Jump to content


Disgusting

bot afk no ban

  • Please log in to reply
82 replies to this topic

Secret2ndAccount #1 Posted 06 January 2018 - 12:55 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 2020 battles
  • 26
  • Member since:
    08-17-2016

A few example of finest team mates seen battles today. How these "players" are not permanently banned yet? 

 

Spoiler

 

Spoiler

 

Spoiler

 

Spoiler

 

Spoiler

 

Spoiler

 



SovietBias #2 Posted 06 January 2018 - 12:59 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 37406 battles
  • 1,310
  • Member since:
    06-10-2013
WG does not care. It helps fill the servers and our salt levels.

Edited by SovietBias, 06 January 2018 - 01:22 AM.


G01ngToxicCommand0 #3 Posted 06 January 2018 - 01:19 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 37465 battles
  • 727
  • Member since:
    11-03-2011
This is why I play toxic only now; too much *edit playing the game and the best part is that Wargaming doesn't care one bit.

Edited by Jbnn, 06 January 2018 - 10:37 AM.
This post has been edited by the moderation team due to inappropriate remarks.


HeidenSieker #4 Posted 06 January 2018 - 01:20 AM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 10046 battles
  • 4,650
  • Member since:
    03-26-2016

View PostSecret2ndAccount, on 06 January 2018 - 12:55 AM, said:

A few example of finest team mates seen battles today. How these "players" are not permanently banned yet? 

 

Why do you imagine that they should be banned, please?



View PostG01ngToxicCommand0, on 06 January 2018 - 01:19 AM, said:

This is why I play toxic only now; too much *edit playing the game and the best part is that Wargaming doesn't care one bit.

 

To you and the OP: so you'd support a skill-based matchmaker, then? If not, why not?



Secret2ndAccount #5 Posted 06 January 2018 - 01:28 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 2020 battles
  • 26
  • Member since:
    08-17-2016

View PostHeidenSieker, on 06 January 2018 - 01:20 AM, said:

 

Why do you imagine that they should be banned, please?

 

World of Tanks - Game Rules

 Inappropriate conduct in game / Fair play principles

  4.0.7 



TheComfyChair #6 Posted 06 January 2018 - 01:36 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 7570 battles
  • 743
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    03-20-2017
:popcorn:

logaritmusnaturalis #7 Posted 06 January 2018 - 01:46 AM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 1703 battles
  • 273
  • Member since:
    05-11-2012
Holidays are the worst time when it comes to teams. I've felt this as well.

Temid23 #8 Posted 06 January 2018 - 02:01 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 53233 battles
  • 689
  • [G-STR] G-STR
  • Member since:
    12-20-2013

@OP

Just for the record:

In witch blessed and superior to all others countries, your amazing "gift to the world" person managed to be born (by pure RNG chance btw.)?

:girl:



G01ngToxicCommand0 #9 Posted 06 January 2018 - 02:02 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 37465 battles
  • 727
  • Member since:
    11-03-2011

View PostHeidenSieker, on 06 January 2018 - 01:23 AM, said:

 

To you and the OP: so you'd support a skill-based matchmaker, then? If not, why not?

 

Yes I'd like a skill based matchmaking. It will mean a 50/50 win rate but the games would not be so frustrating to play because the on the higher skilled teams you can expect the individual players to be able to carry their own wesight and you know in advance that the team wont make any stupid decisions. On the low skilled teams they would face similar opponents so their experience would be of less ROFL stomp games and more close battles where their mistakes and bad decision making is not punished so hard.

Pansenmann #10 Posted 06 January 2018 - 02:06 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 34043 battles
  • 12,599
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    08-17-2012

OP hides behind a sock puppet?

 

 

/vote for close, useless topic.



qpranger #11 Posted 06 January 2018 - 02:09 AM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 32397 battles
  • 5,061
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    12-25-2013

View PostTemid23, on 06 January 2018 - 03:01 AM, said:

@OP

Just for the record:

In witch blessed and superior to all others countries, your amazing "gift to the world" person managed to be born (by pure RNG chance btw.)?

:girl:

 

Oceania.

Secret2ndAccount #12 Posted 06 January 2018 - 02:10 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 2020 battles
  • 26
  • Member since:
    08-17-2016

View PostTemid23, on 06 January 2018 - 02:01 AM, said:

@OP

Just for the record:

In witch blessed and superior to all others countries, your amazing "gift to the world" person managed to be born (by pure RNG chance btw.)?

