Jump to content


5 maps are getting removed in 1.0


  • Please log in to reply
113 replies to this topic

_EXODUZ_ #1 Posted 17 February 2018 - 03:09 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 35102 battles
  • 1,938
  • [RGT] RGT
  • Member since:
    11-05-2014

Just thought this might be interesting for some of you.

 

 

And a new map called Glacier:



TheWarrener #2 Posted 17 February 2018 - 03:32 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 3587 battles
  • 355
  • Member since:
    10-31-2017
While I'm glad Windstorm is out, what the f*ck is Highway still doing in the game?

LIL_Veky #3 Posted 17 February 2018 - 03:32 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 7916 battles
  • 44
  • Member since:
    10-31-2015
I will really miss Widepark if they remove it for good. It's a such a beautiful and nostalgic map. Windstorm is nice also. I don't really care about the others.

Element6 #4 Posted 17 February 2018 - 03:38 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 29368 battles
  • 10,394
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    01-06-2013
I will not be missing Swamp south spawn where 90% of teams totally ignore the east flank...

Jotneblod #5 Posted 17 February 2018 - 03:39 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 1007 battles
  • 179
  • [-UM] -UM
  • Member since:
    01-01-2015

I think we'll get some negative nancies whining about the map pool getting smaller but I think there's enough reasons to remove all of these maps. Personally I quite like Stalingrad and have lately been even finding Swamp OK and think they are much better than a lot of maps but I can live with them being gone. I'm just sad to not see Arctic Region and Airfield listed.

 

I think less maps is fine as long as bad maps are being removed.


Edited by Jotneblod, 17 February 2018 - 03:42 PM.


smokeytheband1t #6 Posted 17 February 2018 - 03:46 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 8454 battles
  • 58
  • Member since:
    12-05-2016
no more swamp.. nice

Solstad1069 #7 Posted 17 February 2018 - 03:46 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 41019 battles
  • 3,216
  • Member since:
    06-15-2013
 That new map looked like my World of Warships harbour, very much DEAD  :mellow:

Bordhaw #8 Posted 17 February 2018 - 03:50 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 11691 battles
  • 2,632
  • Member since:
    01-29-2017

Old news, all the new maps and maps that have been changed are on the test server. 

 

http://forum.worldoftanks.eu/index.php?/forum/2652-public-test/

 

View Post_EXODUZ_, on 17 February 2018 - 02:09 PM, said:

Just thought this might be interesting for some of you.

 

 

 

 

 


The_Georgian_One #9 Posted 17 February 2018 - 04:02 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 37173 battles
  • 1,630
  • [KOFN] KOFN
  • Member since:
    01-05-2015
Happy to see Windstorm out. Now they only need to remove Abbey, Mountain Pass and Highway and we have most of the crap maps gone. I really don't care about smaller map pool if the bad ones are not there.

Edited by The_Georgian_One, 17 February 2018 - 04:03 PM.


dimethylcadmium #10 Posted 17 February 2018 - 04:03 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 6945 battles
  • 770
  • [WGL-A] WGL-A
  • Member since:
    11-24-2017

Swamp is nice in Tier 6-7-8, absolute ebola when there are Tier 9 and 10s.

Widepark should be only for tiers 3-5

Kharkov is ebola in Tier 8-9-10

Highway is ebola in Tier 8-9-10

Windstorm is ebola in Tier 8-9-10

Stalingrad is ebola in Tier 8-9-10

 

Maybe they should balance the high tier tanks properlyinstead of removing maps? All these maps are perfectly fine in mid tier matchups, Tier 5-7. 

 



Jumping_TurtIe #11 Posted 17 February 2018 - 04:21 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 6268 battles
  • 999
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    02-26-2015
Must remove Kharkov also!

smokeytheband1t #12 Posted 17 February 2018 - 04:30 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 8454 battles
  • 58
  • Member since:
    12-05-2016

View PostJumping_TurtIe, on 17 February 2018 - 04:21 PM, said:

Must remove Kharkov also!

