Jump to content


Remodel T110E5 flat armor

T110E5 Heavy tanks Tech tree Remodel Buff eggshell armor Update American Vehicles nerf

  • Please log in to reply
48 replies to this topic

Poll: T110E5 did not have eggshell (88 members have cast votes)

You have to complete 250 battles in order to participate this poll.

Do you want remodel flat armor?

  1. Yes we want remodel flat armor (51 votes [54.84%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 54.84%

  2. No we want egshell armor (30 votes [32.26%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 32.26%

  3. That does not matter (12 votes [12.90%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 12.90%

Vote Hide poll

pouriya77 #1 Posted 14 January 2018 - 04:27 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 3066 battles
  • 38
  • Member since:
    08-26-2017

The T110E5 did not have an "eggshell" style frontal plate, it had a flat one.The reason I insist on this is that the flat armor improves the condition of the tank. because in Historically, the tank has had a flat armor. and flat armor have small lower plate to peni request from designers to remodel it from history concepts. Thanks alot for all those who participated in the poll

 

 

 

 

 

 


Edited by pouriya77, 03 February 2018 - 07:38 AM.


xx984 #2 Posted 14 January 2018 - 04:44 AM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 50839 battles
  • 2,066
  • [GO-IN] GO-IN
  • Member since:
    08-11-2013

Lets ask the magic conch once again

 

The Conch has spoken!


Edited by xx984, 14 January 2018 - 04:45 AM.


unrealname #3 Posted 14 January 2018 - 10:36 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 20275 battles
  • 889
  • Member since:
    10-31-2013
no better remove cupola from turret, so it can be the same as IS7 and obj 705A when hulldown :)

jabster #4 Posted 14 January 2018 - 11:15 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 12516 battles
  • 21,676
  • [WSAT] WSAT
  • Member since:
    12-30-2010
The lack of replies to your multiple posts about this may suggest you need to add a who cares option to your poll.

_LUL_ #5 Posted 14 January 2018 - 12:58 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 7509 battles
  • 155
  • Member since:
    10-06-2016

View PostBond90, on 14 January 2018 - 10:36 AM, said:

no better remove cupola from turret, so it can be the same as IS7 and obj 705A when hulldown :)

 

this

pouriya77 #6 Posted 15 January 2018 - 04:52 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 3066 battles
  • 38
  • Member since:
    08-26-2017

Hi. The reason I insist on this is that the flat armor improves the condition of the tank. because in Historically, the tank has had a flat armor. and flat armor have small lower plate to pen. i give this message to designers please remodel it from history concepts. please take part in poll.

 


Edited by pouriya77, 15 January 2018 - 09:16 AM.


Cobra6 #7 Posted 15 January 2018 - 08:34 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 16295 battles
  • 15,008
  • [RGT] RGT
  • Member since:
    09-17-2010

View Postpouriya77, on 15 January 2018 - 03:52 AM, said:

If you want to buff the T110E5 the best way is flat armor.

 

But we don't want to, it was broken before and balanced now. Buffing the armour again would yet again break it which is worse for the game in general.

 

Cobra 6



pouriya77 #8 Posted 15 January 2018 - 09:07 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 3066 battles
  • 38
  • Member since:
    08-26-2017

View PostCobra6, on 15 January 2018 - 08:34 AM, said:

 

But we don't want to, it was broken before and balanced now. Buffing the armour again would yet again break it which is worse for the game in general.

 

Cobra 6

 

my friend in fact flat armor is not buffing.in fact and real concepts it had flat armor then this tank must remodeled to real form

Cobra6 #9 Posted 15 January 2018 - 09:33 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 16295 battles
  • 15,008
  • [RGT] RGT
  • Member since:
    09-17-2010

View Postpouriya77, on 15 January 2018 - 08:07 AM, said:

 

my friend in fact flat armor is not buffing.in fact and real concepts it had flat armor then this tank must remodeled to real form

 

It is because it makes the whole armour homogeneous.

 

Cobra 6



DaMP13R #10 Posted 15 January 2018 - 09:39 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 36591 battles
  • 386
  • Member since:
    07-08-2011

Well with the way things are going, I say we must buff the E5.. buff every heavy.. buff every tank.. EVERYTHING.. to hell with it, 1000mm of armor all over every single tank in the game, then you can all shoot HE for 0 damage and stop spamming HEAT/AP. HE is the new meta anyways. :hiding:

 

Anyone who experienced the E5 when it was broken does not want to experience it again, on the bright side we have Type 5 now.. so we don't need E5 to be OP. 



pouriya77 #11 Posted 15 January 2018 - 10:09 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 3066 battles
  • 38
  • Member since:
    08-26-2017

View PostDaMP13R, on 15 January 2018 - 09:39 AM, said:

Well with the way things are going, I say we must buff the E5.. buff every heavy.. buff every tank.. EVERYTHING.. to hell with it, 1000mm of armor all over every single tank in the game, then you can all shoot HE for 0 damage and stop spamming HEAT/AP. HE is the new meta anyways. :hiding:

 

Anyone who experienced the E5 when it was broken does not want to experience it again, on the bright side we have Type 5 now.. so we don't need E5 to be OP. 

My friend every tank must design from its real form from history i dont know why devolpers maked E5 eggshell.i requesd them to remodel it from real concepts.not buff it.



Aikl #12 Posted 15 January 2018 - 10:40 AM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 25141 battles
  • 4,001
  • [-MM] -MM
  • Member since:
    04-13-2011

View Postpouriya77, on 15 January 2018 - 09:09 AM, said:

My friend every tank must design from its real form from history i dont know why devolpers maked E5 eggshell.i requesd them to remodel it from real concepts.not buff it.

