Jump to content


Update 9.22 - General Feedback

9.22

  • Please log in to reply
397 replies to this topic

leggasiini #21 Posted 06 February 2018 - 05:26 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 10494 battles
  • 5,938
  • [-GLO-] -GLO-
  • Member since:
    12-01-2012

Completely useless to give feedback (judging from the TD changes) so I wont even bither giving feedback from this patch in these topics.

 

That being said, the Obj 257 is just cancerous again with that side armor change. Its stupid.



botuks #22 Posted 06 February 2018 - 05:34 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 2403 battles
  • 140
  • Member since:
    01-07-2017

STILL DIDN'T GET ANY RESPONSE and I see my topic is delete, so asking here AGAIN:

 

Hello WG. As in 9.21 update you have introduced it new function to costumize tank paint, also was possibile to remove awarded cammo from one tank to another same nation tank, but after second or 3th micropatch it's not possible to do it anymore. So it was a bug, that we could remove camo and use to other tank? What's gonna be next? Now, while I though it's a new functionality, I added special camo set (all seasons pixel camo from last CW campaign) to tanks I grind and I'm really mad, that it stay now for that tank and I can't use to another. Will you fix it some how?



Trinity89 #23 Posted 06 February 2018 - 05:43 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 16382 battles
  • 26
  • Member since:
    10-10-2012
preferential matchmaking will be fixed???

M0RN1NGST4R #24 Posted 06 February 2018 - 05:47 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 32917 battles
  • 126
  • Member since:
    06-26-2011
I have obj 263 and su-122-54 in the garage. Both of them having permanent camo. Will I get a compensation after the removal of the SU in gold for the camo and in credits for the removal of the tank itself?

AldoSsb #25 Posted 06 February 2018 - 05:52 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 8582 battles
  • 47
  • [-AMR-] -AMR-
  • Member since:
    11-10-2017

View PostM0RN1NGST4R, on 06 February 2018 - 05:47 PM, said:

I have obj 263 and su-122-54 in the garage. Both of them having permanent camo. Will I get a compensation after the removal of the SU in gold for the camo and in credits for the removal of the tank itself?

 

I suppose you will get the OBJ 268 V.4 for the OBJ 263 that you have, and you will get the OBJ  263 for the SU-122-54.

Berto72 #26 Posted 06 February 2018 - 05:56 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 57031 battles
  • 825
  • [ORKI] ORKI
  • Member since:
    03-22-2011

Im really sorry to tell this after 7 years of gaming and presence in forum.


But what i have seen, specially now with obj 263 and events, is that WG really dont cares about community opinions.

More than this, players of different regions have differents (a lot) offers and opportunities.

Events is worse year after year and so rewards, introduced by misleading news.

 

Time ago i replied to one moderator, in honestly way (yes, polemic but with no insult or else, just telling the truth) and all that i get as payback was a censor and warning point.
By ticket to support, they was removed, and i am grateful for this.

Surely a single person error is not a company error. Maybe...
Or maybe a company should know that it is represented by those who interact with the public with news (Sneak Peek team)

or with exchange of opinions (moderators), as well as the choices of the marketing department (events)


I think it is time to get away a while surely from the forum, maybe from the game.

 

Im just one, so maybe you dont care about this.  Well, thats is true until one plus one give two. After that will be not only a "one player problem"

 

In six years with forum people i had a lot of fun or fights, contrasts or support...
despite this, in any case it happened to meet us, good hunt and have fun all.

 

Berto72



asari79 #27 Posted 06 February 2018 - 06:08 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 30403 battles
  • 105
  • [_W_C_] _W_C_
  • Member since:
    05-05-2012

hahaha I laughe so much when WG wrote that they made the changes after listing to the players.

 

If you look at the TD posts not even one player want to move the 263 to tier IX cus everyone that posted want to keep it on tier X.

 

But ofc WG still moved it down. WG can ofc do what they want but I don´t understand why they have to lie to use players all the time.

 

WG don´t care what the players think and they don´t have to but it´s not good that they have to lie about it all the time.



803 #28 Posted 06 February 2018 - 06:09 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 6376 battles
  • 55
  • [D076] D076
  • Member since:
    05-05-2013
They still went ahead with that OP Obj. 430U idea? Please delete my 121 and gift me free Obj 430U then, I've been grinding so long to get it, now it is completely useless, with similar mobility and gun, but far far far far far far far far far far far far far far far far far far far far far far far far far far far worse armour.

M0RN1NGST4R #29 Posted 06 February 2018 - 06:13 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 32917 battles
  • 126
  • Member since:
    06-26-2011

View PostAldoSsb, on 06 February 2018 - 04:52 PM, said:

 

I suppose you will get the OBJ 268 V.4 for the OBJ 263 that you have, and you will get the OBJ  263 for the SU-122-54.

 

Yes but if I had only the 263 in the garage, the situation would be the same. I would get the 268-4 for tier X and the 263 at tier 9 for itself.

Pataky #30 Posted 06 February 2018 - 06:31 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 44172 battles
  • 63
  • [WEBOS] WEBOS
  • Member since:
    03-24-2012

Please make your feedback, we still have place to them:

 

 

"We care about our players ideas"



Mad_Cris #31 Posted 06 February 2018 - 06:33 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 39190 battles
  • 60
  • Member since:
    07-21-2012

View PostKandly, on 06 February 2018 - 11:12 AM, said:

Commanders,

 

Please share your general feedback regarding Update 9.22 in this topic.