 

Don't think they will tho.. it's in line with the meta they are going for ..

leggasiini #13 Posted 17 February 2018 - 04:59 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 14857 battles
  • 6,215
  • [-GLO-] -GLO-
  • Member since:
    12-01-2012

Potential Widepark and Highway rework, good. Kharkov is getting reworked and we already kinda know how it will go (seen supertest pics earlier).

 

Swamp is bad, good riddance.

 

Windstorm is also bad, good riddance.

 

Stalingrad is terrible, good riddance.

 

Mittengard is also pretty terrible, good riddance.

 

Sacred Valley is quite lackluster and can be annoying, but I dont feel like its "that" bad, could just use a slight rework. Why the hell is Paris (probably universally the most hated map) staying in the game, btw :confused: 



Steve8066 #14 Posted 17 February 2018 - 04:59 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 12525 battles
  • 841
  • Member since:
    10-06-2015
for me the only 1 on that list that needs removing is Mittengard, i dont have a problem with any of the others.

hasnainrakha57 #15 Posted 17 February 2018 - 05:04 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 14376 battles
  • 630
  • [WFTTE] WFTTE
  • Member since:
    08-01-2013
Nice they remove all 6 good maps now the chances for malinovka,firey slient and sand river. 99.9 percent you will be seeing these useless map.

Edited by hasnainrakha57, 17 February 2018 - 05:04 PM.


250swb #16 Posted 17 February 2018 - 05:04 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 22927 battles
  • 5,134
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    09-23-2015
I'm especially glad Sacred Valley and Stalingrad are on the list, but surely not Mittengard! I don't know what players have against Mittengard, admittedly it has nothing to do with anything that comes after it in the game, but the mayhem is unique and bonkers and the downside of removal is that Mines will be cycled more often which can't be good.

Edited by 250swb, 17 February 2018 - 05:05 PM.


8126Jakobsson #17 Posted 17 February 2018 - 05:14 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 67640 battles
  • 3,484
  • Member since:
    12-20-2014

View Post250swb, on 17 February 2018 - 05:04 PM, said:

I'm especially glad Sacred Valley and Stalingrad are on the list, but surely not Mittengard! I don't know what players have against Mittengard, admittedly it has nothing to do with anything that comes after it in the game, but the mayhem is unique and bonkers and the downside of removal is that Mines will be cycled more often which can't be good.

 

​I agree that Mittengard should stay. It's unique baby tier chaos and has it place in the game. With that said I would rather play Mines at that tier any time.  :P 

SlyMeerkat #18 Posted 17 February 2018 - 05:18 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 16604 battles
  • 2,238
  • [FILO] FILO
  • Member since:
    01-29-2013
I am interested to see what they bring back eventually 

Isharial #19 Posted 17 February 2018 - 05:25 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 20173 battles
  • 2,380
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    12-19-2015

sad to see swamp leave... even if the teams did completely avoid east flank from south spawn, still had some very nice games on it

 

the others? good riddance! well.. maybe not :amazed: that just means we'll all be forced ever more so onto the frontal armour of idiots in VK100P :sceptic:


 

Stalingrad was awful, could have done with more roads being opened up so flanking was actually a thing

windstorm? wont miss it

mittengard? good bye to this useless map. the cause of such a pathetic playerbase that after 20k games asks what a gun rammer does :facepalm:


 


 

that map looks like a slight change in direction.. one that range seems to be an actual useable tactic without camping the base spawn, but its ruski vid, probably wont come to EU, itll be a winter version of paris for us instead


 


 

 

 



adameitas #20 Posted 17 February 2018 - 05:29 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 63846 battles
  • 860
  • Member since:
    07-29-2011
i kinda liked swamp, games at least lasts longer in it... Wont gonna miss all others. Also why not add hellparis to this list?




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users