Jump to content


Player with the lowest score.


  • Please log in to reply
61 replies to this topic

Procjon #1 Posted 17 February 2018 - 12:09 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 55506 battles
  • 509
  • Member since:
    09-08-2011

I would like to see if anybody found a player with personal score of less than the guy i found in my battle.

 

Only 2 requirements:

  • THE PLAYER must have over 10.000 games played so we don't judge newbies and we look for real noooobs.
  • THE PLAYER must be in the battle you played.

 

No names please. Best if you have print screens to prove it.

 

Boob.png

 

hf

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Shivva #2 Posted 17 February 2018 - 12:26 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 29800 battles
  • 1,958
  • [J_A_G] J_A_G
  • Member since:
    05-20-2012

Breaking news...there are bad players in WoT......

 

More to follow in our 10 o'clock bulletin.



Procjon #3 Posted 17 February 2018 - 12:46 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 55506 battles
  • 509
  • Member since:
    09-08-2011

View PostShivva, on 16 February 2018 - 11:26 PM, said:

Breaking news...there are bad players in WoT......

 

More to follow in our 10 o'clock bulletin.

 

I love your awesome reply to the matter of this thread and your understanding what was asked in this topic.

 

hf

 



Cannes76 #4 Posted 17 February 2018 - 12:58 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 66590 battles
  • 1,731
  • Member since:
    04-16-2011
A 45% is the best you can do? It's like you're not even trying...

dimethylcadmium #5 Posted 17 February 2018 - 01:09 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 6233 battles
  • 770
  • [WGL-A] WGL-A
  • Member since:
    11-24-2017

I know one! It's-a-me, Mario! Grinding the stock WZ-131 with a terribad crew. 25 battles, 40% winrate.

 

 



apaleytos #6 Posted 17 February 2018 - 01:42 AM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 15166 battles
  • 197
  • Member since:
    06-26-2012

I was in battle today there was a guy with 8k battles and 50(yes 50) wn8 ,41% WR .Thought he was bot but he tried to play.People cant play or just dont care(or both like me).In a battle last night,there was a bluenicum in his 1390.He could flanked a t8 TD in prohorovka from Line1 at the end and practically farm remaining tanks/win the game.I ask him why not,he says" Mate i cant even shoot properly,had 6 beers" :trollface:.

 

P.S : No he wasn't the famous streamer Fosco...


Edited by apaleytos, 17 February 2018 - 01:45 AM.


Procjon #7 Posted 17 February 2018 - 05:38 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 55506 battles
  • 509
  • Member since:
    09-08-2011

View PostCannes76, on 16 February 2018 - 11:58 PM, said:

A 45% is the best you can do? It's like you're not even trying...

 

Not sure if 45% was about me as i have different number but if yes i just wanted to add i play 100% at work so if you play at work you understand my point.

 

hf



jabster #8 Posted 17 February 2018 - 05:43 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 12537 battles
  • 23,417
  • [WSAT] WSAT
  • Member since:
    12-30-2010

View PostProcjon, on 17 February 2018 - 04:38 AM, said:

 

Not sure if 45% was about me as i have different number but if yes i just wanted to add i play 100% at work so if you play at work you understand my point.

 

hf

 

Why are you looking at win-rates as a measure of how bad a player is when you think that the game is rigged. According to you it’s entirely possibly that they’re actually a better player than you?

TheFurst #9 Posted 17 February 2018 - 05:50 AM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 12722 battles
  • 162
  • [HD16] HD16
  • Member since:
    01-04-2015

I wonder if forum threads say anything about ones personality.

 

Is it possible to give this thread a MAGA hat?


Edited by TheFurst, 17 February 2018 - 05:51 AM.


Martijn_mk2 #10 Posted 17 February 2018 - 06:55 AM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 5840 battles
  • 291
  • Member since:
    03-19-2013

I had this guy in one of my battles once..


Edited.

