Jump to content


Obj 777 v2 after t10?


  • Please log in to reply
22 replies to this topic

hasnainrakha57 #1 Posted 10 February 2018 - 02:15 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 13824 battles
  • 583
  • [WFTTE] WFTTE
  • Member since:
    08-01-2013
Somehow both tank resembles a lot that gun,hull armor weak somehow little weak.Power to weight ratio and speed.Check it on tank gg what u guys think?

MeNoobTank #2 Posted 10 February 2018 - 02:21 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 11427 battles
  • 384
  • [R3L4X] R3L4X
  • Member since:
    02-16-2017
I think is a little too weak to be after the T-10. Also I don't really like it's looks :P

hasnainrakha57 #3 Posted 10 February 2018 - 02:46 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 13824 battles
  • 583
  • [WFTTE] WFTTE
  • Member since:
    08-01-2013

View PostMeNoobTank, on 10 February 2018 - 01:21 PM, said:

I think is a little too weak to be after the T-10. Also I don't really like it's looks :P

Vodka + engineer=weird looks!



DarkPacifist #4 Posted 10 February 2018 - 03:01 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 26933 battles
  • 182
  • [CR0WS] CR0WS
  • Member since:
    08-05-2013
Engineers don't have a lot of skills in design, so vodka + engineer=weirder looks

Ricky_Rolls #5 Posted 10 February 2018 - 05:25 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Beta Tester
  • 66954 battles
  • 1,330
  • Member since:
    11-10-2010
Seems a lil bit too obvious for me, we'll see.

Afdass #6 Posted 11 February 2018 - 12:03 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 12980 battles
  • 633
  • Member since:
    07-26-2016
Won't be the 777 v2 because it just doesn't fit the line concept. And someone from WG said they are working in a new tier 10 tank to put after the T-10, which suggests that will be a complete new tank, and not one already in the game.

xx984 #7 Posted 11 February 2018 - 12:16 AM

    Major

  • Player
  • 54885 battles
  • 2,506
  • [GO-IN] GO-IN
  • Member since:
    08-11-2013

View PostAfdass, on 10 February 2018 - 11:03 PM, said:

Won't be the 777 v2 because it just doesn't fit the line concept. And someone from WG said they are working in a new tier 10 tank to put after the T-10, which suggests that will be a complete new tank, and not one already in the game.

 

does it matter if it fits the line concept? Afterall they just added a 257, a tank with a V Shaped hull, in the middle of a regular heavy line, Both the IS-3 and IS-7 have nothing like that and it doesnt fit at all

Afdass #8 Posted 11 February 2018 - 12:34 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 12980 battles
  • 633
  • Member since:
    07-26-2016

View Postxx984, on 10 February 2018 - 11:16 PM, said:

 

does it matter if it fits the line concept? Afterall they just added a 257, a tank with a V Shaped hull, in the middle of a regular heavy line, Both the IS-3 and IS-7 have nothing like that and it doesnt fit at all

 

At least has its similarities: Pike nose, black hole side armor, good reverse sidescrapers. The 257 was just a poor introduced idea...

xx984 #9 Posted 11 February 2018 - 12:43 AM

    Major

  • Player
  • 54885 battles
  • 2,506
  • [GO-IN] GO-IN
  • Member since:
    08-11-2013

View PostAfdass, on 10 February 2018 - 11:34 PM, said:

 

At least has its similarities: Pike nose, black hole side armor, good reverse sidescrapers. The 257 was just a poor introduced idea...

 

But the 777 has similarities to the T-10? 

Afdass #10 Posted 11 February 2018 - 01:38 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 12980 battles
  • 633
  • Member since:
    07-26-2016

View Postxx984, on 10 February 2018 - 11:43 PM, said:

 

But the 777 has similarities to the T-10? 

 

View PostAfdass, on 10 February 2018 - 11:03 PM, said:

Won't be the 777 v2 because it just doesn't fit the line concept.

 



KillingJoker #11 Posted 11 February 2018 - 01:42 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 33316 battles
  • 1,392
  • [-EXC-] -EXC-
  • Member since:
    09-07-2015

according to tanks.gg the only similarity is the turret and the gun...

 

https://tanks.gg/tan...0&k=0&vm=visual

 

the hull shape and turret positionmakes it very different in play style compared to the T10...

way more similar to obj 430 U, specialy in gun handling and aimtime for a big alpha gun.



Afdass #12 Posted 11 February 2018 - 01:58 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 12980 battles
  • 633
  • Member since:
    07-26-2016

Upcoming Soviet Tier 10 Medium and Heavy

Btw...