 

For other types of feedback, consult the following list:

Update 9.22 Feedback - Soviet Medium changes

Update 9.22 Feedback - Soviet Heavy changes

Update 9.22 Feedback - Soviet TD changes

Update 9.22 Feedback - Bug Reports
 

You can also find the portal article here.

 

Cheers,

Kandly

 

Push through anemy lines with a td?!I am a little confuzed here.Or you are losing it or you forget what is the [edited]point of a tank destroyer!Why to emprove bulshit tanks like E50M,T110E5 that lies dead and buried when you can throw at us more [edited]Russian bias comrade why the hell not!Excuse me because i am not that optimistic as you are but in my opinion this is [edited]patetic!

Edited by Mad_Cris, 06 February 2018 - 06:38 PM.


Kandly #32 Posted 06 February 2018 - 06:40 PM

    Community Manager

  • WG Staff
  • 695 battles
  • 686
  • Member since:
    08-23-2016

View PostUnknown_D, on 06 February 2018 - 03:32 PM, said:

When will the new Ranked season start?

 

Hey! I can't share the date now, but I can tell you we'll be announcing it soon.

clocky #33 Posted 06 February 2018 - 06:49 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 19683 battles
  • 697
  • [ONB] ONB
  • Member since:
    10-29-2011

I see that soviet propaganda is not dead.  I understand this game is aimed at the "soviet" market but this is getting  ridiculous.

 

Glad I'm not spending my time in this game.



Steve8066 #34 Posted 06 February 2018 - 07:03 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 10196 battles
  • 616
  • Member since:
    10-06-2015

View PostKandly, on 06 February 2018 - 11:12 AM, said:

Commanders,

 

Please share your general feedback regarding Update 9.22 in this topic.

 

For other types of feedback, consult the following list:

Update 9.22 Feedback - Soviet Medium changes

Update 9.22 Feedback - Soviet Heavy changes

Update 9.22 Feedback - Soviet TD changes

Update 9.22 Feedback - Bug Reports
 

You can also find the portal article here.

 

Cheers,

Kandly

 

no changes to the 357 MM template means patch is a waste of time for me any many others.

GradiusZA #35 Posted 06 February 2018 - 07:05 PM

    Sergeant

  • Beta Tester
  • 18415 battles
  • 279
  • Member since:
    11-06-2010

Will we also be getting a trade-in event like the RU server has currently at the moment?

Otherwise I'm looking forward to the new patch tomorrow :-)



vreemd #36 Posted 06 February 2018 - 07:23 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 18556 battles
  • 27
  • [REBLS] REBLS
  • Member since:
    08-03-2011
  • What will happen if u have both the 
  • Object 263 (Tier X)
  • SU-122-54 (Tier IX)

??

 



Bruecki2938 #37 Posted 06 February 2018 - 07:28 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 5955 battles
  • 239
  • [TRYIT] TRYIT
  • Member since:
    12-19-2016

WG rly?

 

Block Quote

 When it takes too long to assign a player to a battle, the matchmaker may add extra Battle Modes to those you’ve marked. If the wait takes more than 50 seconds, you’ll enter the first available match in any mode.

 

Now I also have to deal with players who have no f* clue about the mode and how the map needs to be played in that mode?

 

Additionally I've Grand Battles disabled - I don't like them. Especially in Super Heavy Tanks because I don't want to crawl for 5 minutes and get perma fapped from 4 arties during crawling!

But now you force me to play a mode I don't like?

 

Who comes up with such BS ideas? Srlsy?

Do you have a dedicated "how to f* up our players" department?

 

The only thing this will cause is even MORE load for your matchmaker because 80 % of the player will hit the "leave button" around 48s.


Edited by Bruecki2938, 06 February 2018 - 07:28 PM.


Volatile_Squirrel #38 Posted 06 February 2018 - 07:36 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 28843 battles
  • 179
  • Member since:
    10-25-2011

Block Quote

It’s the first update of 2018 so we made sure it’s a good one.

 

And you got it wrong from the start.

I really am struggling to find positive post about this patch.

Changes nobody asks for. Tanks nobody wants.

Just... why?



valyan #39 Posted 06 February 2018 - 07:48 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 28542 battles
  • 116
  • [KMKZ] KMKZ
  • Member since:
    04-17-2011

You finnally proved that you indeed ignore the playerbase. I liked the Su 122 54, and my aim was obj 263 and the su122.54(speciffically because they are like they are) since I started that line...but with this update you just plainly f|_|cKeD up everything...

There were so many variants suggested by players so you can keep them both as they are, but, no, you just like to make fun of us...


 

After my premium account expires, I won't buy any for at least a year. And buying premium tanks...bugger off. never.


 

And if the SU-122-54 will be sold in the future in any way or form, in the instant I see it in the shop or wherever, I will instantly uninstall the game, and you can keep your game and shove it somewhere.



BG_Striker #40 Posted 06 February 2018 - 08:00 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 23685 battles
  • 4
  • [BG_WP] BG_WP
  • Member since:
    09-30-2013

After 9.22 update and removal of the SU-122-54 can i still research top gun of the SU-122-54??? 

Because i didn't research it yet.

10x







Also tagged with 9.22

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users