Jump to content


Which performance rating should I use/follow?

WN8 Personal Rating Efficiency

  • Please log in to reply
57 replies to this topic

Ryn1k #1 Posted 17 February 2018 - 05:21 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 1664 battles
  • 96
  • Member since:
    01-08-2018

Title pretty much sums it all. I read a while back that the Personal Rating of WoT would now be similiar to WN8, but am not sure, couldn't find the text anywhere anymore.

 

Which rating should I be looking at now? WN8? Personal Rating? Eff? Few years back everyone was looking at WN8, but I'm not up to speed. Cheers for help.



Steve8066 #2 Posted 17 February 2018 - 05:36 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 12967 battles
  • 884
  • Member since:
    10-06-2015
none, play the game to have fun. If its enjoyable for you, your rating is irrelevent.

Nishi_Kinuyo #3 Posted 17 February 2018 - 05:40 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 7872 battles
  • 4,558
  • [GUP] GUP
  • Member since:
    05-28-2011
Lumberjack rating of course.

Snake_Keeper #4 Posted 17 February 2018 - 05:40 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 9232 battles
  • 728
  • Member since:
    02-04-2016
Thou shalt follow the Blitzkrieg rating.

NUKLEAR_SLUG #5 Posted 17 February 2018 - 06:11 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 30558 battles
  • 2,564
  • Member since:
    06-13-2015
I hear RUSH rating is the main contender to take over from WN8 as metric of choice. It's broadly based off the number of sleipnir moves you perform per battle so as long as you can maintain a healthy average it'll reflect in both your rating and the corresponding adoration of the forum plebs.

Sfinski #6 Posted 17 February 2018 - 06:35 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 32262 battles
  • 2,753
  • [-PJ-] -PJ-
  • Member since:
    09-26-2013
Winrate is the most important. 

AliceUnchained #7 Posted 17 February 2018 - 06:42 PM

    General

  • Player
  • 38414 battles
  • 8,928
  • [322] 322
  • Member since:
    10-18-2011
With that battle count you should be more concerned about getting to know the game basics. Obsession with ratings this early would suggest a try hard re-roll however...

Edited by AliceUnchained, 17 February 2018 - 06:43 PM.


Enforcer1975 #8 Posted 17 February 2018 - 06:44 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 20973 battles
  • 10,935
  • [D0NG] D0NG
  • Member since:
    05-04-2014

It's a bit early for you to worry about stats. Choose some lines you want to grind and try your best when you have at least 1k games. That's when i started to monitor my progress. 

But if you want to know what's important. Doing damage at the right place at the right time, reading the map and flow of the battle and adapt when possible. Don't camp like i did my first 1-2k games...i thought i was doing well but i was actually hampering my team with my mentallity back then, 



Skiferu #9 Posted 17 February 2018 - 06:53 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 28903 battles
  • 147
  • Member since:
    10-06-2012

View PostNUKLEAR_SLUG, on 17 February 2018 - 05:11 PM, said:

I hear RUSH rating is the main contender to take over from WN8 as metric of choice. It's broadly based off the number of sleipnir moves you perform per battle so as long as you can maintain a healthy average it'll reflect in both your rating and the corresponding adoration of the forum plebs.

 

I support this.

 

Coverwrap is Endless, Sleipnir move is Eternal.

Check out the spreadsheet: https://docs.google....t#gid=941807842

 

Eternal sunshine in dryggasil or something i guess....


Edited by Skiferu, 17 February 2018 - 06:56 PM.


HeidenSieker #10 Posted 17 February 2018 - 06:53 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 10046 battles
  • 4,652
  • Member since:
    03-26-2016

View PostAliceUnchained, on 17 February 2018 - 06:42 PM, said:

With that battle count you should be more concerned about getting to know the game basics. Obsession with ratings this early would suggest a try hard re-roll however...

 

"Above average, 29 vehicles, 428 battles"..... "Few years back everyone was looking at WN8, but I'm not up to speed".....

HeidenSieker #11 Posted 17 February 2018 - 06:55 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 10046 battles
  • 4,652
  • Member since:
    03-26-2016

View PostSkiferu, on 17 February 2018 - 06:53 PM, said:

 

Eh?

