Jump to content


Update 9.22 Super Test Patch Notes


  • Please log in to reply
114 replies to this topic

_k0z0_1337 #61 Posted 16 January 2018 - 05:21 PM

    Sergeant

  • Beta Tester
  • 45449 battles
  • 248
  • [FUSED] FUSED
  • Member since:
    10-12-2010

Do we need new tanks in this game? Maybe like 1 line / year.

Do they need to spam new tanks like crazy? Yes they do, they have to work on somethig and to make ppl spend money so they can live... it is pure marketing and basic needs :trollface:

 

So these posts here where we are chatting like little sparrows in a bush they are marketing too, try to understand and try to see the bigger picture and stop being ofended by their actions and their silly projects because they are not ment for you!!!  they are ment for them so they can get paid and stuff... and try, for once to understand that they do not give a f***k about us they just pretend to do so, BE SMART GUYS ;)

So, in conclusion just be happy about things u like at this game and forget the rest and if there is more to not like than to like just stop playing this game and play somethig else there are tons of games out there :playing:

 

Happy hunting !!!



GB3000 #62 Posted 16 January 2018 - 07:35 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 17783 battles
  • 55
  • Member since:
    05-13-2015

View PostDava_117, on 16 January 2018 - 04:52 PM, said:

 

Again, it's not completely like this.

With every ammo type you still need to lead, because there are no laser gun in game, so travel time allways needs to be taken into account. But a faster shell can allows you to hit more reliably. Remember also that premium ammo isn't necessary the fastest one. For example most of tier 10 meds have APCR as standard ammo, so theydon't need to swap to HEAT (that is slower) to reliably hit fast tank. Most of the time it's a tradeoff.

Weackspot knowledge is also not outdated. You have to know armour layout to incline your armour or to reliably pen enemy one. You can spam HEAT on maus sides as much as you want, but just a few of them will pen, because of the thick spaced arour that cover 2/3 of the hull sides.

Idem for flanking. Some of the new or incoming armours are completely retarded and can bounce even premium, sometimes without angling, so you have to flanck. Also competent heavytank player will allways expose their armour in a way to stop incoming gold.

Also take into account that you may get hit by gold not directed to you. When you're top tier nd get matched against a Type5, you can't allow him to be uncontrasted so you load your premium (because, you know, no real weackspot on it). But then a fast paper tank pass in front of you: you can't wast the time to reload your gun, so you shot him with your premium. You have to thank this retarded no weackspot super heavy meta for this, and I say it as an heavy tank player (that in some battle bounce more gold than standard shell)!

Spoiler

 

With every ammo type you still need to lead, because there are no laser gun in game.

-> But most gold shells going faster. and nobody was talking about lasergun.

 

Weackspot knowledge is also not outdated. You have to know armour layout to incline your armour or to reliably pen enemy one. You can spam HEAT on maus sides as much as you want, but just a few of them will pen, because of the thick spaced arour that cover 2/3 of the hull sides.

-> gold = lower plate or turret ~ works for most tanks. (dont list the hand full on tanks where it dont work pls)

-> Maus is totally slow and only LIVES on his armor. ~ like the most heavys.

 

 Some of the new or incoming armours are completely retarded and can bounce even premium, sometimes without angling, so you have to flanck.

-> only bad news if you talking about an LIGHT, MED or ARTY ~ else GOOD news because well armored HEAVYS and TDS normally made for this.

 

 When you're top tier nd get matched against a Type5, you can't allow him to be uncontrasted so you load your premium (because, you know, no real weackspot on it)

-> dont start with type 5 heavy ... we all know this tank is unbalanced.

 

 


Edited by GB3000, 16 January 2018 - 07:36 PM.


Dava_117 #63 Posted 16 January 2018 - 10:24 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 20903 battles
  • 4,053
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    12-17-2014

View PostGB3000, on 16 January 2018 - 07:35 PM, said:

With every ammo type you still need to lead, because there are no laser gun in game.

