Jump to content


T 34-3

T34 3 Chinese tanks Premium Tanks

  • Please log in to reply
30 replies to this topic

SovietPowerSupreme #1 Posted 20 February 2018 - 02:08 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 15461 battles
  • 18
  • Member since:
    11-09-2011

So i just bought this tank(i know,im an idiot).i like the way the tank looks(brings back memories) and i think that was the main factor why i bought it,but it is so bad.Worst gun i have seen in this game.i mean,its not right that i have to load premium rounds(wich are 5800 credits each) just to pen a tier 6.At the same or higher tier its 50/50 if you can pen tanks with premium.Its just not a fun tank to play,and its  a pain to always hunt for weak spots even when you are top tier,and when you finally see that LFP,youre fully zoomed,you fire,round goes 2 meters in front of you in the dirt.I regret not getting the Super Pershing or the premium tier 8 chinese TD.I can get around the bad armor,bad gun handling and constant module damage,but please do something about the penetration because its abysmal!

PS: Im not a good player by any means,but it is suppose to be fun,thats why we play the game!



thestaggy #2 Posted 20 February 2018 - 02:21 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 14841 battles
  • 1,932
  • Member since:
    04-24-2015

I'm busy with the mid-tier Chinese meds and I hope their line gets looked at, as WG have recently been on a mission to tweak nations.

 

Don't understand why the T-34-2 and T-34-3 get ebola guns while the STG gets a 215 pen/390 alpha gun with decent handling.



SovietPowerSupreme #3 Posted 20 February 2018 - 02:28 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 15461 battles
  • 18
  • Member since:
    11-09-2011

View Postthestaggy, on 20 February 2018 - 02:21 PM, said:

I'm busy with the mid-tier Chinese meds and I hope their line gets looked at, as WG have recently been on a mission to tweak nations.

 

Don't understand why the T-34-2 and T-34-3 get ebola guns while the STG gets a 215 pen/390 alpha gun with decent handling.

 

A 215 penetration would be a dream.IF they buff the gun penetration a little..it would be a great tank,even with all its flaws(gun handling module dmg etc) but in this state its just not very enjoyable!Its pure damn frustrating,and now we have this new line of super armored soviet tanks.Good luck with those.I do hope they take a look at the chinese line

 


Edited by SovietPowerSupreme, 20 February 2018 - 02:29 PM.


doriansky1 #4 Posted 20 February 2018 - 02:31 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 27125 battles
  • 182
  • [SKIL1] SKIL1
  • Member since:
    12-14-2015

It's a tier 8 premium with pref. MM, in other words it's completely out of the game meta nowadays. Like the SuperPershing, Jg.Tiger 8.8 , etc, this is a tier 7.5 tank. However, you do have decent mobility (compared with SuperPershing you are super fast) and more than decent turret armor. Gun handling used to be much worse until couple of patches ago. Penetration is AIDS, but at least you have good HEAT rounds....make sure you pen those. 

 

 



doriansky1 #5 Posted 20 February 2018 - 02:32 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 27125 battles
  • 182
  • [SKIL1] SKIL1
  • Member since:
    12-14-2015

View PostSovietPowerSupreme, on 20 February 2018 - 02:08 PM, said:

PS: Im not a good player by any means,but it is suppose to be fun,thats why we play the game!

 

Playing tier 8 cannot be fun. Unless you play 252U, playing tier 8 it's like prostitution : you sell your dignity for money. 



Ceeb #6 Posted 20 February 2018 - 02:35 PM

    Major General

  • Beta Tester
  • 30079 battles
  • 5,168
  • Member since:
    01-14-2011

I've just starting playing the 34-3 and having a blast to be fair, We've been in a three ship wreaking havoc. 

 

We do this with focus fire... its rare that all three in the toon will bounce.

 

I like it.... > than the Type 59 IMO.... I can say this for certain as I read it on the internet.



SovietPowerSupreme #7 Posted 20 February 2018 - 02:36 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 15461 battles
  • 18
  • Member since:
    11-09-2011

View Postdoriansky1, on 20 February 2018 - 02:31 PM, said:

It's a tier 8 premium with pref. MM, in other words it's completely out of the game meta nowadays. Like the SuperPershing, Jg.Tiger 8.8 , etc, this is a tier 7.5 tank. However, you do have decent mobility (compared with SuperPershing you are super fast) and more than decent turret armor. Gun handling used to be much worse until couple of patches ago. Penetration is AIDS, but at least you have good HEAT rounds....make sure you pen those. 

