Jump to content


Platoon of 3 got all the kills


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
89 replies to this topic

VsUK #1 Posted 05 February 2018 - 03:28 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 14288 battles
  • 1,301
  • Member since:
    06-19-2012
Just had 2 strange games in my WT Auf Pz. First game the enemy just whitewashed us without getting a single kill. Then noticed the second game the same platoon in the battle & again, they got all the kills between them. Now, happening once is odd, happening twice is what?

Simeon85 #2 Posted 05 February 2018 - 03:32 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 1097 battles
  • 1,375
  • Member since:
    04-19-2013

View PostVsUK, on 05 February 2018 - 03:28 PM, said:

happening twice is what?

 

A platoon of good players carrying, in two games. Not sure how that is odd or unexpected when platoons like that generally win around 65-70% of their games if not more. 



Dava_117 #3 Posted 05 February 2018 - 03:33 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 17589 battles
  • 2,188
  • [B-BAS] B-BAS
  • Member since:
    12-17-2014
GJ to that platoon! 

VsUK #4 Posted 05 February 2018 - 03:38 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 14288 battles
  • 1,301
  • Member since:
    06-19-2012
So your saying, 2 games in a row, the same platoon gets all the kills & non of the other 12 players we're able to get a kill? You say thats normal do you?

CrniVrag #5 Posted 05 February 2018 - 03:44 PM

    Sergeant

  • Veteran
  • 32815 battles
  • 1,507
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    02-06-2011

View PostVsUK, on 05 February 2018 - 02:38 PM, said:

So your saying, 2 games in a row, the same platoon gets all the kills & non of the other 12 players we're able to get a kill? You say thats normal do you?

 

Yes, because something like that is totally impossible, it must be rigging aliens...

WorkingasIntended #6 Posted 05 February 2018 - 03:44 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 9562 battles
  • 448
  • Member since:
    12-14-2011

Calm down sir. Random means random and you saw a random thing so its potentially normal yes :great:

 

Waiting for the killing shot helps certain people improve their e-peen stats. There do seem to be a lot of players who are incapable of doing much if any damage these days (more so than I remember in the past (no I don't keep a fekin record before certain forumites turn up)) A screenshot or reply would help maybe?


Edited by WorkingasIntended, 05 February 2018 - 03:45 PM.


Simeon85 #7 Posted 05 February 2018 - 03:47 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 1097 battles
  • 1,375
  • Member since:
    04-19-2013

View PostVsUK, on 05 February 2018 - 03:38 PM, said:

So your saying, 2 games in a row, the same platoon gets all the kills & non of the other 12 players we're able to get a kill? You say thats normal do you?

 

With 3-5-7 MM and top tier tanks, that sounds perfectly plausible yes, normal is a completely different matter, but it isn't normal it's just a one off occurrence out of thousands of battles you are trying to insinuate is something more sinister. 

Bora_BOOM #8 Posted 05 February 2018 - 03:49 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 20226 battles
  • 2,494
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    08-23-2014

Its them! DP!

 


Edited by Bora_BOOM, 05 February 2018 - 03:50 PM.


Martijn_mk2 #9 Posted 05 February 2018 - 03:53 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 5840 battles
  • 291
  • Member since:
    03-19-2013
They must have been cheating!!

VsUK #10 Posted 05 February 2018 - 03:56 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 14288 battles
  • 1,301
  • Member since:
    06-19-2012

I got the SS, I often make them after games of note. They weren't together, they all were in different parts of the maps working solo. Thats about as much as I can say as i wasn't alive long.
 

*edited* 

 

View PostBora_BOOM, on 05 February 2018 - 02:49 PM, said:

Its them! DP!

 

 

You do realise video's like that aren't just a one off attempt. They record themselves for hours doing it & just use the shot where they manage to do it & act like it was a first time event. 


 


Edited by Daxeno, 07 February 2018 - 02:37 PM.
This post has been edited by the moderation team due to naming.


K_A #11 Posted 05 February 2018 - 03:58 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 13566 battles
  • 4,656
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    04-18-2013

View PostVsUK, on 05 February 2018 - 02:56 PM, said:

I got the SS, I often make them after games of note. They weren't together, they all were in different parts of the maps working solo. Thats about as much as I can say as i wasn't alive long.
 
*edited*
 

 

That's a dynamic platoon they created in the middle of the battle. 2 tier 10 tanks and a tier 9, impossible to start a battle with that. The 140's might have been platooned together from the start but the 13 90 definitely joined afterwards, presumably for a free crucial contribution medal.

Thejagdpanther #12 Posted 05 February 2018 - 03:59 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 33033 battles
  • 4,244
  • [TKBS] TKBS
  • Member since:
    07-16-2012
Clearly driving superheavy.... lol.

Balc0ra #13 Posted 05 February 2018 - 03:59 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 62806 battles
  • 14,399
  • [WALL] WALL
  • Member since:
    07-10-2012

View PostVsUK, on 05 February 2018 - 03:38 PM, said:

You say thats normal do you?

 

And you have seen this happen to the same platoon twice in a row how many times for it to be considered normal? As you make it sound like it never has happened before.  And if it's the only one you have seen. Then no it's nothing but rare. As if they were top tiers in a 3-5-7 game pushing as a group both games. And if you team allowed them to roll over you one by one vs as a group to. Then sure... Unless you are suggesting something different? Then again how many crucial contributions did they have. If that's high to vs the norm. Why not?

