Jump to content


A gem in the dirt

T25/2 underrated

  • Please log in to reply
47 replies to this topic

JocMeister #41 Posted 05 January 2018 - 04:43 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 28006 battles
  • 2,655
  • Member since:
    08-03-2015

Rebought it recently as well.

 

IMO its a pretty sold tank. Its more like the Jackson in gameplay as its slow as F. Gun actually hits where you aim though which is what I hated the most about the Hellcat/Jackson not doing. But the Hellcat is a lot better because of the speed. But the T25/2 is IMO better tier for tier than the Jackson.

 

Personally I don´t really like it that much as its too slow. But it does what its supposed to pretty well. 



JocMeister #42 Posted 05 January 2018 - 04:47 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 28006 battles
  • 2,655
  • Member since:
    08-03-2015

View PostStrappster, on 05 January 2018 - 12:51 PM, said:

 

If we all liked the same tanks, it'd be a very boring game. :)

 

I didn't mind the Chi-Ri but it's so big that you need to apply for planning permission whenever you park it, the armour is both flat and thin and the auto-loader makes it a one-trick pony, albeit a relatively fun trick when you can pen the target. I recently re-bought the Chi-To though, I preferred playing that grind to playing through the Cromwell.

 

Chi-To is without a doubt the WORST tier 6 medium in the game. :confused: Moves like a heavy, have no armor and 155 alpha....the lack of mobility just kills it flat out. Only thing the tank has going for it is the depression but the turret is absolute garbage so you can really use it effectively.

 

If any tank needs a buff its the Chi-To. It needs to have a serious mobility buff.


Edited by JocMeister, 05 January 2018 - 04:48 PM.


BrinklyWollox #43 Posted 05 January 2018 - 04:56 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 27533 battles
  • 11,116
  • Member since:
    10-20-2015

View PostJocMeister, on 05 January 2018 - 03:47 PM, said:

Chi-To is without a doubt the WORST tier 6 medium in the game. :confused: Moves like a heavy, have no armor and 155 alpha....the lack of mobility just kills it flat out. Only thing the tank has going for it is the depression but the turret is absolute garbage so you can really use it effectively.

 

If any tank needs a buff its the Chi-To. It needs to have a serious mobility buff.

 

It's even worse than you think - it's 155mm pen, the alpha is 130. :)

Dava_117 #44 Posted 05 January 2018 - 04:58 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 22679 battles
  • 5,094
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    12-17-2014

View PostJocMeister, on 05 January 2018 - 04:47 PM, said:

 

Chi-To is without a doubt the WORST tier 6 medium in the game. :confused: Moves like a heavy, have no armor and 155 alpha....the lack of mobility just kills it flat out. Only thing the tank has going for it is the depression but the turret is absolute garbage so you can really use it effectively.

 

If any tank needs a buff its the Chi-To. It needs to have a serious mobility buff.

 

Well, it's supposed to be a support tank, so mobility is not that problem. It sports a good 155mm pen and 135 damage is the same as Cromwell. The only problem is that is a lot team dependant. 

JocMeister #45 Posted 05 January 2018 - 05:47 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 28006 battles
  • 2,655
  • Member since:
    08-03-2015

View PostStrappster, on 05 January 2018 - 04:56 PM, said:

 

It's even worse than you think - it's 155mm pen, the alpha is 130. :)

 

Holy...:teethhappy:

JocMeister #46 Posted 05 January 2018 - 05:48 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 28006 battles
  • 2,655
  • Member since:
    08-03-2015

View PostDava_117, on 05 January 2018 - 04:58 PM, said:

 

Well, it's supposed to be a support tank, so mobility is not that problem. It sports a good 155mm pen and 135 damage is the same as Cromwell. The only problem is that is a lot team dependant. 

 

Bad mobility on a MT is always a problem...

Dava_117 #47 Posted 05 January 2018 - 05:59 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 22679 battles
  • 5,094
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    12-17-2014

View PostJocMeister, on 05 January 2018 - 05:48 PM, said:

 

Bad mobility on a MT is always a problem...

 

Yes, but if I had to chose a buff, I would prefere a slightly pen buff (to enhance the support role) or DPM (it lacks a bit) or the VR (to increase carry potential).

JocMeister #48 Posted 05 January 2018 - 06:16 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 28006 battles
  • 2,655
  • Member since:
    08-03-2015

View PostDava_117, on 05 January 2018 - 05:59 PM, said:

 

Yes, but if I had to chose a buff, I would prefere a slightly pen buff (to enhance the support role) or DPM (it lacks a bit) or the VR (to increase carry potential).

 

Different playstyle I guess. :) I would take a mobility buff over any of those. IMO mobility is what gives carry potential. 





Also tagged with T25/2, underrated

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users