Jump to content


430u predictions


  • Please log in to reply
12 replies to this topic

Dammonar #1 Posted 27 January 2018 - 08:46 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 51924 battles
  • 560
  • [RDDT] RDDT
  • Member since:
    02-22-2011

I don't know about 705a or the new TD whatever its called but im sure it will hit the meta like a sledge..  

 

Can you speculate on how it will change the cw/advance tactics in maps that you can't have only superheavies?

Thanks.



brumbarr #2 Posted 27 January 2018 - 08:48 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 38626 battles
  • 6,326
  • Member since:
    07-30-2012

View PostDammonar, on 27 January 2018 - 08:46 PM, said:

I don't know about 705a or the new TD whatever its called but im sure it will hit the meta like a sledge..  

 

Can you speculate on how it will change the cw/advance tactics in maps that you can't have only superheavies?

Thanks.

 

It wont change the meta much, since there are already similar tanks like the 113 and 5A, the only change is maybe going to be switching out some of those or some 907s for 430Us.

hasnainrakha57 #3 Posted 28 January 2018 - 11:47 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 13844 battles
  • 584
  • [WFTTE] WFTTE
  • Member since:
    08-01-2013

View Postbrumbarr, on 27 January 2018 - 07:48 PM, said:

 

It wont change the meta much, since there are already similar tanks like the 113 and 5A, the only change is maybe going to be switching out some of those or some 907s for 430Us.

113 and wz hull can be pen with gold ammo and for 430u its not that ezy and 430u cupolas are god like whereas wz and 113 has weak.Rof on 430u u can take it to maximum to 3400+.Side armor for 430u is better then 113 dont know about wz.Aim time on 430u is almost 1.8+I played it on test server with 0.38 accuracy none of my shot misses fired 2 shot on the move on tier 10 light amx none of them missed.So you cannot compare these 3 tanks in my opinion.And also u can pen 113 turret with gold from front.            

 

 

RASHA RNG + OBJ430 U IS THE SOLUTION TO ALL OF YOUR PROBLEMS ;)


Edited by hasnainrakha57, 28 January 2018 - 12:02 PM.


brumbarr #4 Posted 28 January 2018 - 12:40 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 38626 battles
  • 6,326
  • Member since:
    07-30-2012

View Posthasnainrakha57, on 28 January 2018 - 11:47 AM, said:

113 and wz hull can be pen with gold ammo and for 430u its not that ezy and 430u cupolas are god like whereas wz and 113 has weak.Rof on 430u u can take it to maximum to 3400+.Side armor for 430u is better then 113 dont know about wz.Aim time on 430u is almost 1.8+I played it on test server with 0.38 accuracy none of my shot misses fired 2 shot on the move on tier 10 light amx none of them missed.So you cannot compare these 3 tanks in my opinion.And also u can pen 113 turret with gold from front.            

 

 

RASHA RNG + OBJ430 U IS THE SOLUTION TO ALL OF YOUR PROBLEMS ;)

 

430U hull is like 10mm better than the 113, it doenst matter much.  yeah, 430 cupolas are better but that doesnt matter for CW, aslong as the turret is  hard to pen its good, noone is going to be trading with hulldown 113s anyway. The only reason to pick the 430U over the 113 is gun handling.

 

So like I said, the 430U might replace 113s, but its not going to replace WZ5As. The reason they are picked is the good gun handling combined with great dpm and 490 alpha and -7 gun dep. None of which the 430U offers.  

 

And the 430U brings nothing completely new to the table, so the only change is prob goign to be changing 113s to 430Us.



Ricky_Rolls #5 Posted 28 January 2018 - 12:50 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Beta Tester
  • 66954 battles
  • 1,330
  • Member since:
    11-10-2010
Pretty sure the 705a will rarely be seen and will be pretty much useless. The 268v4 should be seen a lot more often than the actual 263 just because the armor is stupidly thick. About the 430u, i still thinl it's a worse 113 but we'll see.

brumbarr #6 Posted 28 January 2018 - 01:03 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 38626 battles
  • 6,326
  • Member since:
    07-30-2012

View PostRicky_Rolls, on 28 January 2018 - 12:50 PM, said:

Pretty sure the 705a will rarely be seen and will be pretty much useless. The 268v4 should be seen a lot more often than the actual 263 just because the armor is stupidly thick. About the 430u, i still thinl it's a worse 113 but we'll see.

