Jump to content


should tier X premium tanks be available to get with some amount of bounds?

premium tank tierX

  • Please log in to reply
19 replies to this topic

Poll: Make tier X premium tanks availabe in exchange of bounds (25 members have cast votes)

You have to complete 250 battles in order to participate this poll.

should tier X premium tanks be available to get with some amount of bounds?

  1. yes (13 votes [52.00%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 52.00%

  2. No! bad idea (12 votes [48.00%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 48.00%

If yes then, what should be the condition.

  1. with more than 100000 bounds (10 votes [37.04%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 37.04%

  2. with some bounds not less than 50000 and some gold not less than 10000 (8 votes [29.63%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 29.63%

  3. with some bounds and some hard to pass missions (9 votes [33.33%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 33.33%

Vote Hide poll

MegaDeltaFighter #1 Posted 01 February 2018 - 02:09 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 31592 battles
  • 90
  • [GRFIN] GRFIN
  • Member since:
    08-10-2016
not cw tanks, just some tier X premium
what do you think?

Edited by MegaDeltaFighter, 01 February 2018 - 02:14 PM.


SunDoas #2 Posted 01 February 2018 - 02:12 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 16004 battles
  • 37
  • [CRBER] CRBER
  • Member since:
    12-31-2014
If you speak about cw tanks, then ofc no, go earn one in cw like every one does, not just grind random battles and get that tank.

kdaag #3 Posted 01 February 2018 - 02:27 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 23013 battles
  • 19
  • [SWEPA] SWEPA
  • Member since:
    12-10-2015

What a funny set of voting options.

 

By saying 50 and 100K you are basically saying "NO you shouldn't be able to buy them with bonds".


 

As a highly average player I have played both seasons of Ranked battles and all Bond missions and quite a few normal tier X games and have managed to save up 10000 bonds.


 

During the Gambit they sold CW tanks for 4000 bonds and this seems like a reasonable price. Maybe the price point should be 5000 if you are not required to play CW or a special mission.


 

CW reward tanks should NOT be exclusive to people who happen to be part of a good clan or have rigged the MM to get a t22 in the past. Especially not blatantly OP tanks such as the 907.


 

Many people seem to think that they are entitled to be the sole owners of exclusive gifts just because they did something in the past. Participating in, and doing reasonably well, in ranked takes just as much effort as playing CW as therefore the potential rewards should correspond.


 

In addition the could also sell "legacy tanks" such as Foch 155 and 215b for bonds as the only way to have gotten these was to be at a certain point in the tech tree before they were removed. If players wish to spend bonds on tanks that were removed and replaced with something better this is in my opinion ok.


 


 

 

 

 



SunDoas #4 Posted 01 February 2018 - 02:37 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 16004 battles
  • 37
  • [CRBER] CRBER
  • Member since:
    12-31-2014

View Postkdaag, on 01 February 2018 - 02:27 PM, said:

What a funny set of voting options.

 

By saying 50 and 100K you are basically saying "NO you shouldn't be able to buy them with bonds".


 

As a highly average player I have played both seasons of Ranked battles and all Bond missions and quite a few normal tier X games and have managed to save up 10000 bonds.


 

During the Gambit they sold CW tanks for 4000 bonds and this seems like a reasonable price. Maybe the price point should be 5000 if you are not required to play CW or a special mission.


 

CW reward tanks should NOT be exclusive to people who happen to be part of a good clan or have rigged the MM to get a t22 in the past. Especially not blatantly OP tanks such as the 907.


 

Many people seem to think that they are entitled to be the sole owners of exclusive gifts just because they did something in the past. Participating in, and doing reasonably well, in ranked takes just as much effort as playing CW as therefore the potential rewards should correspond.


 

In addition the could also sell "legacy tanks" such as Foch 155 and 215b for bonds as the only way to have gotten these was to be at a certain point in the tech tree before they were removed. If players wish to spend bonds on tanks that were removed and replaced with something better this is in my opinion ok.


 


 

 

 

 

Why they should not be exclusive? some people and mediocre clans plays a lot during cw, to get permission to buy tank, and other just want to do nothing and have an opportunity to get one.

