Jump to content


what tanks do you think are in the wrong tiers ?


  • Please log in to reply
43 replies to this topic

stevearno #1 Posted 16 January 2018 - 03:28 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 19784 battles
  • 696
  • Member since:
    05-29-2014
Black prince - should be in tier one

HM_Kaiser #2 Posted 16 January 2018 - 03:43 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 24978 battles
  • 130
  • Member since:
    08-11-2014
Tiger I, should be at tier 6 like the premium ones.

Havoc7926 #3 Posted 16 January 2018 - 03:58 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Beta Tester
  • 13083 battles
  • 559
  • [OLDG] OLDG
  • Member since:
    01-21-2011
Tiger 1 definitely a tier too high.  Possibly the Tiger II as well 

SuedKAT #4 Posted 16 January 2018 - 04:02 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 12154 battles
  • 6,152
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    08-21-2014
Obj 252U / Defender, it's already balanced like a tier 9.

Xqual #5 Posted 16 January 2018 - 04:09 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 58414 battles
  • 63
  • Member since:
    03-05-2013

View PostHavoc7926, on 16 January 2018 - 03:58 PM, said:

Tiger 1 definitely a tier too high.  Possibly the Tiger II as well 

 

Why? It is a great tank. amazing gun.
Tiger2 is also a good tank. you just need to unlearn what you have learen and play it like the tiger1.

arthurwellsley #6 Posted 16 January 2018 - 04:36 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 50512 battles
  • 2,521
  • [-B-C-] -B-C-
  • Member since:
    05-11-2011

Black Prince = buffed and so much better than it used to be.

Tiger I = better than the Japanese Heavy mk I the tier below, and so would need to be nerfed to that level to drop a tier to VI or it would be OP in tier VI.

Tiger II = dropping from tier VIII to tier VII would need a major nerf or it would be the best tier VII in the game.

 

Panther. Presently a lacklustre tier VII, whereas the vk 30.02(m) is an excellent tier VI and really what the Panther should be.

 

T29 too good for tier VII? T32 not quite good enough for tier VIII? discuss.

 

AMX 65 t not good enough for tier VIII?

 

Defender/Object 252U too powerful for tier IX (did you notice what I did there?) ?

 

Not enough view range for tier X = AMX 13 105, T-100 LT, WZ132-1, Rheinmettal Panzerwagen?

 

Too powerful for tier XI(eleven) object 907?

 

[beware this post may contain sarcasm, hyperbole, wit, over exaggeration and nuts]


Edited by arthurwellsley, 16 January 2018 - 04:37 PM.


cragarion #7 Posted 16 January 2018 - 04:38 PM

    Captain

  • Beta Tester
  • 41791 battles
  • 2,164
  • Member since:
    07-10-2010
Type 5 should be in tier 5 to match it's name :izmena: :D

Xqual #8 Posted 16 January 2018 - 04:41 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 58414 battles
  • 63
  • Member since:
    03-05-2013

View Postcragarion, on 16 January 2018 - 04:38 PM, said:

Type 5 should be in tier 5 to match it's name :izmena: :D

 

And the skilled players would still use p2w ammo ;)



Homer_J #9 Posted 16 January 2018 - 04:46 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 27094 battles
  • 27,749
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    09-03-2010

View PostHavoc7926, on 16 January 2018 - 02:58 PM, said:

Tiger 1 definitely a tier too high.  Possibly the Tiger II as well 

 

They have premium versions a tier lower, two Tigers and the VK4503.  Take a long look at those and tell us you still think the same.

stevearno #10 Posted 16 January 2018 - 04:47 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 19784 battles
  • 696
  • Member since:
    05-29-2014

I have not played WOT in a long time , i was playing warships for a bit

 

All these NOOB premium tanks make some of the old tanks meaningless in my opinion - i have only just started playing with the black prince but just feel its rubbish compared to what is out there  in the same class now  ( i actually liked the Churchill ) . The gun needs to be increased to 350mm penetration and then for it to be put in tier one 

 

