Jump to content


Murazor


  • Please log in to reply
41 replies to this topic

kartoffelbaron #1 Posted 10 February 2018 - 01:36 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 46394 battles
  • 1,151
  • Member since:
    04-17-2014
What do you think about Murazor's work? Is he doing that well?
A streamer making important decisions? Does he even have the technical knowledge?


JocMeister #2 Posted 10 February 2018 - 01:39 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 22394 battles
  • 1,999
  • [-MM] -MM
  • Member since:
    08-03-2015

Since everyone is so damned happy with the current balance he is obviously doing great!

 

Maus, Swedish TDs, Types, 907s, Badgers, new Russian HTs/MTs....so well balanced and brings such enjoyment to the game! 



Sfinski #3 Posted 10 February 2018 - 01:43 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 31349 battles
  • 2,505
  • [-PJ-] -PJ-
  • Member since:
    09-26-2013
Murazor is like fast food for the game. Makes the game fatter and the longer he is part of the development the worse the game runs. Too long will lead to heart attack and termination. The 1.0 is like adding tons of makeup on a Hippo. It's still gonna be fat bad running mess, no matter what it looks like. 

gunslingerXXX #4 Posted 10 February 2018 - 01:46 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 10939 battles
  • 1,902
  • Member since:
    11-16-2014
Just a few more tanks to make OP and balance will be restored again.:trollface:

basin79 #5 Posted 10 February 2018 - 01:48 PM

    General

  • Player
  • 15351 battles
  • 8,681
  • Member since:
    03-13-2012
He's absolutely unless. More and more super armoured tanks requiring prem ammo to pen.

He's an idiot.

ZlatanArKung #6 Posted 10 February 2018 - 02:21 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 1529 battles
  • 5,112
  • Member since:
    12-20-2014
Murazor ans his decision in WoT is the reason to why I dont play and haven't supported the game economically for more then 1 year.

Dava_117 #7 Posted 10 February 2018 - 02:23 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 18955 battles
  • 3,082
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    12-17-2014
Don't like his concept of armour. Too much without skill involved and almost no weackspot. I miss SerB.

Jumping_TurtIe #8 Posted 10 February 2018 - 02:47 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 6170 battles
  • 899
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    02-26-2015
I said it a year ago that we will be wanting Storm & co back when they appointent Murozar as head balancing...

ZlatanArKung #9 Posted 10 February 2018 - 06:10 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 1529 battles
  • 5,112
  • Member since:
    12-20-2014

View PostJumping_TurtIe, on 10 February 2018 - 02:47 PM, said:

I said it a year ago that we will be wanting Storm & co back when they appointent Murozar as head balancing...

Storm and SerB might have been rude about stuff and assholes from time to time, but they did at least to a decent job in keeping the game balanced, or at least not brokingly unbalanced.



TheOneAboveAII #10 Posted 10 February 2018 - 06:32 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 13530 battles
  • 488
  • [S4LT] S4LT
  • Member since:
    07-14-2016

Oh boy...here we go...murazor...oh murazor...i wrote a poem to show how much I love him.

 

Hello there, Murazor

You know me, your enemy

I have started to adore

Killing people on the shore

How about we make a deal

I buy something from WoT store

And you come a little here

And I'll meet you on the shore

We can both go and hang out

And I will be smiling proud

While beating you to death

And the balance bringing back

And after you died

We can finally be quiet

As the game will once again be playable

And for everyone enjoyable

I like killing people on the shore

Especially, you, Murazor.

 



Pansenmann #11 Posted 10 February 2018 - 07:23 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 33891 battles
  • 12,495
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    08-17-2012

View PostZlatanArKung, on 10 February 2018 - 06:10 PM, said:

Storm and SerB might have been rude about stuff and assholes from time to time, but they did at least to a decent job in keeping the game balanced, or at least not brokingly unbalanced.

 

/sign



Aikl #12 Posted 10 February 2018 - 08:00 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 25213 battles
  • 4,331
  • [-MM] -MM
  • Member since:
    04-13-2011

View PostZlatanArKung, on 10 February 2018 - 05:10 PM, said:

Storm and SerB might have been rude about stuff and assholes from time to time, but they did at least to a decent job in keeping the game balanced, or at least not brokingly unbalanced.

 

From behind my rose-colured spectacles it was indeed not balanced, yet managed to keep the game kinda fun. Not entirely sure why. Of course, WoT anno 2014 lacked the likes of VK100.01P and Defender, but still had tanks like the WTE100 and Foch 155. 
More or less leaves the playerbase and the maps. The playerbase, well, doubt it changed to the worse. Maps were certainly different, however. Corridors, but with more options that enabled way more mobile gameplay - and not a single chokepoint on the heavy flank deciding virtually all map control.

