Jump to content


Which performance rating should I use/follow?

WN8 Personal Rating Efficiency

  • Please log in to reply
57 replies to this topic

Bora_BOOM #41 Posted 19 February 2018 - 12:18 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 21091 battles
  • 2,590
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    08-23-2014

Follow the one and only real rating: GOLD SPAM RATING %

It requires no performance and it is boosted very easily.

 

Your welcome.


Edited by Bora_BOOM, 19 February 2018 - 12:21 PM.


Geno1isme #42 Posted 19 February 2018 - 03:11 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 41108 battles
  • 6,946
  • [TRYIT] TRYIT
  • Member since:
    09-03-2013

View PostRyn1k, on 17 February 2018 - 06:21 PM, said:

Title pretty much sums it all. I read a while back that the Personal Rating of WoT would now be similiar to WN8, but am not sure, couldn't find the text anywhere anymore.

 

Which rating should I be looking at now? WN8? Personal Rating? Eff? Few years back everyone was looking at WN8, but I'm not up to speed. Cheers for help.

 

To clarify: The PR formula hasn't changed, it's the same it has always been. However a while ago WG came up with a new rating WGR for their new hall of fame: https://worldoftanks.eu/en/ratings/

However AFAIK that rating is not available via API and not all details regarding calculation were published, and the hall of fame site itself is quite useless to get an overview, so nobody really cares about it.

 

So basically nothing has changed regarding ratings in the last 2-3 years. Only they all became even more useless due to balancing and mechanic changes.



VarzA #43 Posted 19 February 2018 - 03:21 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 18072 battles
  • 1,120
  • [USAGI] USAGI
  • Member since:
    06-17-2011

View PostRyn1k, on 17 February 2018 - 05:21 PM, said:

Title pretty much sums it all. I read a while back that the Personal Rating of WoT would now be similiar to WN8, but am not sure, couldn't find the text anywhere anymore.

 

Which rating should I be looking at now? WN8? Personal Rating? Eff? Few years back everyone was looking at WN8, but I'm not up to speed. Cheers for help.

 

Personal rating is a complex formula that takes into account almost everything, including # of battles, of tanks, etc ...

WN8 only takes into account damage and it can be very easily manipulated (gold ammo, play overachieving tanks for their class/tier),

 

Imho, winrate is a good indicator but not always .... i got my 1st MOE on T-43 with something like 30% winrate, but also the whole MOE thing.

If you have 1st MOE you are in the top 35% of players of that tank, 2nd means you are in the top 15% and 3rd means you are in the top 5%.

This means at 1st moe you are in the best 7/20, 3/20 for 2nd and 1/20 for 3rd.

 

However, even the whole MOE can be rigged somewhat, by using premium consumables and spamming gold to ensure more penetrations/damage, by having the best crew you can get, and free xp-ing mods in the grind, or in the case of very rare tanks, asking someone who has the same tank (or several ppl) to play like a muppet in order to reduce the requirements for them.



Anthony_1972 #44 Posted 19 February 2018 - 05:05 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 7349 battles
  • 126
  • Member since:
    03-29-2016

MOE only gives information amount the amount of damage you do relative to other people playing that tank.  The rating has nothing to do with WR. 

 

While in general, doing more damage tends to win battles, there are lots of ways that it doesn't.   We all know the situation where the top tier HT sits at the red line, forcing his paper TD's to do the front line fighting...   



Cuck0osNest #45 Posted 16 March 2018 - 10:32 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 6937 battles
  • 724
  • [YGDRA] YGDRA
  • Member since:
    07-25-2016

View PostAikl, on 18 February 2018 - 10:15 AM, said:

 

How can a  rating system that puts me over Brumbarr be even close to delusional? :P

 

Solution is Recent RR1 from 0.8.8 patch or so. You are *edited* anyway just different styles and amounts of game comforts used.

Edited by NickMustaine, 19 March 2018 - 12:48 PM.
Provocations


Aikl #46 Posted 17 March 2018 - 12:15 AM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 25163 battles
  • 4,238
  • [-MM] -MM
  • Member since:
    04-13-2011

View PostCuck0osNest, on 16 March 2018 - 09:32 PM, said:

 

Solution is Recent RR1 from 0.8.8 patch or so. You are both loosers anyway just different styles and amounts of game comforts used.

 

Nice gravedigging. Please don't call me a 'looser' for no particular reason. It's pretty obvious that Brumbarr here is the better player, regardless of numbers.

 

Also, funny how you've gone from friendly, when you noticed I liked your rating system and shared your taste in music, to rude when you think people question it. You just end up appearing childish.

 

 



Jigabachi #47 Posted 17 March 2018 - 01:13 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 17852 battles
  • 18,164
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    08-12-2011
Why the hell is that guy not permabanned yet?

Troubledove #48 Posted 17 March 2018 - 08:09 AM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 41987 battles
  • 2,323
  • Member since:
    09-07-2011
Winrate should be your rating. By measuring and improving your winrate you are doing proper.

LordMuffin #49 Posted 17 March 2018 - 09:57 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 47401 battles
  • 10,516
  • [-GLO-] -GLO-
  • Member since:
    06-21-2011
Lumberjack rating is one of the better,  just sad it got removed.

IncandescentGerbil #50 Posted 17 March 2018 - 02:20 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 35597 battles
  • 1,443
  • Member since:
    11-24-2015
Notches on bedpost rating. Everything else is virtually useless.

dimethylcadmium #51 Posted 17 March 2018 - 02:22 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 5182 battles
  • 770
  • [WGL-A] WGL-A
  • Member since:
    11-24-2017
Which one? The best one:  Rush™ rating

Cuck0osNest #52 Posted 17 March 2018 - 10:16 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 6937 battles
  • 724
  • [YGDRA] YGDRA
  • Member since:
    07-25-2016

 

View PostAikl, on 17 March 2018 - 12:15 AM, said:

 

Nice gravedigging. Please don't call me a 'looser' for no particular reason. It's pretty obvious that Brumbarr here is the better player, regardless of numbers.