He has amazing dmg per battle in his tanks.
34-85m 1k battles 159dmg average
IS 500 battles 197dmg
Kv85 440 battles 132 dmg

It goes on and on :P


Edited by Asklepi0s, 18 February 2018 - 11:45 AM.
This post has been edited by the moderation team due to Naming and Shaming


UrQuan #11 Posted 17 February 2018 - 07:17 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 19467 battles
  • 6,185
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    08-19-2011

Eh, 45% is nothing. It's bad yes, but not mind-boggling bad. Talk 40% and we're starting to get somewhere into the realm of *Why? How? This can't possibly be real?*

 

Worst I've seen was actually a platoon in action, their very bad play grabbed our attention, their stats linked to me by a fellow forumite. WR in their 30's (36% I think, not sure tho) & 29% WR in their TX tanks. The Unicums of bad plays. The Avatars of atrocious play. Play so bad, it makes a 45% player look like he has godlike playerskill. Never seen worse tbh. No screenshot, I didn't want to taint my PC with this witchery of evil skill.

 

Honestly, the difference in skill between someone in very low 40% & 45% WR is rather large. The 45% player still can do some stuff, just lacking in skills, but at least he can hurt something in easy situations. 40% is just; *Cannot save himself from any situation, not even when two tiers advantage on enemy in a spot that benefits the tank'* type of players.


Edited by UrQuan, 17 February 2018 - 07:23 AM.


OIias_of_Sunhillow #12 Posted 17 February 2018 - 07:23 AM

    Major

  • Player
  • 24554 battles
  • 2,552
  • Member since:
    07-20-2011

I'm sure I've seen a 37%er, along the way.

The dent in my desk where my jaw hit it is still there.



wsatnutter #13 Posted 17 February 2018 - 07:34 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Beta Tester
  • 24957 battles
  • 7,589
  • [WSAT] WSAT
  • Member since:
    08-25-2010
OP you have too much time on your hands.

Pansenmann #14 Posted 17 February 2018 - 07:53 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 34110 battles
  • 12,637
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    08-17-2012

you should see my stats in the AMX 30 prototype...

 

:hiding:

 

but does this really need to be in "gameplay discussion"?



250swb #15 Posted 17 February 2018 - 08:55 AM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 22667 battles
  • 5,065
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    09-23-2015
This is a pretty distasteful thread, it's one thing calling out bad players in the context looking at what can be done to improve play, but just to point fingers and sneer is the sort of thing children do.

TheWarrener #16 Posted 17 February 2018 - 09:34 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 3406 battles
  • 355
  • Member since:
    10-31-2017
Met a glorious 46%er yesterday who lost us the battle and messaged me after, generally butthurting. He ended his diarrhea stream with "Why would I want to become a better player?"

Martijn_mk2 #17 Posted 17 February 2018 - 09:40 AM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 5840 battles
  • 291
  • Member since:
    03-19-2013
But dont you think its interesting in a way?
45% oke i get it, you are just not good at the game, AT ALL.
But 37%, how is that even possible?

kejmo #18 Posted 17 February 2018 - 09:46 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 29035 battles
  • 717
  • Member since:
    11-07-2011

Well i'd say that probably 95% of the playerbase is like that. 

 

From 20 matches :

 

15 are solved with 95% of your team dead in under 1minute, 

3 matches are solved with 75% of your team dead in 2 minutes, 

1 match is a good match that lasts and no matter the outcome, the game was good, 

1 match is solved with your team winning in 2 minutes. 

 

So basically nothing changed. No matter what you do you just keep losing, 

 

 



jdc302 #19 Posted 17 February 2018 - 10:00 AM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 14935 battles
  • 77
  • Member since:
    07-09-2011

Edited.


Edited by Asklepi0s, 18 February 2018 - 11:43 AM.
This post has been edited by the moderation team due to Naming and Shaming


Noo_Noo #20 Posted 17 February 2018 - 10:09 AM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 21651 battles
  • 2,048
  • Member since:
    05-05-2013

Personally I think this is out of order.






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users