 

If they will sell legacy tanks for bonds, then yes it is good thing, as maybe not all was able or even playing wot in those days, when they where taken out from the game.



Jigzy84 #5 Posted 01 February 2018 - 03:06 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 26770 battles
  • 846
  • [H2VOC] H2VOC
  • Member since:
    03-13-2013

View PostSunDoas, on 01 February 2018 - 08:37 AM, said:

Why they should not be exclusive? some people and mediocre clans plays a lot during cw, to get permission to buy tank, and other just want to do nothing and have an opportunity to get one.

 

If they will sell legacy tanks for bonds, then yes it is good thing, as maybe not all was able or even playing wot in those days, when they where taken out from the game.

 

Why should they be exclusive & why is it good to have  a "legacy tank" available for bonds??

ValkyrionX #6 Posted 01 February 2018 - 03:07 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 40523 battles
  • 878
  • [VIVUS] VIVUS
  • Member since:
    02-07-2015

ehmm... how about no? 

 

 



Jigzy84 #7 Posted 01 February 2018 - 03:08 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 26770 battles
  • 846
  • [H2VOC] H2VOC
  • Member since:
    03-13-2013

View PostMegaDeltaFighter, on 01 February 2018 - 08:09 AM, said:

should tier X premium tanks be available to get with some amount of bounds?

You can select maximum of 1 answer

  1.  yes
  2.  No! bad idea

If yes then, what should be the condition.

  1.  with more than 100000 bounds
  2.  with some bounds not less than 50000 and some gold not less than 10000
  3.  with some bounds and some hard to pass missions

 

You can't actually vote no as it forces you to answer question 2 which isn't applicable if you vote no so your poll only allows yes votes!

MegaDeltaFighter #8 Posted 01 February 2018 - 03:16 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 31592 battles
  • 90
  • [GRFIN] GRFIN
  • Member since:
    08-10-2016

View PostJigzy84, on 01 February 2018 - 03:08 PM, said:

 

You can't actually vote no as it forces you to answer question 2 which isn't applicable if you vote no so your poll only allows yes votes!

 

you can vote no, second question means if you vote yes (or you vote no but WG decided otherwise)  what should be the condition.

imendars #9 Posted 01 February 2018 - 03:17 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 10939 battles
  • 1,071
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    04-17-2014

I wish i could get them for money...

Since i'm solo junkie i can forget about any cw rewards

Oh well...  :(



imendars #10 Posted 01 February 2018 - 03:18 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 10939 battles
  • 1,071
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    04-17-2014

View PostMegaDeltaFighter, on 01 February 2018 - 05:16 PM, said:

 

you can vote no, second question means if you vote yes (or you vote no but WG decided otherwise)  what should be the condition.

 

You cant cause without selecting anything in second pole, you cant post answer.

Geno1isme #11 Posted 01 February 2018 - 03:24 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 40053 battles
  • 6,590
  • [TRYIT] TRYIT
  • Member since:
    09-03-2013
ROFL @ poll options, 100k bonds is like 10 years of ranked battles. Servers will shut down before you farm that much.

MegaDeltaFighter #12 Posted 01 February 2018 - 03:36 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 31592 battles
  • 90
  • [GRFIN] GRFIN
  • Member since:
    08-10-2016

View PostGeno1isme, on 01 February 2018 - 03:24 PM, said:

ROFL @ poll options, 100k bonds is like 10 years of ranked battles. Servers will shut down before you farm that much.

WG has said there will be more ways to earn bounds, with current  "Bonds: The Grand Hunt" you have been able to get some k bounds, that 100k bound is considered having this in mind that WG will repeat such missions frequently let say once a month

 



Geno1isme #13 Posted 01 February 2018 - 03:42 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 40053 battles
  • 6,590
  • [TRYIT] TRYIT
  • Member since:
    09-03-2013

View PostMegaDeltaFighter, on 01 February 2018 - 04:36 PM, said:

WG has said there will be more ways to earn bounds, with current  "Bonds: The Grand Hunt" you have been able to get some k bounds, that 100k bound is considered having this in mind that WG will repeat such missions frequently let say once a month

 

Sorry to dissappoint you, but that mission was an exception to "compensate" for the mismatch of bond-rewards in CW and bond-price for the CW reward tanks. And the "more ways to earn bonds" have already been implemented with bonds-for-medals and bonds-for-T10-matches, and you're not gonna make 100k with those either.

