Jump to content


9.22 Tanks Winrate


  • Please log in to reply
9 replies to this topic

ToodlePips #1 Posted 15 February 2018 - 09:44 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 55291 battles
  • 393
  • Member since:
    07-11-2012

Just out of interest I had a look at vbaddict today to check the new Russian tanks' winrates. Here goes (15 Feb, 9.45 pm CEST):

 

  • Object 705                54.59 %
  • Object 705A              53.01 %
  • Object 430U              54.39 %
  • Object 430                 56.81 %
  • Object 268 Version 4 55.81 %
  • Object 257                 50.06 %

 

And here some widely played Tier X tanks for comparison (picked quite randomly):

 

  • Leopard 1                  47.94 %
  • AMX 30 B                  48.35 %
  • STB-1                        50.27 %  
  • E 100                        48.47 %
  • E 50 Ausf. M             49.17 %
  • IS-7                           48.75 %
  • M48A5 Patton           51.10 %
  • Jagdpanzer E 100     50.23 %

 

@ Wargaming: Do the new tanks' stats look healthy to you? Because with the exception of the 257, they sure as hell don't look healthy to me.


Edited by ToodlePips, 15 February 2018 - 09:46 PM.


Steve8066 #2 Posted 15 February 2018 - 09:53 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 11170 battles
  • 725
  • Member since:
    10-06-2015
`hmm i agree they dont look healthy. We must buff the IS-7 as it is letting us down`

HugSeal #3 Posted 15 February 2018 - 09:56 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 22717 battles
  • 2,010
  • [SWEC] SWEC
  • Member since:
    05-10-2012

I would think that stats gathered by a small part of the playerbase on tanks not owned by much of the playerbase that people don't know how to damage yet may be a tad skewed and perhaps not entirely reliable. I base this on tehfact that pretty much every new tank tends to overperform the first months.

 

Not saying none of them are broken op though.


Edited by HugSeal, 15 February 2018 - 09:56 PM.


Beltalowda #4 Posted 15 February 2018 - 10:06 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 60216 battles
  • 685
  • Member since:
    03-02-2011
Russian tanks, what do you expect they have to outperform the rest. 

Balc0ra #5 Posted 15 February 2018 - 10:11 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 64344 battles
  • 15,409
  • [WALL] WALL
  • Member since:
    07-10-2012

705 line is free xped by mostly good players. Not many tomatoes sit around with enough to skip that or have done the IS-M yet. As that tank is sitting on a 50% WR. Both the tier 9 and X 705 have less then 2000 each on EU on the last update in terms of population.

 

The TD line was the least popular one for a long time, so was the 430 line from tier 9 and up. As the old 263 did not even have a population of 40K on EU. New TD is not even at 20K. So it's not like tomatoes have swarmed to those yet either vs your "randomly picked" tier X's that most tomatoes had years to drag down as is. As there are close to half a million IS-7 on EU to name one. How do you think the tomato vs unicorn ratio is on that vs the 705A? That and line changes attracts players back to the lines. Good players more so then not.

 

257 stats are easy to explain. Because most tomatoes already had a T-10 as it was a fairly popular tank. So they got this as well, and thus enough bad players have had access to it to "drag" it down already.

 

If it remains as high after a 2-3 months. Then sure. But this early? We see it each patch to panic about it yet. Badger and Foch B was the same after 14 days sitting at close to 58% iirc. Now they are both at 50% after more bad players get around to them. 


Edited by Balc0ra, 15 February 2018 - 10:20 PM.


ToodlePips #6 Posted 15 February 2018 - 10:32 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 55291 battles
  • 393
  • Member since:
    07-11-2012
@ Balcora: Fair point. Perhaps it is too early to judge. Still, I must say that based on my experience in the game so far and from what I've seen by various CC's I'm sceptical. Time will tell.

Edited by ToodlePips, 15 February 2018 - 10:33 PM.


Avtonom #7 Posted 15 February 2018 - 10:34 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 32127 battles
  • 137
  • [HAMI] HAMI
  • Member since:
    02-27-2014
its too early to make conclusions: good players were the first to grab those tanks, hence the winrate statistics

Strizi #8 Posted 15 February 2018 - 10:47 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 34594 battles
  • 593
  • Member since:
    06-16-2011
I sadly expect most of these winrates to stay above average because RASHAAAA.

Edited by Strizi, 15 February 2018 - 10:48 PM.


Beltalowda #9 Posted 15 February 2018 - 11:01 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 60216 battles
  • 685
  • Member since:
    03-02-2011

Three are two main problems for me in this patch :

  1.  Why does Object 268 Version 4 have to be that fast and with a such good reverse speed ? When it has all the bloody armour and 907 gun handling.
  2.  Why does Object 430U have to have such a great camo ability when it has everything else on the top of it ?

I also dislike V-Shaped hull design, it should not be in the game, we've seen T-22, we have buffed 907 and now we have another one. Who is the one to blame for all of this ? Maybe it's us players/paying customers, people are buying OP stuff in the premium shop hence giving WG confirmation that ppl are ok with it. 

 

This game is how old, 8 years or so and how many times  have we seen players sticking together for something they all disliked ? Once maybe with the Foch drama. It worked in EVE online when players were truly fed up with stuff CCP were trying to introduce, sadly it does not work here.



HaZardeur #10 Posted 15 February 2018 - 11:23 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Beta Tester
  • 33257 battles
  • 1,159
  • Member since:
    08-14-2010
IS7 nearly gets outperformed by the Leopard 1..... buff incoming.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users