Jump to content


Remove 9.22 patch!


  • Please log in to reply
39 replies to this topic

Poll: 9.22 (121 members have cast votes)

You have to complete 250 battles in order to participate this poll.

Should 9.22 patch be removed and changes reverted?

  1. Yes!!! (66 votes [54.55%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 54.55%

  2. No (55 votes [45.45%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 45.45%

Vote Hide poll

Toni112007 #1 Posted 08 February 2018 - 01:50 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 9831 battles
  • 426
  • Member since:
    11-18-2013

Almost every vehicle WG introduced in this patch seems broken, so revert changes and remove all of those broken tanks immediately! (obj 268 4, obj 257 etc...)

 


Edited by Toni112007, 08 February 2018 - 01:52 PM.


_Sensation_ #2 Posted 08 February 2018 - 01:55 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 7185 battles
  • 582
  • [ORIGN] ORIGN
  • Member since:
    01-10-2017
*Edited

Edited by Nohe21, 08 February 2018 - 03:26 PM.
*Post edited by the moderation team due to disrespectful and non constructive comments.


Toni112007 #3 Posted 08 February 2018 - 02:03 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 9831 battles
  • 426
  • Member since:
    11-18-2013

View Post_Sensation_, on 08 February 2018 - 01:55 PM, said:

*Edited

 

*Edited

Edited by Nohe21, 08 February 2018 - 03:27 PM.
*Post edited by the moderation team due to disrespectful and non constructive comments.


mvdt #4 Posted 08 February 2018 - 02:04 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 39254 battles
  • 288
  • [FLEXR] FLEXR
  • Member since:
    05-10-2011
Only thing I think is unbalanced is the Obj. 268 4. Rest is alright in my opinion

ares354 #5 Posted 08 February 2018 - 02:13 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Beta Tester
  • 73803 battles
  • 3,222
  • Member since:
    12-05-2010

View Postmvdt, on 08 February 2018 - 02:04 PM, said:

Only thing I think is unbalanced is the Obj. 268 4. Rest is alright in my opinion

 

257 is not good for gameplay. New ruskie HT have no weakspots too. 

Shaade_Silentpaw #6 Posted 08 February 2018 - 02:16 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 22619 battles
  • 370
  • Member since:
    10-12-2015

Pointless thread.

It would have been far easier for them to just not release it, but they did -  despite all the opposition.

Now it's out, it's staying.



Toni112007 #7 Posted 08 February 2018 - 02:17 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 9831 battles
  • 426
  • Member since:
    11-18-2013

View Postares354, on 08 February 2018 - 02:13 PM, said:

 

257 is not good for gameplay. New ruskie HT have no weakspots too. 

 

705A is literally impossible to pen in sidescrape mode. OBJ 430U has heavy tank armor. I just saw guy yesterday casually going where heavy tanks go in 430U and he obliterated tier 9s there with ease.
 

View PostShaade_Silentpaw, on 08 February 2018 - 02:16 PM, said:

Pointless thread.

It would have been far easier for them to just not release it, but they did -  despite all the opposition.

Now it's out, it's staying.

 

Sad reacts only :(
 

mvdt #8 Posted 08 February 2018 - 02:18 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 39254 battles
  • 288
  • [FLEXR] FLEXR
  • Member since:
    05-10-2011

View Postares354, on 08 February 2018 - 02:13 PM, said:

 

257 is not good for gameplay. New ruskie HT have no weakspots too. 

 

It can be trollish yes. But in my opinion not game breaking.

Bucifel #9 Posted 08 February 2018 - 02:23 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 30932 battles
  • 1,373
  • [B4DD] B4DD
  • Member since:
    03-18-2013

View Postmvdt, on 08 February 2018 - 02:04 PM, said:

Only thing I think is unbalanced is the Obj. 268 4. Rest is alright in my opinion

 

sure...and 430u is FINE WITHOUT WEAKPOINTS ON TURRET, with BETTER hull than 113 ( YES, BETTER THAN A HEAVY! ) and no drawbacks compared with 121.

 

TOTALLY FINE AND BALANCED !

:facepalm:


Edited by Bucifel, 08 February 2018 - 02:23 PM.


mvdt #10 Posted 08 February 2018 - 02:28 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 39254 battles
  • 288
  • [FLEXR] FLEXR
  • Member since:
    05-10-2011

View PostBucifel, on 08 February 2018 - 02:23 PM, said:

 

sure...and 430u is FINE WITHOUT WEAKPOINTS ON TURRET, with BETTER hull than 113 ( YES, BETTER THAN A HEAVY! ) and no drawbacks compared with 121.

 

TOTALLY FINE AND BALANCED !

:facepalm:

 

You clearly can't read. Let me say it again.

Only thing I think is unbalanced is the Obj. 268 4. Rest is alright in my opinion



ihateclowns #11 Posted 08 February 2018 - 02:32 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 31151 battles
  • 238
  • [TROP] TROP
  • Member since:
    05-17-2012
I like this patch and I like the new tanks, there is always crying over every new patch, wahhhh the badger is op and broken, wahhhhh the sconqerer is op and broken, wahhhh the type 5 heavy is op and broken, wahhhh the Russian tanks are broken, you guys never give up. The obj 430u has easy auto pen lfp even for tier 8's long reload and is slow compared to other mediums. The 705A is the same with an auto pen lfp and is horribly slow with long reload and the obj 268v4 turns like the titanic and has terrible accuracy and two weakspots. 

unhappy_bunny #12 Posted 08 February 2018 - 02:32 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 18109 battles
  • 2,674
  • [-OC-] -OC-
  • Member since:
    08-01-2012

Dear OP

As you are so concerned about this patch and the problems you see with it, can I ask if you have bothered to provide constructive feedback to WG via the "current update" sub-forum?