 

View PostVsUK, on 05 February 2018 - 03:56 PM, said:

I got the SS, I often make them after games of note. They weren't together, they all were in different parts of the maps working solo. Thats about as much as I can say as i wasn't alive long

 

Well considering how little the rest of their team did to. As most of them did not even do their own HP in damage. It's safe to say that 3 of the players on the map were overly aggressive. And 15 on your team did not expect that. And based on how little damage your team did. You lot must either have been scattered to be effective. Or fallen back in groups leaving more behind to fight vs more guns.

 

But the 13 90 is part of a dynamic platoon. Not with the tier X meds. As he is one tier lower. And then they were lucky with their random platoons in two games in a row. I suspect they formed the platoon for the CC medal late game vs early game.


Edited by Balc0ra, 05 February 2018 - 04:00 PM.


WorkingasIntended #14 Posted 05 February 2018 - 04:00 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 9562 battles
  • 448
  • Member since:
    12-14-2011

View PostBora_BOOM, on 05 February 2018 - 03:49 PM, said:

Its them! DP!

 

 

​Haxxxxxx :ohmy:

Simeon85 #15 Posted 05 February 2018 - 04:01 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 1097 battles
  • 1,375
  • Member since:
    04-19-2013

View PostK_A, on 05 February 2018 - 03:58 PM, said:

 

That's a dynamic platoon they created in the middle of the battle. 2 tier 10 tanks and a tier 9, impossible to start a battle with that. The 140's might have been platooned together from the start but the 13 90 definitely joined afterwards, presumably for a free crucial contribution medal.

 

This.

 

Plus the Obj. 140 who did the most damage is unicum overall with super unicum recents and the other 140 has unicum recents, and they are 2/3 top tiers in a 3-5-7, in Obj. 140s. 



Kooallu #16 Posted 05 February 2018 - 04:01 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 40807 battles
  • 292
  • Member since:
    12-09-2013

 

forumrule 4. no naming and shaming

Bora_BOOM #17 Posted 05 February 2018 - 04:01 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 20226 battles
  • 2,494
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    08-23-2014

View PostVsUK, on 05 February 2018 - 02:56 PM, said:

I got the SS, I often make them after games of note. They weren't together, they all were in different parts of the maps working solo. Thats about as much as I can say as i wasn't alive long.
 

*edited*

 

You do realise video's like that aren't just a one off attempt. They record themselves for hours doing it & just use the shot where they manage to do it & act like it was a first time event. 


 

 

You do realize that platoon did the same - got it twice out of hundreds?

 

Edit: Or, as noted - dynamic platoon... 



Balc0ra #18 Posted 05 February 2018 - 04:03 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 62806 battles
  • 14,399
  • [WALL] WALL
  • Member since:
    07-10-2012

View PostKooallu, on 05 February 2018 - 04:01 PM, said:

 

forumrule 4. no naming and shaming

 

And who is shaming the platoon group here? They did nothing wrong, nor did they do badly to be shamed for anything.

VsUK #19 Posted 05 February 2018 - 04:03 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 14288 battles
  • 1,301
  • Member since:
    06-19-2012

View PostBalc0ra, on 05 February 2018 - 02:59 PM, said:

 

And you have seen this happen to the same platoon twice in a row how many times for it to be considered normal? As you make it sound like it never has happened before.  And if it's the only one you have seen. Then no it's nothing but rare. As if they were top tiers in a 3-5-7 game pushing as a group both games. And if you team allowed them to roll over you one by one vs as a group to. Then sure... Unless you are suggesting something different? Then again how many crucial contributions did they have. If that's high to vs the norm. Why not?

 

 

Well considering how little the rest of their team did to. As most of them did not even do their own HP in damage. It's safe to say that 3 of the players on the map were overly aggressive. And 15 on your team did not expect that. And based on how little damage your team did. You lot must either have been scattered to be effective. Or fallen back in groups leaving more behind to fight vs more guns.

 

But the 13 90 is part of a dynamic platoon. Not with the tier X meds. As he is one tier lower. And then they were lucky with their random platoons in two games in a row. I suspect they formed the platoon for the CC medal late game vs early game.

 

Yep, my team we're poor. The 2 BC platoons we're capping, had like 12 seconds left & then for some reason, left the cap when the enemy we're no where near to attack & died poorly. The level of intelligence of players is seriously low indeed. I did my best, but handicapped as always by the team.

 

View PostKooallu, on 05 February 2018 - 03:01 PM, said:

 

forumrule 4. no naming and shaming



If you can post replays, why not battle result screenshots? It displays exactly the same thing. So no, not breaking forum rules because no one mentioned names.


Edited by VsUK, 05 February 2018 - 04:04 PM.


WorkingasIntended #20 Posted 05 February 2018 - 04:04 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 9562 battles
  • 448
  • Member since:
    12-14-2011

Pro tip to maintain Sanity,

 

Always get the results screen to sort from the top by either XP or damage. That way you don't feel quite so bad after being slaughtered 15:1 

 

And the RNG was at the end of the vid VsUK

 






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users