44 AM.


HundeWurst #16 Posted 03 January 2018 - 11:22 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 67756 battles
  • 4,281
  • [FAME] FAME
  • Member since:
    02-06-2012

View PostRamRaid90, on 03 January 2018 - 10:53 PM, said:

It's broken and completely overpowered. Anyone who disagrees with that, is a 907 owner.

 

However I have seen some complete scrubs playing them at the moment...top klanu still selling slots to pubbies to keep the lights on?

 

And that where you are wrong kiddo.

 

A lot of 907 owners, including me, know and said more than once that the 907 in its current state is total [edited]and needs a nerf.



soul3ater #17 Posted 03 January 2018 - 11:22 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 18673 battles
  • 635
  • Member since:
    07-27-2012

The buff was totally unnecessary.

 

I think at this point everyone agrees that it's broken, whether you own it or not. 



Uebergewicht #18 Posted 03 January 2018 - 11:27 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 11702 battles
  • 1,035
  • [ATD] ATD
  • Member since:
    11-15-2015

View PostCoDiGGo, on 03 January 2018 - 11:18 PM, said:

T3486M.... difficult or impossible to get and top tanks... coincidence? :bush:

 

The 85m was ridiculously easy to get, come on.



brumbarr #19 Posted 03 January 2018 - 11:30 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 38626 battles
  • 6,326
  • Member since:
    07-30-2012

While the 907 is indeed the best T10 med, and is OP compared to them. It is still not objectivly OP compared to heavys and is as good if not worse as them.

 

THe one thing I would liek to se changed is the hull armor, its jsut too troll and random and annoying AF



Hedgehog1963 #20 Posted 03 January 2018 - 11:30 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 50924 battles
  • 7,356
  • [DIRTY] DIRTY
  • Member since:
    04-26-2011

Not that tough...

Posted Image






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users