 

(I reached ~12k battles during 2014; I refuse to believe that I hadn't played enough to get bored with the game if it wasn't fun.)



jimbobjammybob #13 Posted 10 February 2018 - 11:20 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 618 battles
  • 210
  • [TH1NK] TH1NK
  • Member since:
    12-28-2015

View PostZlatanArKung, on 10 February 2018 - 02:21 PM, said:

Murazor ans his decision in WoT is the reason to why I dont play and haven't supported the game economically for more then 1 year.

 

May I ask wtf you are doing here on the forums? You have the right ofc and who am I to ask I hear you say but really whats the point of being here? is life that dull?

Sebenza #14 Posted 11 February 2018 - 12:42 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 13652 battles
  • 1,046
  • Member since:
    03-19-2013

View Postjimbobjammybob, on 10 February 2018 - 11:20 PM, said:

 

May I ask wtf you are doing here on the forums? You have the right ofc and who am I to ask I hear you say but really whats the point of being here? is life that dull?

 

Maybe he remembers the game as it was a few years ago, when he still enjoyed it and could live with its faults at that time? Maybe he keeps an eye on things to see if there's any improvement over the last two years of completely bonkers decision making by WG? I really don't see why you should go "wtf" on folks that are still interested in the game but disappointed in the way it's evolving....

UrQuan #15 Posted 11 February 2018 - 12:54 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 19411 battles
  • 6,153
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    08-19-2011

View PostDava_117, on 10 February 2018 - 02:23 PM, said:

Don't like his concept of armour. Too much without skill involved and almost no weackspot. I miss SerB.

 

Same, seems to be about minimizing armor skill & ruining non HT classes. The latest armored tanks get so much advantages stacked on top of their armor. Good armor is a powerful advantage, no need to add a powerful gun and/or powerful viewrange on top of it...

 

View PostZlatanArKung, on 10 February 2018 - 06:10 PM, said:

Storm and SerB might have been rude about stuff and assholes from time to time, but they did at least to a decent job in keeping the game balanced, or at least not brokingly unbalanced.

 

They had some brokenly balanced tanks, but at least none of them were idiot proof & skill still mattered against them. Yes; Hellcat & KV-1S were blatantly OP, but at the same time, if they made an error playing them, you could at least hurt them. No feelings of helplessness against them.

T29 & IS-3 were the kings of their tiers, but at least there were ways in handling them & they weren't shell-proof against lower tiers.

And very well armored tanks like KV-4 & Maus had some serious drawbacks, especially with their gun(handling), as it should be: good armor must be payed for in other ways then just mobility alone.



Strizi #16 Posted 11 February 2018 - 12:58 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 35460 battles
  • 596
  • Member since:
    06-16-2011
I cannot use words to describe what i think about him but i can tell in numbers. 0/10.

jimbobjammybob #17 Posted 11 February 2018 - 01:32 AM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 618 battles
  • 210
  • [TH1NK] TH1NK
  • Member since:
    12-28-2015

View PostSebenza, on 11 February 2018 - 12:42 AM, said:

 

Maybe he remembers the game as it was a few years ago, when he still enjoyed it and could live with its faults at that time? Maybe he keeps an eye on things to see if there's any improvement over the last two years of completely bonkers decision making by WG? I really don't see why you should go "wtf" on folks that are still interested in the game but disappointed in the way it's evolving....

 

Thank you for joining in ( no sarcasm). But I really feel the person the question was directed at should answer. Guessing and assumptions etc.

 

My wtf is not what it might seem, merely a liberal use of language no offense is meant by my use of it.



ZlatanArKung #18 Posted 11 February 2018 - 07:59 AM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 1529 battles
  • 5,112
  • Member since:
    12-20-2014

View PostUrQuan, on 11 February 2018 - 12:54 AM, said:

 

Same, seems to be about minimizing armor skill & ruining non HT classes. The latest armored tanks get so much advantages stacked on top of their armor. Good armor is a powerful advantage, no need to add a powerful gun and/or powerful viewrange on top of it...

 

 

They had some brokenly balanced tanks, but at least none of them were idiot proof & skill still mattered against them. Yes; Hellcat & KV-1S were blatantly OP, but at the same time, if they made an error playing them, you could at least hurt them. No feelings of helplessness against them.

T29 & IS-3 were the kings of their tiers, but at least there were ways in handling them & they weren't shell-proof against lower tiers.

And very well armored tanks like KV-4 & Maus had some serious drawbacks, especially with their gun(handling), as it should be: good armor must be payed for in other ways then just mobility alone.

They also nerfed KV-1S and Hellcat (SerB and Storm).



UrQuan #19 Posted 11 February 2018 - 09:31 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 19411 battles
  • 6,153
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    08-19-2011

View PostZlatanArKung, on 11 February 2018 - 07:59 AM, said:

They also nerfed KV-1S and Hellcat (SerB and Storm).

 

Correct, they did take their sweet time, but in the end, it did happen.

vasilinhorulezz #20 Posted 11 February 2018 - 10:06 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 22794 battles
  • 1,097
  • Member since:
    09-26-2014
When you bounce off a badly angled Maus's side, you know how well the balance team works.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users