Jump to content


Update 1.0 Common Test Feedback - Map: Fjords

1.0

  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
8 replies to this topic

Kandly #1 Posted 06 February 2018 - 03:26 PM

    Community Manager

  • WG Staff
  • 695 battles
  • 662
  • Member since:
    08-23-2016

Commanders,

 

Please share your feedback regarding the new map in Update 1.0's Common Test in this topic.

 

Cheers,

Kandly



IncandescentGerbil #2 Posted 10 February 2018 - 12:46 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 35597 battles
  • 1,443
  • Member since:
    11-24-2015
Looks very pretty - apart from Waterfall, which doesn't look very convincing at all. 

peldikupaber #3 Posted 10 February 2018 - 09:41 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 4910 battles
  • 9
  • [VABAD] VABAD
  • Member since:
    09-07-2015
This is by far the worst balanced map yet, the team starting on the east side will have every single advantage the map has to offer.

gunslingerXXX #4 Posted 10 February 2018 - 06:34 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 9920 battles
  • 1,386
  • Member since:
    11-16-2014
the field has become very, very, very open. Not sure if this is a good thing

zardikar6 #5 Posted 10 February 2018 - 09:52 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 9202 battles
  • 26
  • Member since:
    07-19-2014

My opinion on this map...

Field is too empty, basically whoever goes there, is in a kill zone because that whole upper side of the map is heavily encouraging camping in yellow zones, i thing upper part of the map is worse than old map, in old map you had some valleys and bushes and now its just straight open field, it look like unfinished map...

 

And waterfall is really bad/low quality... There are maps i cant believe how much redone is better but this one i would vote for the worst "new" map...


Edited by zardikar6, 11 February 2018 - 12:31 AM.


HekePrkl #6 Posted 11 February 2018 - 12:49 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 19125 battles
  • 33
  • [KOSTO] KOSTO
  • Member since:
    03-13-2014

The big water fall looks unfinished and I was thinking "where does all that water come from? Why doesn't it go where the smaller waterfalls are?". I'd remove the big one and leave the smaller ones. Also, hopefully you have thought about where the water continues to go and how it finds it's way to the fjord. I didn't have time to check it out.

Waterfalls and a hovering T57 Heavy


Edited by HekePrkl, 11 February 2018 - 12:50 AM.


cGeorge #7 Posted 11 February 2018 - 09:48 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 18652 battles
  • 2
  • [_ELF_] _ELF_
  • Member since:
    02-20-2013
In all maps, the destroyed tank is still suspended.

Attached Files

  • Attached File   Inkedshot_001_LI.jpg   3.77MB
  • Attached File   Inkedshot_002_LI.jpg   3.5MB


HekePrkl #8 Posted 11 February 2018 - 11:20 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 19125 battles
  • 33
  • [KOSTO] KOSTO
  • Member since:
    03-13-2014
The top-middle part is indeed way too flat. So much so that it seems and feels unrealistic and unfinished. Not sure how it's gameplay wise. Seems like it encourages a lot camping and no pushing where as previously it was fun to push the north.

_Anarchistic_ #9 Posted 14 March 2018 - 06:58 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 34798 battles
  • 1,027
  • [SKIL3] SKIL3
  • Member since:
    01-07-2015

bad rework of top field, far too flat and you can only camp at the back

 

a common theme developing here, camp camp camp

 

edit   having played this map many times now I am unable to think of a single positive comment bout the changes made to north field.  you cannot attack anywhere, every single lane you have to expose your entire tank, even Swedish tanks with 12 degrees gun depression cannot fire down on lower field safely.  the cover on bottom road on right west side field allows any tank to fire unspotted.  I have even pimped an M48 to 565m view range and still cannot spot a 468 version 4 firing from less than 200m

 

this map needs to be removed


Edited by _Anarchistic_, 19 March 2018 - 02:33 AM.






Also tagged with 1.0

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users