Jump to content


T26E4 Super pershing needs buff


  • Please log in to reply
26 replies to this topic

DragonFighter2003 #1 Posted 05 February 2018 - 02:02 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 7501 battles
  • 12
  • Member since:
    04-25-2015

Hello tankers i wanted to ask you do you thing that T26E4 Super Pershing needs buff.I've seen that the other tier 8 premium medium tank FV4202 has been buffed a lot but the pershing has only one buff and it is 20 pen more i thing that the gun is very bad its engine its very bad and a lot of stuff that Super Pershing needs to be buffed.Can we ask wargaming to buff it or i don't know.Write your opinions about this topic.

And sorry for how many times i have said buff :D



ValkyrionX #2 Posted 05 February 2018 - 02:07 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 40470 battles
  • 875
  • [VIVUS] VIVUS
  • Member since:
    02-07-2015
buff your way to play..? 

Gboor #3 Posted 05 February 2018 - 02:08 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 18514 battles
  • 452
  • Member since:
    11-09-2014
FCM needs buff it gas terrible gun handling, Jt88 needs buff its slow and has very low penetration, 

IS-6 NEEDS BUFF THE GUN IS VERY BAD ONLY 175 PENETRATION AND SO BAD AIM. CAN WE ASK WARGAMING TO BUFF IT OR I DON'T KNOW. WRITE YOUR OPINIONS ABOUT THIS

Edited by Gboor, 05 February 2018 - 02:09 PM.


Chipmunk_of_Vengeance #4 Posted 05 February 2018 - 02:09 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 1196 battles
  • 10,038
  • [BC28] BC28
  • Member since:
    05-20-2011
We've been asking for it to get its historical engine to no avail for ages.

TacticusMK2 #5 Posted 05 February 2018 - 02:13 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 15671 battles
  • 590
  • [DUAL] DUAL
  • Member since:
    02-09-2014
T26E4 is fine, although i'd like to see the engine improved.

The tanks that REALLY need buffs are all those tier 8 premiums with 175 pen... especially when the gold ammo is HEAT they are tedious to play.

DragonFighter2003 #6 Posted 05 February 2018 - 02:16 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 7501 battles
  • 12
  • Member since:
    04-25-2015

i dont ask for too much i ask for a little engine buff this tank is slow as [edited]

 



Chipmunk_of_Vengeance #7 Posted 05 February 2018 - 02:17 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 1196 battles
  • 10,038
  • [BC28] BC28
  • Member since:
    05-20-2011

View PostTacticusMK2, on 05 February 2018 - 01:13 PM, said:

T26E4 is fine, although i'd like to see the engine improved.

The tanks that REALLY need buffs are all those tier 8 premiums with 175 pen... especially when the gold ammo is HEAT they are tedious to play.

 

It could also do with being reclassified as a Heavy, since it pretty much is one.

Chipmunk_of_Vengeance #8 Posted 05 February 2018 - 02:18 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 1196 battles
  • 10,038
  • [BC28] BC28
  • Member since:
    05-20-2011

View PostDragonFighter2003, on 05 February 2018 - 01:16 PM, said:

i dont ask for too much i ask for a little engine buff this tank is slow as [edited]

 

 

We've been asking for it to get the historical engine for ages, but WG have continuously declined to give it that much.

DragonFighter2003 #9 Posted 05 February 2018 - 02:19 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 7501 battles
  • 12
  • Member since:
    04-25-2015
can someone tell me what is the one good thing in super pershing?

Chipmunk_of_Vengeance #10 Posted 05 February 2018 - 02:20 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 1196 battles
  • 10,038
  • [BC28] BC28
  • Member since:
    05-20-2011
The gun, it isn't half bad, can give even the Type 59 a run for its money, especially when combined with the spaced armour at the front.

Edited by Chipmunk_of_Vengeance, 05 February 2018 - 02:20 PM.


DragonFighter2003 #11 Posted 05 February 2018 - 02:22 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 7501 battles
  • 12
  • Member since:
    04-25-2015
I will not lie that pershing makes a lot of me but engine is really bad

Balc0ra #12 Posted 05 February 2018 - 02:23 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 62749 battles
  • 14,352
  • [WALL] WALL
  • Member since:
    07-10-2012

View PostDragonFighter2003, on 05 February 2018 - 02:02 PM, said:

Hello tankers i wanted to ask you do you thing that T26E4 Super Pershing needs buff.I've seen that the other tier 8 premium medium tank FV4202 has been buffed a lot but the pershing has only one buff and it is 20 pen more i thing that the gun is very bad its engine its very bad and a lot of stuff that Super Pershing needs to be buffed.Can we ask wargaming to buff it or i don't know.Write your opinions about this topic.

 

If it's any Pref MM tier 8 that works better then the others atm, and don't need buffs over any of the other Pref MM tier 8's. It's the T26E4.  And the 4202 sees tier X, SP don't. And the FV got mobility buffs, not a ROF buff that it really needs. SP got a pen buff that it really needed.

 

The Patton KR and T25 Pilot has 192 pen... And sees tier X. The Normal tier 8 US med the Pershing has 190 pen. Heck the T95E2 & T69 has 181 pen and faces tier X. So the T26E4 is not bad off on the gun side of things vs other US meds considering it sees tier 9 max.