And since i started playing again , i noticed that arts no longer have gold ( one shot ) shells .... i don't want to play with them unless i can one shot people .. ( but from a tank perspective - its balanced now ).  It was ridiculous, i just used to load gold ammo for 700dmg @ tier 5 



tomosten #11 Posted 16 January 2018 - 04:49 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 26707 battles
  • 568
  • Member since:
    04-30-2015
T69, should be better in tier 7.

hajoittaja #12 Posted 16 January 2018 - 04:50 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 36652 battles
  • 496
  • [ELC-P] ELC-P
  • Member since:
    02-27-2013
T71 should be tier higher

ThebaldEagle #13 Posted 16 January 2018 - 05:01 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 750 battles
  • 369
  • Member since:
    02-13-2014
Every tank that kills me

Lycopersicon #14 Posted 16 January 2018 - 05:07 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 10537 battles
  • 3,494
  • Member since:
    07-30-2014
Obviously all those light tanks that were nominally left into their tier without a change while their matchmaking was shifted one tier downwards last summer.

Edited by Lycopersicon, 16 January 2018 - 09:01 PM.


commer #15 Posted 16 January 2018 - 05:09 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 38080 battles
  • 1,995
  • Member since:
    06-14-2011

View PostHM_Kaiser, on 16 January 2018 - 03:43 PM, said:

Tiger I, should be at tier 6 like the premium ones.

 

View PostHavoc7926, on 16 January 2018 - 03:58 PM, said:

Tiger 1 definitely a tier too high.  Possibly the Tiger II as well 

 

LOL yeah highest DPM at tier7 + that HP + 200 pen sounds like a great material for a t6 heavy. Are you insane?

BicycleOfDeath #16 Posted 16 January 2018 - 05:09 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 14540 battles
  • 349
  • [T-OG] T-OG
  • Member since:
    12-06-2013
The T-34-2 can probably be dropped a tier as it is. Not that I've played it, but I love having opinions about things without any actual related experience.

Sirebellus #17 Posted 16 January 2018 - 05:10 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 17486 battles
  • 391
  • Member since:
    02-04-2016
105 leFH 18B2 should have stun effect and be moved up to T6... I'd love to use it to really perma-stun and perma-track those T8 powercreep prems - it might not have the Alpha damage of a T6 SPG, but it does have more pen and fires 2.5 - 3 times quicker
The 90 second recharge time on consumables doesn't do much against the 7.36 second reload time of a fully pimped leFH :trollface:

Panokko #18 Posted 16 January 2018 - 05:17 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 25826 battles
  • 61
  • [HOFF] HOFF
  • Member since:
    09-28-2011

View PostSirebellus, on 16 January 2018 - 04:10 PM, said:

105 leFH 18B2 should have stun effect and be moved up to T6... I'd love to use it to really perma-stun and perma-track those T8 powercreep prems - it might not have the Alpha damage of a T6 SPG, but it does have more pen and fires 2.5 - 3 times quicker
The 90 second recharge time on consumables doesn't do much against the 7.36 second reload time of a fully pimped leFH :trollface:

 

You do realise that the leFH started out in tier 4.....

VsUK #19 Posted 16 January 2018 - 05:17 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 14288 battles
  • 1,301
  • Member since:
    06-19-2012
KV-1, KV-3 both a tier too high with the derp gun they have. SU-152 & ISU-152 both a tier too high. I've been shot at by a E-100 in my Action x & compared it with being shot at by a ISU-152 is just stupid amounts of damage. The SU-152 gun is just too powerful. Also, going back to the KV tanks. I've had shots bounce, fail to pen sat in my Grill on a KV-4. Just wrong in every aspect of it. 

Anyways, makes no difference what people thing. WG are pressing with the wallet warrior regime no matter what we think.

ricoBenitez1 #20 Posted 16 January 2018 - 05:22 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 506 battles
  • 569
  • Member since:
    10-29-2013

Every t

ank that VsUK drives cuz that tank have lazer mod

 


Edited by ricoBenitez1, 16 January 2018 - 05:24 PM.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users