Edited by Afdass, 11 February 2018 - 01:59 AM.


xx984 #13 Posted 11 February 2018 - 02:35 AM

    Major

  • Player
  • 54885 battles
  • 2,506
  • [GO-IN] GO-IN
  • Member since:
    08-11-2013

View PostAfdass, on 11 February 2018 - 12:38 AM, said:

 

 

 

but it does fit the line?

hasnainrakha57 #14 Posted 11 February 2018 - 10:45 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 13824 battles
  • 583
  • [WFTTE] WFTTE
  • Member since:
    08-01-2013

View PostKillingJoker, on 11 February 2018 - 12:42 AM, said:

according to tanks.gg the only similarity is the turret and the gun...

 

https://tanks.gg/tan...0&k=0&vm=visual

 

the hull shape and turret positionmakes it very different in play style compared to the T10...

way more similar to obj 430 U, specialy in gun handling and aimtime for a big alpha gun.

Hull armor is also 200-280 similiar to t10



KillingJoker #15 Posted 11 February 2018 - 11:24 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 33316 battles
  • 1,392
  • [-EXC-] -EXC-
  • Member since:
    09-07-2015

View Posthasnainrakha57, on 11 February 2018 - 10:45 AM, said:

Hull armor is also 200-280 similiar to t10

 

similar? how can you say its similar, its completely different, its not pike nose hull, its a flat frontal hull with a turret in center

 

the way you play the tank, in corners, in slopes is completely different from the T10, the hull design makes the playability of the tank a lot more the 113, and the 430 U

than IS-7, IS-3, or T-10 style of play....

 

Because with that hull, you can actually sidescrape, you can angle the tank, things you dont do with the T-10 or any other pike nose tank

so despite the tank have the same turret and gun, i dont thing its a good idea to place it after the T-10, and i dont think they will do that...  i am expecting them to release

a 111-5A clone, a very mobile machine with punchy gun and good turret

 


Edited by KillingJoker, 11 February 2018 - 11:25 AM.


RamRaid90 #16 Posted 11 February 2018 - 11:32 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 21412 battles
  • 6,465
  • [D0NG] D0NG
  • Member since:
    12-14-2014
Seems like that will be a CW reward tank, or maybe a reward from some new campaigns?

Edited by RamRaid90, 11 February 2018 - 11:32 AM.


KillingJoker #17 Posted 11 February 2018 - 11:36 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 33316 battles
  • 1,392
  • [-EXC-] -EXC-
  • Member since:
    09-07-2015

View PostRamRaid90, on 11 February 2018 - 11:32 AM, said:

Seems like that will be a CW reward tank, or maybe a reward from some new campaigns?

 

It would make sense

 

per example if they replaced the obj 260 campain for the 777, and placed the 260 as tier 10 after the T-10 tank, since the obj 260 is aparently more mobile than the IS-7, and even have the same gun. 

 

but honestly i dont know what they will do.... i only know that the obj 777 doesnt have any characteristics to make its playability function in the T-10 techtreee 


Edited by KillingJoker, 11 February 2018 - 11:37 AM.


RamRaid90 #18 Posted 11 February 2018 - 11:41 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 21412 battles
  • 6,465
  • [D0NG] D0NG
  • Member since:
    12-14-2014

View PostKillingJoker, on 11 February 2018 - 10:36 AM, said:

 

It would make sense

 

per example if they replaced the obj 260 campain for the 777, and placed the 260 as tier 10 after the T-10 tank, since the obj 260 is aparently more mobile than the IS-7, and even have the same gun. 

 

but honestly i dont know what they will do.... i only know that the obj 777 doesnt have any characteristics to make its playability function in the T-10 techtreee 

 

Meh i'm not holding out much for the Tier X personally.

 

I'm just expecting themto clone the IS-7, nerf it's gun and side armour, and rename it the T-10M...



leggasiini #19 Posted 11 February 2018 - 06:58 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 14130 battles
  • 6,191
  • [-GLO-] -GLO-
  • Member since:
    12-01-2012

The Object 277/278. This thing would be more than logical after the T-10. It's literally a bigger and badder version of the T-10.

 

However, I wouldn't be surprised if they used the Object 777 II as tier 10 after the T-10 solely for their laziness, as the tank is already modeled. The tank looks cool when it comes to it's design, but it really doesn't fit there after the T-10.



DuncaN_101 #20 Posted 11 February 2018 - 07:04 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 53219 battles
  • 1,891
  • [-B-C-] -B-C-
  • Member since:
    07-29-2011

View Postxx984, on 11 February 2018 - 12:16 AM, said:

 

does it matter if it fits the line concept? Afterall they just added a 257, a tank with a V Shaped hull, in the middle of a regular heavy line, Both the IS-3 and IS-7 have nothing like that and it doesnt fit at all

Both tht is3 and the is7 have their side armour bent outwards tho so not a v but not straight like the is4 either.

 






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users