 

Tbh, the gun is one of the reasons I keep playing it vs my other Pref MM tier 8's.

 

View PostChipmunk_of_Vengeance, on 05 February 2018 - 02:09 PM, said:

We've been asking for it to get its historical engine to no avail for ages.

 

From a balance standpoint I kinda see why they haven not done it in the past. But considering how the engine buffed worked for the Lowe in the current meta. Why not at this point.

 

View PostChipmunk_of_Vengeance, on 05 February 2018 - 02:17 PM, said:

 

It could also do with being reclassified as a Heavy, since it pretty much is one.

 

Them we might as well make the 50 100 a Med, as it's more or less played like one.


Edited by Balc0ra, 05 February 2018 - 02:25 PM.


DragonFighter2003 #13 Posted 05 February 2018 - 02:28 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 7501 battles
  • 12
  • Member since:
    04-25-2015
I love this forum i thought that no one would write on this post but there was some people that commented i really love wot forum

Chipmunk_of_Vengeance #14 Posted 05 February 2018 - 02:30 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 1196 battles
  • 10,038
  • [BC28] BC28
  • Member since:
    05-20-2011

View PostBalc0ra, on 05 February 2018 - 01:23 PM, said:

From a balance standpoint I kinda see why they haven not done it in the past. But considering how the engine buffed worked for the Lowe in the current meta. Why not at this point.

 

 

Them we might as well make the 50 100 a Med, as it's more or less played like one.

Well, I can't see why they haven't. the SP has always been slow as hell

 

As for the 50 100, technically it was a Medium upto the AMX 50 120 iirc.


Edited by Chipmunk_of_Vengeance, 05 February 2018 - 02:37 PM.


Chipmunk_of_Vengeance #15 Posted 05 February 2018 - 02:32 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 1196 battles
  • 10,038
  • [BC28] BC28
  • Member since:
    05-20-2011

View PostDragonFighter2003, on 05 February 2018 - 01:28 PM, said:

I love this forum i thought that no one would write on this post but there was some people that commented i really love wot forum

 

That opinion will soon change once you explore all the whine posts about Arty and Gold Shells lol

Balc0ra #16 Posted 05 February 2018 - 02:47 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 62749 battles
  • 14,352
  • [WALL] WALL
  • Member since:
    07-10-2012

View PostChipmunk_of_Vengeance, on 05 February 2018 - 02:30 PM, said:

Well, I can't see why they haven't. the SP has always been slow as hell

 

Slow yes. But that speed vs the armor before worked. Then after the nerf, they should have buffed the speed to compensate as the armor was mostly useless. As it had only 1 plate, and the 2nd plate was lowered to below the MG port and made part of the hull instead. But then it would be broken again after they buffed it back to the old armor layout of 2 plates etc. But many metas have come and gone since then. So now it would make sense. More so then vs before.

Chipmunk_of_Vengeance #17 Posted 05 February 2018 - 02:49 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 1196 battles
  • 10,038
  • [BC28] BC28
  • Member since:
    05-20-2011

View PostBalc0ra, on 05 February 2018 - 01:47 PM, said:

 

Slow yes. But that speed vs the armor before worked. Then after the nerf, they should have buffed the speed to compensate as the armor was mostly useless. As it had only 1 plate, and the 2nd plate was lowered to below the MG port and made part of the hull instead. But then it would be broken again after they buffed it back to the old armor layout of 2 plates etc. But many metas have come and gone since then. So now it would make sense. More so then vs before.

 

Maybe, but when you compare it to its old penetration stats, that speed killed the tank, it was practically useless unless you used Gold ammo, though the armour made it great at taking out anything below Tier 7.

Leftouras #18 Posted 12 February 2018 - 09:31 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 4776 battles
  • 2
  • Member since:
    05-01-2015

I traded my Type-59 I got from Christmas with this, thinking that it is a well-armored medium with an ok gun and pref MM. I was totally wrong. The engine is awful, the gun well below-average and the armor unreliable. Additionally, it rarely sees lower tiers with the new MM.

Super Pershing desperately needs a buff in engine power and gun accuracy, or just remove pref. MM and give it better engine + significantly buffed alpha damage and pen or, alternatively, gun accuracy and pen.



vasilinhorulezz #19 Posted 12 February 2018 - 09:50 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 21101 battles
  • 866
  • Member since:
    09-26-2014
-insert tank name- needs buff.

vasilinhorulezz #20 Posted 12 February 2018 - 09:51 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 21101 battles
  • 866
  • Member since:
    09-26-2014

View PostLeftouras, on 12 February 2018 - 09:31 PM, said:

I traded my Type-59 I got from Christmas with this, thinking that it is a well-armored medium with an ok gun and pref MM. I was totally wrong. The engine is awful, the gun well below-average and the armor unreliable. Additionally, it rarely sees lower tiers with the new MM.

Super Pershing desperately needs a buff in engine power and gun accuracy, or just remove pref. MM and give it better engine + significantly buffed alpha damage and pen or, alternatively, gun accuracy and pen.

 

You did what  :ohmy::confused::amazed::confused:?




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users