Jump to content


All your opinions about the "heavy tank" Obj.260

obj260

  • Please log in to reply
8 replies to this topic

ValkyrionX #1 Posted 14 January 2018 - 07:43 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 40540 battles
  • 878
  • [VIVUS] VIVUS
  • Member since:
    02-07-2015

 

hi to all,

I come here as owner of the obj260 to know how you play this tank, you will have noticed that I put the words "heavy tank" between the quotes because, in my opinion, is a mix between medium and heavy. 

I would like to know what you think of this tank, for those who own it like me that plays so much, and also the opinions of those who have it and find it a bad tank.

In my opinion the obj260 is excellent both in the role of heavy and sometimes even (when needed) like medium tank, given the great agility and power of the engine that makes it perhaps the most agile among the heavy tier 10 together with the chineses wz-5a and 113 . Huge defect (or rather two) for a tank that aspires to be multi-role (but still remains a heavy tank) the terrible weakspot in turret, as is3 and is4, which sometimes combined with the terrible gun depression (only -5 degrees) makes the tank insidious to play against some types of opponents and tanks (who know the weakspot) or "higher" tanks

For the rest the resistance of the modules (ammorack / fueltank / engine/ crew members / gun and others) of the tank is excellent, only personal note are these horrible flaws that often make the tank difficult to play in certain situations and in combination with the poor gun depression (unlike the 113 that saw the gun depression increased to -7 degrees) more difficult and challenging to play in land not flat ( even very little!!),and this in my opinion is lost (along with the wakspot of the turret) makes it more difficult to play. Would it be so stupid to ask that the gun depression at -7 be increased to 260?

 Maybe even a few more shots, only 30 shots in my opinion are very few .. I have risked to be without shooting many times ...

For the rest is a wagon very fun to play due to its good general characteristics with which I can make excellent matches.
Only note, I do not understand why multi-role carts, such as the 260 or 113, have so much difference in dpm .. if you try in the comparison section of the wagons you will find that by mounting the improved equipment on 260 and the rations you will reach the dpm of 113 that mounts normal equipment .. then try to put them on 113 and you will see the absurd dpm that reaches
now tell me yours !!

 

I apologize in advance for the bad English

 


Edited by ValkyrionX, 14 January 2018 - 07:44 PM.


Dex022 #2 Posted 15 January 2018 - 02:31 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 38389 battles
  • 1,622
  • [ASOS-] ASOS-
  • Member since:
    12-26-2011
It could use various small buffs. Depression maybe to -6,maybe 100-200hp more and maybe +10 shells. Any of these would be welcome. For me,slightly better gun depression would be fine.

mvdt #3 Posted 15 January 2018 - 02:48 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 37303 battles
  • 278
  • [-GODS] -GODS
  • Member since:
    05-10-2011

I agree, it is indeed a medium heavy.

The only thing that lets me down in this tank is the turret roof... 

A degree more gundepression would be nice aswell.

 

View PosteXterm, on 15 January 2018 - 02:43 PM, said:

if you try to go with meds whole team chat will explode with "Object 260 noob, where you gone?!"

This is soo true xD

 



Dex022 #4 Posted 15 January 2018 - 03:32 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 38389 battles
  • 1,622
  • [ASOS-] ASOS-
  • Member since:
    12-26-2011
With buff to gun depression roof would be less exposed also when using it full,even if only a bit.

Dr_ownape #5 Posted 15 January 2018 - 03:39 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 40613 battles
  • 5,143
  • [IDEAL] IDEAL
  • Member since:
    03-27-2013

too long reload

worthless armour

no depression

 

IS-7 better in most ways - why play it?



deivio82 #6 Posted 15 January 2018 - 03:40 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 45379 battles
  • 127
  • [LT-UK] LT-UK
  • Member since:
    05-20-2012

Obj-260  has a stupid gun ... never know if u will hit... 50/50 chance  ..  

 

SCALE 1 to 10    i give 

 

big 7.



Dex022 #7 Posted 15 January 2018 - 03:55 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 38389 battles
  • 1,622
  • [ASOS-] ASOS-
  • Member since:
    12-26-2011

I must say after all the hustle with stupid rng missions tank is slightly underwhelming but again considering time when mission were released it's suffered like many tanks from power creep. 

But still no at list small buff.



Dr_ownape #8 Posted 15 January 2018 - 04:07 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 40613 battles
  • 5,143
  • [IDEAL] IDEAL
  • Member since:
    03-27-2013

View PostDex022, on 15 January 2018 - 02:55 PM, said:

I must say after all the hustle with stupid rng missions tank is slightly underwhelming but again considering time when mission were released it's suffered like many tanks from power creep. 

But still no at list small buff.

 

Yeah i actually got it about 4 months after it came out and had some fun while it was new and a lot of super heavies didn't exist. But even then the lack of depression and poor hull armour scuppered your plans to use the speed and play agressive.

Sfinski #9 Posted 15 January 2018 - 04:10 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 29741 battles
  • 2,003
  • [-PJ-] -PJ-
  • Member since:
    09-26-2013
It's +2 tiered defender with better gun.





Also tagged with obj260

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users