Jump to content


Public Test 9.22 - OPEN


  • Please log in to reply
10 replies to this topic

fighting_falcon93 #1 Posted 19 January 2018 - 02:27 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 29335 battles
  • 3,334
  • Member since:
    02-05-2013

 

And guys please don't forget to protect our beloved Obj.263. Don't give up, we saved BatChat and we can save Obj.263

:izmena: :izmena: :izmena:

 

 

If you agree that Obj.263 should remain at tier 10 with either its current stats or buffed stats, please repost the image above to show your support. Don't forget how WG wanted to destroy the BatChat branch, and now they want to do it again with the Obj.263 branch. We managed to stop them then, and if we protest loud enough, we might be able to stop them again.

 

#KeepObj263AtTier10 :izmena: :izmena: :izmena:



Balc0ra #2 Posted 19 January 2018 - 03:04 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 62839 battles
  • 14,439
  • [WALL] WALL
  • Member since:
    07-10-2012
The only thing I did not like, was that they took the T-10 crew, and retrained it for the new tier 9 HT. That I have zero interest in keeping.

PirateMistress #3 Posted 19 January 2018 - 03:17 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 1166 battles
  • 9
  • Member since:
    12-16-2014
they should rename it to Gold server - since testing is a joke there

Balc0ra #4 Posted 19 January 2018 - 03:27 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 62839 battles
  • 14,439
  • [WALL] WALL
  • Member since:
    07-10-2012

View PostPirateMistress, on 19 January 2018 - 03:17 PM, said:

they should rename it to Gold server - since testing is a joke there

 

So is this forum, yet people come here to post stuff all the time.

_EXODUZ_ #5 Posted 19 January 2018 - 03:31 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 34165 battles
  • 1,935
  • [RGT] RGT
  • Member since:
    11-05-2014
You just made this tread because of Obj. 263, right? :teethhappy:

JocMeister #6 Posted 19 January 2018 - 03:36 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 20599 battles
  • 1,613
  • [-MM] -MM
  • Member since:
    08-03-2015
Let the rest of us too lazy to try the testserver know how broken the new Soviet tanks are!

Aikl #7 Posted 19 January 2018 - 03:43 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 25141 battles
  • 4,042
  • [-MM] -MM
  • Member since:
    04-13-2011

View PostPirateMistress, on 19 January 2018 - 02:17 PM, said:

they should rename it to Gold server - since testing is a joke there

 

Mass testing like this is to test for bugs or very obvious issues, not balancing. That is handled by a non-randomly selected set of supertest volunteers. They are probably centered around the target group Wargaming feels is the most important for income. That may or may not be the group where testing would produce what most of us would overall be least annoyed about.

 

 

 



VsUK #8 Posted 19 January 2018 - 03:49 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 14288 battles
  • 1,301
  • Member since:
    06-19-2012
Public testing should be called Wallet warrior tweaks. They complain & WG act. Just like when they wouldn't stop complaining about the Auf E-100 auto loader. They had a TD they couldn't just gold spam or creep up on. It's no different to the auto loaders we have now, in fact, out of all the auto loaders. It fairs rather poorly. But, Wallet warriors didn't like it's accuracy or its power. So, WG removed it & replaced it with the Grill 15, which does more damage overall PS than the Auf E-100 did. But it remains because it's less accurate & easier to kill. 

The game's influenced by wallet warriors. What benefits them remains, what doesn't, don't.

tajj7 #9 Posted 19 January 2018 - 04:16 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 24373 battles
  • 13,836
  • [-MM] -MM
  • Member since:
    03-30-2014

View PostVsUK, on 19 January 2018 - 02:49 PM, said:

Public testing should be called Wallet warrior tweaks. They complain & WG act. Just like when they wouldn't stop complaining about the Auf E-100 auto loader. They had a TD they couldn't just gold spam or creep up on. It's no different to the auto loaders we have now, in fact, out of all the auto loaders. It fairs rather poorly. But, Wallet warriors didn't like it's accuracy or its power. So, WG removed it & replaced it with the Grill 15, which does more damage overall PS than the Auf E-100 did. But it remains because it's less accurate & easier to kill. 

The game's influenced by wallet warriors. What benefits them remains, what doesn't, don't.

 

utter nonsense.

 

The Waffle E100 was removed because it was broken and completely cancerous to gameplay, it could clip any tank in the game in 8s or less, it had best in game accuracy and a 1.44s aim time, with a turret and was decently mobile. 

 

People would hide all game doing nohing and then pop out and delete two tanks for 3k damage and think they had a good game. 

 

People don't complain about the Grille 15 because firstly is was nerfed so it's more balanced now and because it does 750 alpha per shot which is still big but much more balanced for tier 10. 



Exozen #10 Posted 19 January 2018 - 04:26 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 30946 battles
  • 1,068
  • Member since:
    08-16-2011
New tanks seems to be really good , def CW/SH pickworthy.

Sfinski #11 Posted 19 January 2018 - 04:39 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 29763 battles
  • 2,013
  • [-PJ-] -PJ-
  • Member since:
    09-26-2013
Found one positive from test server. People TK arties. 




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users