Jump to content


ATGM

Malyutka Konkurs BGM-71 MBDA Eryx HOT HJ-8 git balensd

  • Please log in to reply
20 replies to this topic

WindSplitter1 #1 Posted 13 February 2018 - 10:30 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 14279 battles
  • 1,716
  • Member since:
    02-07-2016

Special vehicles.

Should go without saying that there are plenty of pririties as of this moment. I don't think anyone thinks WoT is ready for ATGM armed Tank Destroyers/Missile Carriers.

 

https://thearmoredpa...nk-day-2017-qa/

 

Spoiler

 



Steve8066 #2 Posted 13 February 2018 - 10:33 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 9578 battles
  • 543
  • Member since:
    10-06-2015
after having put up with these in WT, i can say a resoundfing no to any idea of including ATGMs in tthe game. ANY inclusion of these will be detrimental to the game. If you thought there was a shitsotorm over arty, you aint seen nothing yet if they release these.

K_A #3 Posted 13 February 2018 - 10:36 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 13566 battles
  • 4,656
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    04-18-2013

Block Quote

 Some time ago Sergey Burkatovskiy (aka SerB) was confounded by introducing a one-tier spread in MM. Now it’s clear that introducing preferential matchmaking was a mistake. There are problems with some of those vehicles, but we’re readying them for a rebalance. Perhaps with some tanks, which will be unfit for rebalancing, we’ll propose a buyback.

 

Oh please yes let me get a buyback from the JT8.8 and FCM! That's like 6 months of premium I'd get for those two:B



Chipmunk_of_Vengeance #4 Posted 13 February 2018 - 10:36 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 1196 battles
  • 10,117
  • [BC28] BC28
  • Member since:
    05-20-2011

£10 says we'd get the Object 757 first for ATGM tanks

 



K_A #5 Posted 13 February 2018 - 10:39 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 13566 battles
  • 4,656
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    04-18-2013
I'd like a special event game mode with Sheridan derps with ATGM's, could be really fun :P

AliceUnchained #6 Posted 13 February 2018 - 10:48 PM

    General

  • Player
  • 37820 battles
  • 8,520
  • [322] 322
  • Member since:
    10-18-2011
It's a Q&A from September 2017; are you going to create a thread for each item on that list?

Chipmunk_of_Vengeance #7 Posted 13 February 2018 - 10:48 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 1196 battles
  • 10,117
  • [BC28] BC28
  • Member since:
    05-20-2011
Talking of removing the Pref MM and rebalancing vehicles, hopefully that means the T26E4 will finally get its second plate of spaced armour back and its historical engine :P

Balc0ra #8 Posted 13 February 2018 - 11:01 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 62749 battles
  • 14,373
  • [WALL] WALL
  • Member since:
    07-10-2012

View PostChipmunk_of_Vengeance, on 13 February 2018 - 10:48 PM, said:

Talking of removing the Pref MM and rebalancing vehicles, hopefully that means the T26E4 will finally get its second plate of spaced armour back and its historical engine :P

 

2nd plate has been back for ages. It was only a part of the lower plate when they "nerfed" it. The second they buffed it, it was back again. Just look at tank.gg. It has 2 plates of 38mm on the hull now. It used to have one. And they made the lower hull 139.6 mm instead... because reasons.

Chipmunk_of_Vengeance #9 Posted 13 February 2018 - 11:04 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 1196 battles
  • 10,117
  • [BC28] BC28
  • Member since:
    05-20-2011

View PostBalc0ra, on 13 February 2018 - 10:01 PM, said:

 

2nd plate has been back for ages. It was only a part of the lower plate when they "nerfed" it. The second they buffed it, it was back again. Just look at tank.gg. It has 2 plates of 38mm on the hull now. It used to have one. And they made the lower hull 139.6 mm instead... because reasons.

 

They did? Sweet, they just need to buff the engine then, perhaps also the gun to the T15E2 which used 2 piece ammo instead of one piece ammo of the T15E1.

AliceUnchained #10 Posted 13 February 2018 - 11:11 PM

    General

  • Player
  • 37820 battles
  • 8,520
  • [322] 322
  • Member since:
    10-18-2011

View PostChipmunk_of_Vengeance, on 13 February 2018 - 11:04 PM, said:

They did? Sweet, they just need to buff the engine then, perhaps also the gun to the T15E2 which used 2 piece ammo instead of one piece ammo of the T15E1.

 

Sure, and let's lower the reload speed then...



Chipmunk_of_Vengeance #11 Posted 13 February 2018 - 11:11 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 1196 battles
  • 10,117
  • [BC28] BC28
  • Member since:
    05-20-2011

View PostAliceUnchained, on 13 February 2018 - 10:11 PM, said:

 

Sure, and let's lower the reload speed then...

