Jump to content


what about an austro-hungarian tech tree to fix the hungarian high tier problems?

Hungarian nations

  • Please log in to reply
49 replies to this topic

CamperKaempfer #1 Posted 01 February 2018 - 05:21 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 21686 battles
  • 356
  • Member since:
    01-10-2017
i said austro-hungarian, referencing the old empire that lasted until the end of ww1, not astrohungarian, which is how you call hungarians in space. the topic of a hungarian tree has been talked a lot about, but there has been found no solution to the gap at high tiers. so what about we mix the hungarian tanks with cold war austrian tanks such as the kurassier? would it be demeaning to either the hungarians or the austrians?

Grand_Moff_Tano #2 Posted 01 February 2018 - 05:30 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 1202 battles
  • 10,256
  • [BC28] BC28
  • Member since:
    05-20-2011

As long as we get an Israeli-South Korean Tech Tree :D

 

On a serious note it could be interesting, espiecally with the SK-105 as the Tier 10 Tank Destroyer, and the Nimrod at Tier 4 of the same branch.


Edited by Chipmunk_of_Vengeance, 01 February 2018 - 05:31 PM.


CamperKaempfer #3 Posted 01 February 2018 - 05:32 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 21686 battles
  • 356
  • Member since:
    01-10-2017

View PostChipmunk_of_Vengeance, on 01 February 2018 - 05:30 PM, said:

As long as we get an Israeli-South Korean Tech Tree :D

 

but austria and hungary were a single political entity for a very long time until the end of ww1, or is your humour lost on me again?

Grand_Moff_Tano #4 Posted 01 February 2018 - 05:32 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 1202 battles
  • 10,256
  • [BC28] BC28
  • Member since:
    05-20-2011

View PostCamperKaempfer, on 01 February 2018 - 04:32 PM, said:

 

but austria and hungary were a single political entity for a very long time until the end of ww1, or is your humour lost on me again?

 

Read the edit, I wasn't being serious with the Korean-Israeli tree

CamperKaempfer #5 Posted 01 February 2018 - 05:46 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 21686 battles
  • 356
  • Member since:
    01-10-2017

View PostChipmunk_of_Vengeance, on 01 February 2018 - 05:32 PM, said:

 

Read the edit, I wasn't being serious with the Korean-Israeli tree

 

i know it wasn't serious but i couldn't tell if it was tongue-in-cheek sarcasm or actual sarcasm. i still got a problem with the hybrid tree: tier 8 and 9 are still missing



Grand_Moff_Tano #6 Posted 01 February 2018 - 05:51 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 1202 battles
  • 10,256
  • [BC28] BC28
  • Member since:
    05-20-2011

View PostCamperKaempfer, on 01 February 2018 - 04:46 PM, said:

 

i know it wasn't serious but i couldn't tell if it was tongue-in-cheek sarcasm or actual sarcasm. i still got a problem with the hybrid tree: tier 8 and 9 are still missing

 

Same with Tank Destroyers, not really enough Light tanks to get to Tier 10, so the SK would take the TD spot, but then you got enough TD's for the Hungarians from Tier 3 to 7 + the Tier 10 SK 105 from the Austrians, so yeah no Tier 8 or 9 without fakes.

Edited by Chipmunk_of_Vengeance, 01 February 2018 - 05:52 PM.


dimethylcadmium #7 Posted 01 February 2018 - 05:53 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 4566 battles
  • 770
  • [WGL-A] WGL-A
  • Member since:
    11-24-2017
Please, no more tank lines, even the Polish and Italian are unnecessary.

TheOneAboveAII #8 Posted 01 February 2018 - 06:15 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 12064 battles
  • 443
  • [S4LT] S4LT
  • Member since:
    07-14-2016

View Postdimethylcadmium, on 01 February 2018 - 04:53 PM, said:

Please, no more tank lines, even the Polish and Italian are unnecessary.

As long as they are not broken(which, lets be honest, we just can't trust wg to make balanced tanks) I don't see the problem...the more the better.


Edited by TheOneAboveAII, 01 February 2018 - 06:16 PM.


dimethylcadmium #9 Posted 01 February 2018 - 06:55 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 4566 battles
  • 770
  • [WGL-A] WGL-A
  • Member since:
    11-24-2017

View PostTheOneAboveAII, on 01 February 2018 - 06:15 PM, said:

As long as they are not broken(which, lets be honest, we just can't trust wg to make balanced tanks) I don't see the problem...the more the better.

 

We already have 300+ tanks in the game. WG needs to add more maps and to buff/nerf tanks that need that. I would also be happy if WG added dynamic weather similar to WoT console after we get HD maps. 

Edited by dimethylcadmium, 01 February 2018 - 06:56 PM.


bitslice #10 Posted 01 February 2018 - 06:58 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 21680 battles
  • 541
  • Member since:
    12-28-2013

What we need are more Russian mediums,

and preferably the whole of the Russian tech-tree renamed so that everything is called Obj-something xxx



CamperKaempfer #11 Posted 01 February 2018 - 07:25 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 21686 battles
  • 356
  • Member since:
    01-10-2017

View Postdimethylcadmium, on 01 February 2018 - 05:53 PM, said:

Please, no more tank lines, even the Polish and Italian are unnecessary.