 

Or is it easier to just open a whine thread on the general forum along with all the others?



vasilinhorulezz #13 Posted 08 February 2018 - 02:35 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 22813 battles
  • 1,109
  • Member since:
    09-26-2014

View PostBucifel, on 08 February 2018 - 02:23 PM, said:

 

sure...and 430u is FINE WITHOUT WEAKPOINTS ON TURRET, with BETTER hull than 113 ( YES, BETTER THAN A HEAVY! ) and no drawbacks compared with 121.

 

TOTALLY FINE AND BALANCED !

:facepalm:

 

Effective armor on UFP is 260 mm, so no, not better than a heavy,

although I think they should soften up the cupolas a bit.



Bucifel #14 Posted 08 February 2018 - 02:37 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 30932 battles
  • 1,373
  • [B4DD] B4DD
  • Member since:
    03-18-2013

View Postmvdt, on 08 February 2018 - 02:28 PM, said:

 

You clearly can't read. Let me say it again.

Only thing I think is unbalanced is the Obj. 268 4. Rest is alright in my opinion

and i said my opinion too

 

View Postihateclowns, on 08 February 2018 - 02:32 PM, said:

I like this patch and I like the new tanks, there is always crying over every new patch, wahhhh the badger is op and broken, wahhhhh the sconqerer is op and broken, wahhhh the type 5 heavy is op and broken, wahhhh the Russian tanks are broken, you guys never give up. The obj 430u has easy auto pen lfp even for tier 8's long reload and is slow compared to other mediums. The 705A is the same with an auto pen lfp and is horribly slow with long reload and the obj 268v4 turns like the titanic and has terrible accuracy and two weakspots. 

 

really?

Show me those 2 weakpoints for 268 4

 

RELEVANT ones, not weak only for gold !

 

View Postvasilinhorulezz, on 08 February 2018 - 02:35 PM, said:

 

Effective armor on UFP is 260 mm, so no, not better than a heavy,

although I think they should soften up the cupolas a bit.

 

i think we play different games then...

Spoiler

 


 

vasilinhorulezz #15 Posted 08 February 2018 - 02:41 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 22813 battles
  • 1,109
  • Member since:
    09-26-2014

257 side armor is trollish, although frontal armor is not really strong, also it has auto pen turret roof. It seems pretty strong, not sure if OP yet.

430U, the hatches should get nerfed a bit, now they are penable only with premium rounds (yea, it has powercreeped the 121, but this thing was powercreeped way before the introduction of the 430u).

705 and 705A, seem mostly useless to me unless they side-scrape.

268 v4 is completely broken.

My opinion so far, not sure, because it's the hype of new tanks,

so not really sure unless a significant amount of time has passed,

and people get used to fight them.

 

View PostBucifel, on 08 February 2018 - 02:41 PM, said:

 

i think we play different games then...

Spoiler

 

How is this better than this?


 
 

Or this?


 

Bucifel #16 Posted 08 February 2018 - 02:48 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 30932 battles
  • 1,373
  • [B4DD] B4DD
  • Member since:
    03-18-2013

View Postvasilinhorulezz, on 08 February 2018 - 02:45 PM, said:

How is this better than this?

 

you are really troglodyte or what?

Is E100 somehow simmilar with a medium or why yo ucompare 403u with SUPERHEAVYS??? :facepalm:

 

heavys wich became worse than mediums in almost any way are tanks like 113 and you can see above WHY.

you can see how a medium have better armor than a heavy today 

look if you missed somehow :

View PostBucifel, on 08 February 2018 - 02:41 PM, said:

 

i think we play different games then...

Spoiler

 

 

:facepalm:

Edited by Bucifel, 08 February 2018 - 02:49 PM.


vasilinhorulezz #17 Posted 08 February 2018 - 02:52 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 22813 battles
  • 1,109
  • Member since:
    09-26-2014

Still the same, also 113s playstyle doesn't differ much from mediums.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

BTW, I can do this all day.


Edited by vasilinhorulezz, 08 February 2018 - 02:53 PM.


Bucifel #18 Posted 08 February 2018 - 02:57 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 30932 battles
  • 1,373
  • [B4DD] B4DD
  • Member since:
    03-18-2013

View Postvasilinhorulezz, on 08 February 2018 - 02:52 PM, said:

Still the same, also 113s playstyle doesn't differ much from mediums.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

BTW, I can do this all day.

 

just put it on SAME angle and then compare it ;)

dont bother...i already did it...so just explain...why a medium is better armored than a heavy??

and i dont even talk about cupolas...:facepalm: but im sure you can see them on both tanks...

look again :

Posted Image

vs

Posted Image

 


Edited by Bucifel, 08 February 2018 - 03:00 PM.


Dava_117 #19 Posted 08 February 2018 - 02:59 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 19443 battles
  • 3,285
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    12-17-2014
I think it's a bit too late to remove 9.22. And it's a bit too early to say something about it. I need some days of testing...

DuncaN_101 #20 Posted 08 February 2018 - 02:59 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 53226 battles
  • 1,892
  • [-B-C-] -B-C-
  • Member since:
    07-29-2011
Voted for both options because I could




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users