:girl:

 

I assume that you refer "PL" tag. That was partly a joke, but...

Spoiler


View PostHeidenSieker, on 06 January 2018 - 01:23 AM, said:

 

To you and the OP: so you'd support a skill-based matchmaker, then? If not, why not?

 

I don't want skill based MM, but WG could clean these obvious bot/troll accounts*.

 

*Very secret forum posting accounts not included




Edited by Jbnn, 06 January 2018 - 10:40 AM.


NajcrnjeNoci #13 Posted 06 January 2018 - 02:32 AM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 9749 battles
  • 73
  • Member since:
    10-18-2014
WG just wants your money, they don't care about giving any kind of good service. Bunch of crooks.

soul3ater #14 Posted 06 January 2018 - 02:36 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 18764 battles
  • 635
  • Member since:
    07-27-2012

And this is why I don't use XVM.

 

xvm only adds fuel. I would rather not know that I have absolute helmets in my team. thx



Desyatnik_Pansy #15 Posted 06 January 2018 - 02:41 AM

    Bartender

  • Player
  • 16385 battles
  • 25,842
  • [-GLO-] -GLO-
  • Member since:
    04-19-2013

View Postsoul3ater, on 06 January 2018 - 01:36 AM, said:

And this is why I don't use XVM.

 

xvm only adds fuel. I would rather not know that I have absolute helmets in my team. thx

 

While I don't like XVM In the slightest, this thread could've been pretty much the exact same without XVM. It doesn't take much to right click someone's name and check their stats after they die first in their top tier tank doing 0 Damage. :P

_T_1_T_4_N_0_ #16 Posted 06 January 2018 - 02:43 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 31022 battles
  • 1,114
  • [SQCI] SQCI
  • Member since:
    02-17-2015

View PostSovietBias, on 06 January 2018 - 12:59 AM, said:

WG does not care. It helps fill the servers and our salt levels.

 

Its worrying if you are a WoT fan this is the usual pattern where playerbase skill slips down and it usually gets to a point then numbers avalanche.
 

soul3ater #17 Posted 06 January 2018 - 03:56 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 18764 battles
  • 635
  • Member since:
    07-27-2012

View PostDesyatnik_Pansy, on 06 January 2018 - 01:41 AM, said:

 

While I don't like XVM In the slightest, this thread could've been pretty much the exact same without XVM. It doesn't take much to right click someone's name and check their stats after they die first in their top tier tank doing 0 Damage. :P

 

Ignorance is a bliss they say. just clicking on their profile is enough for me, no need to go to individual tanks lol.

enu_ #18 Posted 06 January 2018 - 04:00 AM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Beta Tester
  • 22576 battles
  • 3,049
  • [-322-] -322-
  • Member since:
    08-18-2010

View PostHeidenSieker, on 06 January 2018 - 01:20 AM, said:

 

Why do you imagine that they should be banned, please?

 

because of boting 

spamhamstar #19 Posted 06 January 2018 - 04:17 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 64310 battles
  • 1,515
  • [LLAY] LLAY
  • Member since:
    12-02-2012

View PostSecret2ndAccount, on 05 January 2018 - 11:55 PM, said:

A few example of finest team mates seen battles today. How these "players" are not permanently banned yet? 

 

Spoiler

 

Spoiler

 

Spoiler

 

Spoiler

 

Spoiler

 

Spoiler

 

 

So do you also think your own account should be banned due to your 25% win rate at tier 6 or perhaps the accounts you've quoted should be given the chance to pad their stats at tier 2 before passing judgement?

 

I appreciate you're not posting from your main account, but that only raises more questions about your character.



malachi6 #20 Posted 06 January 2018 - 07:37 AM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 49855 battles
  • 3,444
  • Member since:
    04-14-2011

I love the conflation of ability and PL.  It one of the most oft used pieces of ignorance in the game.  Many PL people play.  For some reason PL players like to append PL to their name.  Therefor what appears to be a disproportionate number of PL players appear as bad.  Classic observational bias and xenophobia combined.

 

It would be laughable if it were not so sad.







Also tagged with bot, afk, no ban

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users