Bucifel #14 Posted 01 February 2018 - 03:46 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 27736 battles
  • 1,373
  • [3NRGY] 3NRGY
  • Member since:
    03-18-2013

its not that bad idea...especially for Deleted tanks like Foch 155, and FVs

Special vehicles deserve to be bought with "special" curency

but i agree this idea only for reward vehicles wich are not CW rewards (there are a lot if you check tanks.gg)



xx984 #15 Posted 01 February 2018 - 03:46 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 50839 battles
  • 2,066
  • [GO-IN] GO-IN
  • Member since:
    08-11-2013

View PostValkyrionX, on 01 February 2018 - 02:07 PM, said:

ehmm... how about no? 

 

 

 

Beat me to it :sceptic:

Bucifel #16 Posted 01 February 2018 - 03:48 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 27736 battles
  • 1,373
  • [3NRGY] 3NRGY
  • Member since:
    03-18-2013

*wrong post..sorry*


Edited by Bucifel, 01 February 2018 - 03:53 PM.


SuperDuperOtter #17 Posted 01 February 2018 - 03:51 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 15061 battles
  • 1,290
  • [_7TH_] _7TH_
  • Member since:
    08-19-2013

There should not be any Tier X premium or reward tanks in order to promote Tier X competitive game modes. As having tanks that are not availalbe to everyone through techtrees is detrimental to the perceived fairness/balance of the said competitive game mode.

 

Or, Tier X premium or reward tanks (any Tier X tank not obtainable through techtrees) shouldn't be usable in competitive game modes. For the same reason.


Edited by Kharlos76, 01 February 2018 - 03:56 PM.


eldrak #18 Posted 01 February 2018 - 03:58 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 45831 battles
  • 975
  • [NE-VO] NE-VO
  • Member since:
    01-27-2011

I wouldn't be against them introducing a way to get the removed tier X tanks with Bonds

 

Cost/Requirement could be like:

Have same type tier X in garage (so to buy FV215b 183 you need Badger or FV4005)

Have free slot in garage

Pay 5000 bonds

Pay 6100000 credits



Gremlin182 #19 Posted 01 February 2018 - 04:02 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 45377 battles
  • 7,500
  • Member since:
    04-18-2012

No reason why premium tanks couldn't be available at every tier.

Just for bonds no probably even worse idea, If we have to face them in randoms then buying them should not be restricted to bonds.

The only thing against it is the argument that a player can start the game at tier 1 and immediately buy a tier 10 tank.

They would then drag their team down by their lack of experience.

This is very true but it happens at tiers 1-8 anyone can  buy a tier 8 and plenty of players complain about it.

Forcing everyone to play and earn their way to tier 10 achieves nothing you can still get there and be not very good.

 

The answer is to provide all players with alternatives to random games places where players can only take part based on ability

Doubt they would they sell that many given the price they would likely give them I would think we could reasonably expect £50 or more.


Edited by Gremlin182, 01 February 2018 - 07:09 PM.


kdaag #20 Posted 01 February 2018 - 04:25 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 23013 battles
  • 19
  • [SWEPA] SWEPA
  • Member since:
    12-10-2015

Cost/Requirement could be like:

Have same type tier X in garage (so to buy FV215b 183 you need Badger or FV4005)

Have free slot in garage

Pay 5000 bonds

Pay 6100000 credits

 

 

 

 

 

This is actually a good idea, it requires you to:


 

1. Have some previous knowledge of playing tier X tanks

2. Having spent the time and effort to grind 5000 bonds, this is way more of an effort than to play CW!

3. Have to spend either credits/or special mission to qualify for buying the tank.


 

CW players should rejoice because an influx of new players makes 3-marking these tanks easier and gives arty players more OP tanks to concentrate on. (I  always target CW tanks when playing arty as they are both OP and the best players.)






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users