 

I compared it to a 113, the 430U is better in every way.

Edited by brumbarr, 28 January 2018 - 01:03 PM.


G01ngToxicCommand0 #7 Posted 28 January 2018 - 01:10 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 37465 battles
  • 727
  • Member since:
    11-03-2011

View PostDammonar, on 27 January 2018 - 08:46 PM, said:

I don't know about 705a or the new TD whatever its called but im sure it will hit the meta like a sledge..  

 

Can you speculate on how it will change the cw/advance tactics in maps that you can't have only superheavies?

Thanks.

 

Let me reiterate; All players should sell all off their non soviet vehicles then the game will be balanced.

HundeWurst #8 Posted 28 January 2018 - 01:50 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 69911 battles
  • 4,337
  • [ROIDS] ROIDS
  • Member since:
    02-06-2012

View PostDammonar, on 27 January 2018 - 08:46 PM, said:

I don't know about 705a or the new TD whatever its called but im sure it will hit the meta like a sledge..  

 

Can you speculate on how it will change the cw/advance tactics in maps that you can't have only superheavies?

Thanks.

 

I am a bit out of touch, but I dont think they will have much of an impact. The Type 5 will still rule supreme, and for damage output you will still pick something like the SuperConqueror.

The obj. 430U might be a bit different. However the slightly slower topspeed might make the 907 the more interesting tank. But time will tell.



Jumping_Turtle #9 Posted 28 January 2018 - 02:01 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 61415 battles
  • 5,306
  • [CNUT] CNUT
  • Member since:
    10-15-2013

View Postbrumbarr, on 28 January 2018 - 01:03 PM, said:

 

I compared it to a 113, the 430U is better in every way.

 

and compared with the 140 and 907 ?

brumbarr #10 Posted 28 January 2018 - 02:02 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 38626 battles
  • 6,326
  • Member since:
    07-30-2012

View PostJumping_Turtle, on 28 January 2018 - 02:01 PM, said:

 

and compared with the 140 and 907 ?

 

THe 430U is a better tank, but the 907 and 140 are different  enough to still make the  be used in the way they are. A 430U can not take over the role of a 907 or 140.  ( we are talking about CW here)

Edited by brumbarr, 28 January 2018 - 02:02 PM.


Jumping_Turtle #11 Posted 28 January 2018 - 02:26 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 61415 battles
  • 5,306
  • [CNUT] CNUT
  • Member since:
    10-15-2013

View Postbrumbarr, on 28 January 2018 - 02:02 PM, said:

 

THe 430U is a better tank, but the 907 and 140 are different  enough to still make the  be used in the way they are. A 430U can not take over the role of a 907 or 140.  ( we are talking about CW here)

 

So basicly not much changing at the mediums. Too bad, kinda hoping that de 430u would be a poor mans 907 ..... that would even things out a bit or us common folks ;)

brumbarr #12 Posted 28 January 2018 - 02:37 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 38626 battles
  • 6,326
  • Member since:
    07-30-2012

View PostJumping_Turtle, on 28 January 2018 - 02:26 PM, said:

 

So basicly not much changing at the mediums. Too bad, kinda hoping that de 430u would be a poor mans 907 ..... that would even things out a bit or us common folks ;)

 

Well, the 430U is the better tank. So in randoms its better than the 907 imo. In clanwars, the 907 is used as a fast force with lots of DPM.  430U doesnt have the dpm to take that role.

soul3ater #13 Posted 28 January 2018 - 02:38 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 18764 battles
  • 635
  • Member since:
    07-27-2012
430U being better than 907 thou lul




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users