Archaean #12 Posted 17 February 2018 - 06:57 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 15716 battles
  • 1,278
  • [S4LT] S4LT
  • Member since:
    04-25-2015

View PostSteve8066, on 17 February 2018 - 05:36 PM, said:

none, play the game to have fun. If its enjoyable for you, your rating is irrelevent.

 

Don't decide for others how to play the game. If he wants to play to reach certain stats then that's his freaking deal.

Skiferu #13 Posted 17 February 2018 - 06:58 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 28903 battles
  • 147
  • Member since:
    10-06-2012

View PostHeidenSieker, on 17 February 2018 - 05:55 PM, said:

 

Eh?

 

I dont got an clue what it is, cuconests betatest for RushRating i guess.

 

He has put a lot of celebs from the forum in the spreadsheet.


Edited by Skiferu, 17 February 2018 - 07:01 PM.


8126Jakobsson #14 Posted 17 February 2018 - 06:59 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 68898 battles
  • 3,655
  • Member since:
    12-20-2014
For a reroller all that matters is the FK rating. Less than one Fort Knox per month is not ok.

Edited by 8126Jakobsson, 17 February 2018 - 07:00 PM.


Ryn1k #15 Posted 17 February 2018 - 07:29 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 1664 battles
  • 96
  • Member since:
    01-08-2018

It's not my first account, obviously, I simply made a new one after being on a long break since this time around I know the basics. Fun is subjective, for me it is to try and develop and become better.

 

Now, is there anyone with actual knowledge of which metric is the most encompassing to follow your performance? I see a lot of people still displaying WN8 atleast, but was also wondering how does WG's own Personal Rating compare now.


Edited by Ryn1k, 17 February 2018 - 07:38 PM.


IncandescentGerbil #16 Posted 17 February 2018 - 07:41 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 35775 battles
  • 1,453
  • Member since:
    11-24-2015
Girlfriend quality metric carries more weight in the real world.

Shivva #17 Posted 17 February 2018 - 07:43 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 29809 battles
  • 1,958
  • [J_A_G] J_A_G
  • Member since:
    05-20-2012

View PostRyn1k, on 17 February 2018 - 04:21 PM, said:

Title pretty much sums it all. I read a while back that the Personal Rating of WoT would now be similiar to WN8, but am not sure, couldn't find the text anywhere anymore.

 

Which rating should I be looking at now? WN8? Personal Rating? Eff? Few years back everyone was looking at WN8, but I'm not up to speed. Cheers for help.

 

use the same one that you used on your previous accounts...oh wait that wasn't good enough for you, you had to make yet another account. Probably best just to make up your own stat to save you rerolling anymore and just tell yourself that your the bestest.

Ryn1k #18 Posted 17 February 2018 - 07:58 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 1664 battles
  • 96
  • Member since:
    01-08-2018

View PostShivva, on 17 February 2018 - 07:43 PM, said:

 

use the same one that you used on your previous accounts...oh wait that wasn't good enough for you, you had to make yet another account. Probably best just to make up your own stat to save you rerolling anymore and just tell yourself that your the bestest.

 

Firstly this is my second account, and secondly, you seem very upset about someones choice to play a game in a way that they find interesting.

Must be tough when someone decides to like a food you hate.

Anyhows, I guess I'll stick with WN8 since it appears no one has any real information on how Personal Rating compares.

Shivva #19 Posted 17 February 2018 - 08:06 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 29809 battles
  • 1,958
  • [J_A_G] J_A_G
  • Member since:
    05-20-2012

View PostRyn1k, on 17 February 2018 - 06:58 PM, said:

 

Firstly this is my second account, and secondly, you seem very upset about someones choice to play a game in a way that they find interesting.

Must be tough when someone decides to like a food you hate.

Anyhows, I guess I'll stick with WN8 since it appears no one has any real information on how Personal Rating compares.

 

Please point out the part of my post where I sound upset... you're in for a real shock once you grow up and are allowed outside by yourself if you feel what what I posted was the sound of someone who was upset.

Spurtung #20 Posted 17 February 2018 - 08:38 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 65991 battles
  • 5,900
  • [GW-UP] GW-UP
  • Member since:
    07-05-2013

View PostSkiferu, on 17 February 2018 - 07:58 PM, said:

He has put a lot of celebs from the forum in the spreadsheet.

He's also delusional, and that's me being nice.







Also tagged with WN8, Personal Rating, Efficiency

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users