 

well it's not like we can sway wag's opinion in any direction. they're not really into what is discussed here about tech trees. this is only meant for fun. i think what is urging them to release the italians can be traced back to war thunder doing the same, and wg fearing a migration of players

Browarszky #12 Posted 01 February 2018 - 08:08 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 14904 battles
  • 2,754
  • [I-S-L] I-S-L
  • Member since:
    12-03-2013
And if you can't have enough stuff for a tree, you can always opt for a tech bush. :bush:

EltvilleTiger #13 Posted 01 February 2018 - 08:20 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 20506 battles
  • 1,532
  • [BBMM] BBMM
  • Member since:
    08-24-2011

not another tree..  this game needs maps, weather, other features... something... anything besides the same old "new things".  Bring some new dynamics to the game... please no more Soviet variants.  We are chocked full of those.  

 

Wait... we don't have an Object 300 series line....  :B



Tidal_Force #14 Posted 01 February 2018 - 10:58 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 16000 battles
  • 6,774
  • Member since:
    08-29-2012

View PostCamperKaempfer, on 01 February 2018 - 04:46 PM, said:

 

i know it wasn't serious but i couldn't tell if it was tongue-in-cheek sarcasm or actual sarcasm. i still got a problem with the hybrid tree: tier 8 and 9 are still missing

 

Edited.

 

As for the idea itself, it makes as much sense as making say, Polish-Lithuanian tree or any other tree based by long dead political union. Austro-Hungary dissolved before armoured warfare took off. Only some of T1 tanks (like French FT17) even existed concurrently with Austro-Hungary.

 

This post has been edited by the moderation team due to inflammatory remarks.

 

 


Edited by VMX, 02 February 2018 - 10:43 AM.


Grand_Moff_Tano #15 Posted 01 February 2018 - 11:15 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 1202 battles
  • 10,256
  • [BC28] BC28
  • Member since:
    05-20-2011

View PostTidal_Force, on 01 February 2018 - 09:58 PM, said:

As for the idea itself, it makes as much sense as making say, Polish-Lithuanian tree or any other tree based by long dead political union. Austro-Hungary dissolved before armoured warfare took off. Only some of T1 tanks (like French FT17) even existed concurrently with Austro-Hungary.

Apart from the bad case of harassment which I'll just ignore, I don't think there really is enough vehicles for an Austro-Hungarian tech tree anyway without reverting to copy-paste vehicles.



Tinbawx #16 Posted 02 February 2018 - 01:00 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 14709 battles
  • 1,199
  • [SNOB] SNOB
  • Member since:
    01-31-2011

View PostCamperKaempfer, on 01 February 2018 - 05:21 PM, said:

.......so what about we mix the hungarian tanks with cold war austrian tanks such as the kurassier?.........................

 

Which ones? The definetly very austrian M60?

Grand_Moff_Tano #17 Posted 02 February 2018 - 01:02 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 1202 battles
  • 10,256
  • [BC28] BC28
  • Member since:
    05-20-2011

View PostTinbawx, on 02 February 2018 - 12:00 AM, said:

 

Which ones? The definetly very austrian M60?

 

There is also the Austrian M47, and Charioteer.

Edited by Chipmunk_of_Vengeance, 02 February 2018 - 01:07 AM.


Tinbawx #18 Posted 02 February 2018 - 01:15 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 14709 battles
  • 1,199
  • [SNOB] SNOB
  • Member since:
    01-31-2011

View PostChipmunk_of_Vengeance, on 02 February 2018 - 01:02 AM, said:

 

There is also the Austrian M47, and Charioteer.

 

Holy crap, I didn´t know we had Charioteers.

Add Chaffees and T-34s to the mix we´re almost there.

Very unique, very austrian :teethhappy:.



Grand_Moff_Tano #19 Posted 02 February 2018 - 01:37 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 1202 battles
  • 10,256
  • [BC28] BC28
  • Member since:
    05-20-2011

View PostTinbawx, on 02 February 2018 - 12:15 AM, said:

 

Holy crap, I didn´t know we had Charioteers.

Add Chaffees and T-34s to the mix we´re almost there.

Very unique, very austrian :teethhappy:.

Oh yeah, apparently you also had Centurions, or the Turrets at least.



Pansenmann #20 Posted 02 February 2018 - 01:48 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 33268 battles
  • 12,024
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    08-17-2012

View Postdimethylcadmium, on 01 February 2018 - 06:55 PM, said:

 

We already have 300+ tanks in the game. WG needs to add more maps and to buff/nerf tanks that need that. I would also be happy if WG added dynamic weather similar to WoT console after we get HD maps. 

 

I second that.

Dragon Ridge in HD would be nice. or "port"

 

didnt yugoslavia also have M36 with heat ammo?

would quite fit in that tech tree too


Edited by Pansenmann, 02 February 2018 - 01:50 AM.






Also tagged with Hungarian, nations

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users