 

and remove the spaced armour and you got the perfect Tier 7 premium :D

Chipmunk_of_Vengeance #12 Posted 13 February 2018 - 11:26 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 1196 battles
  • 10,117
  • [BC28] BC28
  • Member since:
    05-20-2011
On a serious note there is one vehicle that I would nerf the front hull armour of and down tier, that being the M6A2E1 as I've yet to find a pic of it with that sloped front armour.

xx984 #13 Posted 13 February 2018 - 11:33 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 50828 battles
  • 2,065
  • [GO-IN] GO-IN
  • Member since:
    08-11-2013

View PostChipmunk_of_Vengeance, on 13 February 2018 - 10:26 PM, said:

On a serious note there is one vehicle that I would nerf the front hull armour of and down tier, that being the M6A2E1 as I've yet to find a pic of it with that sloped front armour.

 

Get your dirty little hands off my Mutant! :izmena:

Chipmunk_of_Vengeance #14 Posted 13 February 2018 - 11:47 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 1196 battles
  • 10,117
  • [BC28] BC28
  • Member since:
    05-20-2011

View Postxx984, on 13 February 2018 - 10:33 PM, said:

 

Get your dirty little hands off my Mutant! :izmena:

 



Element6_TheSprout #15 Posted 14 February 2018 - 10:14 AM

    General

  • Player
  • 28075 battles
  • 9,653
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    01-06-2013

Gimme...

 



WindSplitter1 #16 Posted 14 February 2018 - 10:04 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 14279 battles
  • 1,716
  • Member since:
    02-07-2016

View PostElement6_TheSprout, on 14 February 2018 - 09:14 AM, said:

Gimme...

 

 

Which vehicle is this? Looks like the T-100LT, even more "pancake-ized"

 

View PostAliceUnchained, on 13 February 2018 - 09:48 PM, said:

It's a Q&A from September 2017; are you going to create a thread for each item on that list?

 

No. I just happened to miss it. :)



Element6_TheSprout #17 Posted 14 February 2018 - 10:11 PM

    General

  • Player
  • 28075 battles
  • 9,653
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    01-06-2013

View PostWindSplitter1, on 14 February 2018 - 10:04 PM, said:

Which vehicle is this? Looks like the T-100LT, even more "pancake-ized"

It's an Object 775. I'm just a sucker for odd looking tanks :)



Spek_en_Bonen #18 Posted 15 February 2018 - 10:10 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Beta Tester
  • 31489 battles
  • 6,807
  • Member since:
    07-27-2010

1st operational Soviet tank with ATGM's was the T64B.  ~1976

We definitely need moar fantasy tanks (so tanks from before the T64B (with the smoothbore gun)) with an unusable/never operational weapon.

Gud idea.

 

Let's see if WG will lissun this time...

 

 

 

 

 

 



Element6_TheSprout #19 Posted 15 February 2018 - 10:26 AM

    General

  • Player
  • 28075 battles
  • 9,653
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    01-06-2013

View PostSpek_en_Bonen, on 15 February 2018 - 10:10 AM, said:

1st operational Soviet tank with ATGM's was the T64B.  ~1976

We definitely need moar fantasy tanks (so tanks from before the T64B (with the smoothbore gun)) with an unusable/never operational weapon.

Gud idea.

 

Let's see if WG will lissun this time...

Fantasy tanks as in what capacity?

 

We have Leopard 1 which was not a fantasy tank, but introduced in 1965. The Object 775 was an experimental tank from 1964, which did not enter service for more reasons than the low reliability of the guidance system, meaning it actually worked but not to standards required. Is year of introduction an issue? Tanks like the 775 could very well have become operational if the guidance system was the only issue, and not poor overview of the battlefield etc. on top of it.

 

If this game only had operational content, a huge number of players would have researched close to 100% of the game a long time ago. I bet for a lot of players that would not give them an incentive to stick around for years.



Spek_en_Bonen #20 Posted 15 February 2018 - 12:05 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Beta Tester
  • 31489 battles
  • 6,807
  • Member since:
    07-27-2010

View PostElement6_TheSprout, on 15 February 2018 - 10:26 AM, said:

Fantasy tanks as in what capacity?

 

We have Leopard 1 which was not a fantasy tank, but introduced in 1965. The Object 775 was an experimental tank from 1964, which did not enter service for more reasons than the low reliability of the guidance system, meaning it actually worked but not to standards required. Is year of introduction an issue? Tanks like the 775 could very well have become operational if the guidance system was the only issue, and not poor overview of the battlefield etc. on top of it.

 

If this game only had operational content, a huge number of players would have researched close to 100% of the game a long time ago. I bet for a lot of players that would not give them an incentive to stick around for years.

 

Fantasy tanks, like ones with "ATGM's" which were not functional.

They didn't pass the research phase of the project.

 

 

https://web.archive....ket/roket1.html

 

In Russian. Moslty failures up to 1976 (according to that Russian info)

 

You can use Google translate.


Edited by Spek_en_Bonen, 15 February 2018 - 12:06 PM.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users