 

Nah. Japanese superheavies are borked beyond any napkin ideas the Japs might've had, Chinese TDs are more than likely a fantasy product catering to the Chinese server cluster - and made virtually identical to the Soviets to skip any real need for balancing. There are also plenty of individual tanks that were likely made up as a stopgap and then proved impossible to replace. Plenty of times Wargaming takes the role of tank designers more than researchers - e.g. taking a chassis and applying general design ideas to create what they need.

 

It's not really that problematic. I'd prefer to have the tanks marked as such, but as long as they look like real-world designs I couldn't care less. As for the E5, while it looks better with flat armor, it also looks a lot more like the pre-buff Conqueror. The last thing I'd want are tanks that look and play too similar to each other. Not a fan of every tank having strong turret armor and -10 gun depression, for instance. It's boring.



HugSeal #13 Posted 15 January 2018 - 10:47 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 22717 battles
  • 1,949
  • [SWEC] SWEC
  • Member since:
    05-10-2012

View Postpouriya77, on 15 January 2018 - 09:07 AM, said:

my friend in fact flat armor is not buffing.in fact and real concepts it had flat armor then this tank must remodeled to real form

 

No idea who you are so I'm not gonna call you friend.

 

So, making the armour flat isn't buffing the tank? Then why do you claim that it would buff the tank ust three hours earlier?

 

"the flat armor improves the condition of the tank"

 

And why "must" it be remodeleds to real form? Ther is literally NOTHING forcing them to remodel it to "real form" You also don't explain why every tank must design from its real form.

 

All it is is you wanting a tank that has already been broken once buffed due to "history". I'd say nah.

 



K_A #14 Posted 15 January 2018 - 10:50 AM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 13566 battles
  • 4,656
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    04-18-2013
Once again, I voted both because I can:hiding:

discontinued #15 Posted 15 January 2018 - 10:56 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 5434 battles
  • 638
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    08-22-2017

I voted no because I like shooting them so much.Go eggshell go :)

 

The conch is right!

 

No donrt buff everything just buff my STB-1. My one only I want 3k dmg per shot c'mon WG you know I deserve it :ohmy:

 

Nerf everyone else but me, also make it compulsory for every other tier 10 too have to use the nasty Xmas cammo...or they cant play..But buff my tanks

 

Because I'm worth it.


Edited by discontinued, 15 January 2018 - 11:03 AM.


Soifon99 #16 Posted 15 January 2018 - 11:08 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 34743 battles
  • 388
  • [KITTY] KITTY
  • Member since:
    01-21-2013

It would improve the way the tank works, you can angle the front so you can improve the armor..  i think it can be done in a balanced way.. 

 

But for me it's also fine if they would make the machine gun cupola smaller :)  



pouriya77 #17 Posted 15 January 2018 - 11:17 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 3066 battles
  • 38
  • Member since:
    08-26-2017

View PostHugSeal, on 15 January 2018 - 10:47 AM, said:

 

No idea who you are so I'm not gonna call you friend.

 

So, making the armour flat isn't buffing the tank? Then why do you claim that it would buff the tank ust three hours earlier?

 

"the flat armor improves the condition of the tank"

 

And why "must" it be remodeleds to real form? Ther is literally NOTHING forcing them to remodel it to "real form" You also don't explain why every tank must design from its real form.

 

All it is is you wanting a tank that has already been broken once buffed due to "history". I'd say nah.

 

My friend i am not your enemy every one have diffrent ideas this is your idea and i respect to it.like i said flat armor is not buffing at all. But it will be like e110 or e75 they can do very jobs with their armor this is i say condition. There is no must at all.this is their game and they can do every thing with game but we respect them and they recpect our feedback too.

 


Edited by pouriya77, 15 January 2018 - 11:19 AM.


pouriya77 #18 Posted 15 January 2018 - 11:22 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 3066 battles
  • 38
  • Member since:
    08-26-2017

View Postdiscontinued, on 15 January 2018 - 10:56 AM, said:

I voted no because I like shooting them so much.Go eggshell go :)

 

The conch is right!

 

No donrt buff everything just buff my STB-1. My one only I want 3k dmg per shot c'mon WG you know I deserve it :ohmy:

 

Nerf everyone else but me, also make it compulsory for every other tier 10 too have to use the nasty Xmas cammo...or they cant play..But buff my tanks

 

Because I'm worth it.

If you had t110E5 in your garage you said yes.every one say no hate t110E5 and hitted from it.


Edited by pouriya77, 15 January 2018 - 11:42 AM.


Archaean #19 Posted 15 January 2018 - 11:22 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 14948 battles
  • 1,166
  • [S4LT] S4LT
  • Member since:
    04-25-2015

currently e5 is really one of the few really balanced tanks compared to everything there is atm. Too bad that it doesn't fit the current meta.

 

I think they should buff is-7's lower front plate to make it competitive against maus and type 5 heavy. It's RITIKULUS that you can pen the lower front plate with normal rounds...



trispect #20 Posted 15 January 2018 - 11:24 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Beta Tester
  • 32965 battles
  • 1,741
  • [HSOP] HSOP
  • Member since:
    01-16-2011
The hull is really not the weak part of this tank. It's the tumor on top of the turret that makes this tank useless. Just reduce the size of the miniturret and buff max speed both forwards and backwards and the tank is usable once again.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users