-> But most gold shells going faster. and nobody was talking about lasergun.

Laser was an hyperbole. Of course we don't have laser gun...

 

Weackspot knowledge is also not outdated. You have to know armour layout to incline your armour or to reliably pen enemy one. You can spam HEAT on maus sides as much as you want, but just a few of them will pen, because of the thick spaced arour that cover 2/3 of the hull sides.

-> gold = lower plate or turret ~ works for most tanks. (dont list the hand full on tanks where it dont work pls)

-> Maus is totally slow and only LIVES on his armor. ~ like the most heavys.

Maus live on his armour, but some of it has been overbuffed, like turret front or sides behind the track. How it is now, you can't track and damage it, so even flanking is a bad option.

 

 Some of the new or incoming armours are completely retarded and can bounce even premium, sometimes without angling, so you have to flanck.

-> only bad news if you talking about an LIGHT, MED or ARTY ~ else GOOD news because well armored HEAVYS and TDS normally made for this.

I agree that HT should have good armour, but this is simply dumb. If it continue to go on, HTs won't be able to pen eachother. And TDs to stop them. Plus, you complain about gold ammo making usless armour layout knowledge, while the only thing you should know about theit new HTs is point your nose to the enemy?

 

 When you're top tier nd get matched against a Type5, you can't allow him to be uncontrasted so you load your premium (because, you know, no real weackspot on it)

-> dont start with type 5 heavy ... we all know this tank is unbalanced.

It was just an example to introduce while a tank may shot to a paper one with slow gold shell...

 

 

 



ghostbuster_no2 #64 Posted 17 January 2018 - 11:01 AM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 44770 battles
  • 3,322
  • [-OMG-] -OMG-
  • Member since:
    05-04-2011

I thought a lot about the changes to the russian techtree:

  1. Introducing a rear-turreted HT-line with Bobject-252-like armor? Sure, why not. Powercreep is something we got used to. Maybe mobility and/or gunstats will suck hard enough to make these tanks moderately well balanced. To be honest I will play at least the Tier 8, simply because I do like rear turrets.
  2. More consistency within the medium lines are actually a rather good idea, and even though the new Obj. 430 II descendant is not know yet, a new rear turreted medium at Tier 10 sounds good. The changes are annoying for those, who wanted to reach the 430 through this line, though. On the other hand, WG has the stats and should know, when a tank underperformes.
  3. The TD line is supposed to be more consistent, too. Sadly, WG focusses on the wrong features of said consistency. Now all tanks in that line have a rear superstructure, wow. Also, all tanks lose their agility, their rather good gunstats in favour of bloom as big as Japans cherry blossoming and mobility like an AMX40. Sure, that is consistent, every tank in that line seems to suck hard now. But I my humble opinion that is the wrong consistency. Sure, the Su-122-54 seems misplaced in that line, and the smaller TDs underperforme slighty. Yet that is nothing that calls for the proposed drastic changes to the whole line, especially not demoting a great Tier 10 TD with unique gameplay and replacing it with yet another 750-alpha-copy without any remarkable traits. Buff the small ones, maybe exchange the Su-122-54, if you absolutely must, but keep the mobility and quick-firing guns as a consistency of the line, don't frickle some shiet together.


GB3000 #65 Posted 18 January 2018 - 10:54 AM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 17783 battles
  • 55
  • Member since:
    05-13-2015

I still dont know any reason why goldshells improve this game. Not 1.

 

Nobody says you HAVE to deal as lowtier with a well armored heavy frontally.

You are not glued to 1 spot @ the map and cant flank a tank.

Most well armored tanks got other weakpoints ~speed, reload etc.