 

Also, funny how you've gone from friendly, when you noticed I liked your rating system and shared your taste in music, to rude when you think people question it. You just end up appearing childish.

 

 

I dont think you liked or understand it. Now after reacting like a girl on truth you can start to dislike it. Even if aufkpanthers kamikazes will still matter as equalization to free exploring tier 10 by twink accounts without grinding modules.

View PostTroubledove, on 17 March 2018 - 08:09 AM, said:

Winrate should be your rating. By measuring and improving your winrate you are doing proper.
 

Noone said platooning is wrong. But there are things to expect if platoon is really improoving.


Edited by Cuck0osNest, 17 March 2018 - 10:26 PM.


Aikl #53 Posted 17 March 2018 - 10:25 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 25163 battles
  • 4,238
  • [-MM] -MM
  • Member since:
    04-13-2011

View PostCuck0osNest, on 17 March 2018 - 09:16 PM, said:

 

I dont think you liked or understand it. Now after reacting like a girl on truth you can start to dislike it. Even if aufkpanthers kamikazes will still matter as equalization to free exploring tier 10 by twink accounts without grinding modules.

 

While my 'kamikazes' are not a result of padding RRTM, you have to admit it detracts from your rating system that someone fond of ramming enemy tanks are deemed superior to players that are, undeniably, better. I still think it has some merit, in that it actually has some 'safeguards' against e.g. WN8-padding. Believe it or not.

 

Still, your reply sort of reinforces my initial observation; striking back with 'no you are'-insults is a surefire way of losing debates on the Internet. Having no real content in your post further adds to that.

 

Looking forward to your extensive, and hopefully comprehensible, explanation of the infallible RRTM. If you've spent a lot of time on it, I'm sure you'd like nothing more than for the plebeian masses to understand and start using it.



Cuck0osNest #54 Posted 17 March 2018 - 10:38 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 6937 battles
  • 724
  • [YGDRA] YGDRA
  • Member since:
    07-25-2016

View PostAikl, on 17 March 2018 - 10:25 PM, said:

 

While my 'kamikazes' are not a result of padding RRTM, you have to admit it detracts from your rating system that someone fond of ramming enemy tanks are deemed superior to players that are, undeniably, better. I still think it has some merit, in that it actually has some 'safeguards' against e.g. WN8-padding. Believe it or not.

 

Still, your reply sort of reinforces my initial observation; striking back with 'no you are'-insults is a surefire way of losing debates on the Internet. Having no real content in your post further adds to that.

 

Looking forward to your extensive, and hopefully comprehensible, explanation of the infallible RRTM. If you've spent a lot of time on it, I'm sure you'd like nothing more than for the plebeian masses to understand and continue using wn8.

I see you went already far with your delusions.


Edited by Cuck0osNest, 17 March 2018 - 10:43 PM.


Hardass #55 Posted 17 March 2018 - 10:41 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Beta Tester
  • 32647 battles
  • 1,189
  • Member since:
    08-03-2010

None of them take your stats chuck them in the bin and just play for the fun of the game you will be a happy tanker forever.

 

 



Aikl #56 Posted 18 March 2018 - 12:52 AM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 25163 battles
  • 4,238
  • [-MM] -MM
  • Member since:
    04-13-2011

View PostCuck0osNest, on 17 March 2018 - 09:38 PM, said:

I see you went already far with your delusions.

 

Thanks for basically proving my point. At this point you're basically repeating fancy words, which ultimately make little sense.

 

I'm gonna have to assume that you have some trouble explaining RRTM in a comprehensible way. That mean it's either hard to explain because there isn't anything in the first place, or it is so absurdly advanced that us plebeians can't possibly understand it.

You have a lot to prove, and that's both in regards to your manners, verbal skills and your so-called rating system. I'm guessing you aren't out to make friends, but a considerate tone is often appreciated on public forums. Just saying.


Edited by Aikl, 18 March 2018 - 12:56 AM.


Cuck0osNest #57 Posted 18 March 2018 - 03:44 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 6937 battles
  • 724
  • [YGDRA] YGDRA
  • Member since:
    07-25-2016

View PostAikl, on 18 March 2018 - 12:52 AM, said:

 

Thanks for basically proving my point. At this point you're basically repeating fancy words, which ultimately make little sense.

 

I'm gonna have to assume that you have some trouble explaining RRTM in a comprehensible way. That mean it's either hard to explain because there isn't anything in the first place, or it is so absurdly advanced that us plebeians can't possibly understand it.

You have a lot to prove, and that's both in regards to your manners, verbal skills and your so-called rating system. I'm guessing you aren't out to make friends, but a considerate tone is often appreciated on public forums. Just saying.

At least i tested you, but still this is your words "close to delusional" and being impressed by someones gold fire.



Aikl #58 Posted 18 March 2018 - 09:30 AM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 25163 battles
  • 4,238
  • [-MM] -MM
  • Member since:
    04-13-2011

View PostCuck0osNest, on 18 March 2018 - 02:44 AM, said:

At least i tested you, but still this is your words "close to delusional" and being impressed by someones gold fire.

 

If you paid any attention or did any kind of research, you'd notice that Brumbarr challenged the community to spam gold at their heart's content to beat his average damage figures without premium ammo.

 

Still waiting on RR explaining that. Oh, and some insults that actually make sense. Looking forward to it.







Also tagged with WN8, Personal Rating, Efficiency

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users