Jump to content


Tiger 1 HD - Stop Complaining

Tiger

  • Please log in to reply
11 replies to this topic

SgtPinback #1 Posted 17 February 2018 - 06:45 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 43152 battles
  • 48
  • Member since:
    12-21-2012

You cannot complain about the Tiger 1 revamp if you drive around with the L71 gun. Looks ridiculous.

 

 

 


 

Thank heaven for the Tiger 131 at T6.


 

Ditto Pudel. Panther looks wrong any other way.



xx984 #2 Posted 17 February 2018 - 06:51 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 55077 battles
  • 2,520
  • [GO-IN] GO-IN
  • Member since:
    08-11-2013
ok

_Old_Deus_Yenger_ #3 Posted 17 February 2018 - 07:02 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 21206 battles
  • 27
  • [-B-C-] -B-C-
  • Member since:
    01-02-2015
What's there to complain about? It has a balance log now~

BonjiOrongji #4 Posted 17 February 2018 - 08:04 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 40911 battles
  • 1,206
  • [RMBLE] RMBLE
  • Member since:
    06-10-2011
just a few ppl complain about the new tiger 1 model ... most ppl actually like it

MaxxyNL #5 Posted 17 February 2018 - 08:28 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 11349 battles
  • 979
  • Member since:
    04-05-2013

View PostSgtPinback, on 17 February 2018 - 06:45 PM, said:

You cannot complain about the Tiger 1 revamp if you drive around with the L71 gun. Looks ridiculous.

 

 

 


 

Thank heaven for the Tiger 131 at T6.


 

Ditto Pudel. Panther looks wrong any other way.

 

Interesting....

Snake_Keeper #6 Posted 17 February 2018 - 08:31 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 9032 battles
  • 717
  • Member since:
    02-04-2016
Just about the only thing I don't like about it visually is the missing parts, looks like it came from the very gates of Moscow. Gameplay wise..why don't the spare tracks give spaced armor like they do on so many others. And Fury should have taught them that the logs give tons of armor.

Tinbawx #7 Posted 17 February 2018 - 09:50 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 14747 battles
  • 1,251
  • [SNOB] SNOB
  • Member since:
    01-31-2011
Didn´t complain about it. It does look like straight from the scrap yard though.

mortalsatsuma #8 Posted 17 February 2018 - 10:26 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 13242 battles
  • 1,638
  • Member since:
    06-13-2014

View PostSnake_Keeper, on 17 February 2018 - 08:31 PM, said:

Just about the only thing I don't like about it visually is the missing parts, looks like it came from the very gates of Moscow. Gameplay wise..why don't the spare tracks give spaced armor like they do on so many others. And Fury should have taught them that the logs give tons of armor.

 

Because is not Russian comrade! Seriously though, a lot of people complained about that and I would not be surprised if that was one of the reasons that WG 'reworked' the already HD model into a different model and removed the track links on the front whilst they were at it. 



FluffyRedFox #9 Posted 17 February 2018 - 10:50 PM

    General

  • Player
  • 22971 battles
  • 8,400
  • Member since:
    12-05-2012
but its not historical REEEEEEEEEEEEE

Desyatnik_Pansy #10 Posted 17 February 2018 - 10:56 PM

    Bartender

  • Player
  • 16440 battles
  • 25,863
  • [-GLO-] -GLO-
  • Member since:
    04-19-2013

View Postmortalsatsuma, on 17 February 2018 - 09:26 PM, said:

Because is not Russian comrade! Seriously though, a lot of people complained about that and I would not be surprised if that was one of the reasons that WG 'reworked' the already HD model into a different model and removed the track links on the front whilst they were at it. 

 

The reason they reworked it is it's one of the older HD Models. They've redone the Panther and Churchill I Too, and are likely to do the T-54 and T-55A As well in due time. Here is the Panther comparison, between the original "HD" model and the reworked one.

Spoiler

 



dimethylcadmium #11 Posted 17 February 2018 - 11:15 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 6274 battles
  • 770
  • [WGL-A] WGL-A
  • Member since:
    11-24-2017

View PostDesyatnik_Pansy, on 17 February 2018 - 10:56 PM, said:

 

The reason they reworked it is it's one of the older HD Models. They've redone the Panther and Churchill I Too, and are likely to do the T-54 and T-55A As well in due time. Here is the Panther comparison, between the original "HD" model and the reworked one.

 

 

 As far as i'm concerned the old Panther and Churchill I looked much better. I really don't get their point. They make the Tiger I look like it fought in WW2, Vietnam, Gulf War and Yugo Wars all combined, looks like it's about to fall apart any moment. They say because it was "too clean" and "not battle-worn". Then they re-work the Churchill I and make it basically in MINT condition, with not a single speck of mud on the whole tank. 

 


Edited by dimethylcadmium, 17 February 2018 - 11:19 PM.


Desyatnik_Pansy #12 Posted 18 February 2018 - 01:35 AM

    Bartender

  • Player
  • 16440 battles
  • 25,863
  • [-GLO-] -GLO-
  • Member since:
    04-19-2013

View Postdimethylcadmium, on 17 February 2018 - 10:15 PM, said:

 As far as i'm concerned the old Panther and Churchill I looked much better. I really don't get their point. They make the Tiger I look like it fought in WW2, Vietnam, Gulf War and Yugo Wars all combined, looks like it's about to fall apart any moment. They say because it was "too clean" and "not battle-worn". Then they re-work the Churchill I and make it basically in MINT condition, with not a single speck of mud on the whole tank. 

 

Personally I can't agree. I don't really care so much about the way the tank actually "looks", whether it's battle-hardened or clean as could be. Texture-quality wise these tanks were previously terrible (they were as I like to call them, "glorified" SD Textures". The quality was very similar to the SD Textures of tanks, the only difference was SD Textures were for the whole tank; chassis, hull, turret and gun all in one while the glorified SD Ones separated them, but were still as bad), and the updated versions are much better. 

 

It also works better for us reskinners. The glorified SD Textures couldn't really be retextured as nicely as later HD Models. FastestClassic over on NA For example didn't do the Tiger I or Panther with his skin packs because they looked nothing like every other HD Model. With the updated models, they have been done and look fantastic. I'm sure some reskinners like Sgt_Krollnikow will take a look at the Tiger I And perhaps reskin it in a way that gives it more of the vibe that other wants from it I guess.







Also tagged with Tiger

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users