 


Edited by GB3000, 18 January 2018 - 11:05 AM.


anonym_5rRVJmspoCv0 #66 Posted 18 January 2018 - 11:30 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 0 battles
  • 5
  • Member since:
    12-02-2018
why the test server not working

Hammerhead20 #67 Posted 18 January 2018 - 02:29 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 27057 battles
  • 1,995
  • Member since:
    06-29-2011

View PostIceman_ZG, on 18 January 2018 - 01:30 PM, said:

why the test server not working

 

Because, it's not ready yet?

cigans11 #68 Posted 18 January 2018 - 02:35 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 5014 battles
  • 17
  • [-LYNX] -LYNX
  • Member since:
    02-28-2013
What time is it coming out???

Eure_Armut_k0tzt_mich_an #69 Posted 18 January 2018 - 06:09 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 24054 battles
  • 25
  • [-WHAT] -WHAT
  • Member since:
    03-25-2013
where is the test server?

593r #70 Posted 18 January 2018 - 07:37 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 45069 battles
  • 472
  • Member since:
    07-31-2014

Morgen (19.01.) 13:00 Uhr

 

https://ritastatusre...22-test-update/



rocrystyano #71 Posted 18 January 2018 - 08:15 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 13507 battles
  • 3
  • Member since:
    10-04-2011

​            WoT Common Test postponed                                                  The first Common Test will come tomorrow, January 19th, at about 16:00 Moscow time.


Edited by rocrystyano, 18 January 2018 - 08:27 PM.


HaLlak65 #72 Posted 18 January 2018 - 10:42 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 39828 battles
  • 77
  • [VIHAR] VIHAR
  • Member since:
    05-11-2011
quick question. The 2 "?" T10 tank are coming in this pacth or the next 1.0?

BRONZE_IV_division #73 Posted 19 January 2018 - 08:19 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 7018 battles
  • 1
  • Member since:
    09-15-2015

19.01.2018

still waiting for the Test Server to be online...



Hammerhead20 #74 Posted 19 January 2018 - 09:57 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 27057 battles
  • 1,995
  • Member since:
    06-29-2011

View PostHaLlak65, on 19 January 2018 - 12:42 AM, said:

quick question. The 2 "?" T10 tank are coming in this pacth or the next 1.0?

 

Perhaps you should ready the patch notes?

Kandly #75 Posted 19 January 2018 - 11:04 AM

    Player

  • Player
  • 833 battles
  • 804
  • Member since:
    08-23-2016

View PostBRONZE_IV_division, on 19 January 2018 - 07:19 AM, said:

19.01.2018

still waiting for the Test Server to be online...

 

Hey! It's not up yet, but it will be later today (at ~2 pm CET).

cigans11 #76 Posted 19 January 2018 - 12:32 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 5014 battles
  • 17
  • [-LYNX] -LYNX
  • Member since:
    02-28-2013

View PostKandly, on 19 January 2018 - 10:04 AM, said:

 

Hey! It's not up yet, but it will be later today (at ~2 pm CET).

 

14:30 CET still no update? D:

Geno1isme #77 Posted 19 January 2018 - 12:37 PM

    General

  • Player
  • 45293 battles
  • 9,242
  • [TRYIT] TRYIT
  • Member since:
    09-03-2013

View Postcigans11, on 19 January 2018 - 01:32 PM, said:

 

14:30 CET still no update? D:

 

Your clock is wrong, it's 12:30 now.

Kandly #78 Posted 19 January 2018 - 12:39 PM

    Player

  • Player
  • 833 battles
  • 804
  • Member since:
    08-23-2016

View Postcigans11, on 19 January 2018 - 11:32 AM, said:

 

14:30 CET still no update? D:

 

Patience, young padawan. :P We still have one hour and a half to go. :)

cigans11 #79 Posted 19 January 2018 - 02:02 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 5014 battles
  • 17
  • [-LYNX] -LYNX
  • Member since:
    02-28-2013

So, if im correct it should be open now, now for sure.

 



paolotk #80 Posted 19 January 2018 - 02:02 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 35383 battles
  • 635
  • [ORKI] ORKI
  • Member since:
    07-26-2012
14:02 CET where is the update? :D:D




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users