 

 

 

Yes,but even those premium rounds are so so.I fired 3 premium rounds at the side of a t44/100,and not a single penetration.he then continued to butcher me,as i tried to hide for 12 seconds until i reloaded.ITs not a bad tank by any means,as i stated in my original post,but that gun just does not cut it,its very frustrating to play sometimes.a small pen buff and would be perfect!

doriansky1 #8 Posted 20 February 2018 - 02:38 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 27125 battles
  • 182
  • [SKIL1] SKIL1
  • Member since:
    12-14-2015

View PostSovietPowerSupreme, on 20 February 2018 - 02:36 PM, said:

 

Yes,but even those premium rounds are so so.I fired 3 premium rounds at the side of a t44/100,and not a single penetration.he then continued to butcher me,as i tried to hide for 12 seconds until i reloaded.ITs not a bad tank by any means,as i stated in my original post,but that gun just does not cut it,its very frustrating to play sometimes.a small pen buff and would be perfect!

 

 In this case, mistakes were done. By you.

 

T44/100 has skirts on the side, you should never shoot HEAT at the side of T44/100.  Not to mention that 175 AP pen is more than enough for the side of that tank.



SovietPowerSupreme #9 Posted 20 February 2018 - 02:38 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 15461 battles
  • 18
  • Member since:
    11-09-2011

View Postdoriansky1, on 20 February 2018 - 02:32 PM, said:

 

Playing tier 8 cannot be fun. Unless you play 252U, playing tier 8 it's like prostitution : you sell your dignity for money. 

 

you do have a point there! :D

Aikl #10 Posted 20 February 2018 - 02:43 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 25167 battles
  • 4,253
  • [-MM] -MM
  • Member since:
    04-13-2011

Check out how the T-34-3 used to be. :P

It has recieved the following buffs throughout the years:

- Increased RoF

- -5 gun depression (from -3)

- Type 59 armor mode + aim time buff

 

It's a niche medium, but it's a decent one if you get used to it (and your crew gets up to speed, of course, I'd hate to play it with a fresh one, ewgh).

 



SovietPowerSupreme #11 Posted 20 February 2018 - 02:44 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 15461 battles
  • 18
  • Member since:
    11-09-2011

View Postdoriansky1, on 20 February 2018 - 02:38 PM, said:

 

 In this case, mistakes were done. By you.

 

T44/100 has skirts on the side, you should never shoot HEAT at the side of T44/100.  Not to mention that 175 AP pen is more than enough for the side of that tank.

 

he was facing me frontally at first and couldnt pen him with normal rounds,that why i loaded heat!But i just stated an example,the fact is,its sometimes infuriating.like i said,im not the best player out there,so i tend to make mistakes sometimes,but i do know where to shoot  and what to shot(weakspots)...But come on,lets face it,175 mm penetration its not enough INMHO.at least dont sell this for 35 euros so that people will come to be dissapointed!Its all im saying.

PauI #12 Posted 20 February 2018 - 02:47 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 24876 battles
  • 386
  • Member since:
    10-15-2011

i like it better than type 59 (played it some games on another account), is decent, it is also true i play it with 5skill crew and food and heat when needed. Of course it is no match to my Lorr40t that is a monster.

I also can not imagine how bad is playing it with no crew skills and food



SovietPowerSupreme #13 Posted 20 February 2018 - 02:49 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 15461 battles
  • 18
  • Member since:
    11-09-2011

View PostAikl, on 20 February 2018 - 02:43 PM, said:

Check out how the T-34-3 used to be. :P

It has recieved the following buffs throughout the years:

- Increased RoF

- -5 gun depression (from -3)

- Type 59 armor mode + aim time buff

 

It's a niche medium, but it's a decent one if you get used to it (and your crew gets up to speed, of course, I'd hate to play it with a fresh one, ewgh).

 

 

i heard that some years ago used to be even worse! like i said,its not the worst tank i played,but its the worst gun i used on a tank! :)

SovietPowerSupreme #14 Posted 20 February 2018 - 02:50 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 15461 battles
  • 18
  • Member since:
    11-09-2011

View PostPauI, on 20 February 2018 - 02:47 PM, said:

i like it better than type 59 (played it some games on another account), is decent, it is also true i play it with 5skill crew and food and heat when needed. Of course it is no match to my Lorr40t that is a monster.

I also can not imagine how bad is playing it with no crew skills and food

 

View PostPauI, on 20 February 2018 - 02:47 PM, said:

i like it better than type 59 (played it some games on another account), is decent, it is also true i play it with 5skill crew and food and heat when needed. Of course it is no match to my Lorr40t that is a monster.

I also can not imagine how bad is playing it with no crew skills and food

 

indeed!those lorr 40 t's eat me up for breakfast! :)

Baldrickk #15 Posted 20 February 2018 - 02:54 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 29506 battles
  • 13,752
  • [-TAH-] -TAH-
  • Member since:
    03-03-2013
The T-34-3 has prem MM and the same gun with the same pen as at least three same tier HTs with the same MM.

Sounds alright to me.
Took my WZ-111 out over the weekend and it did fine

_Sensation_ #16 Posted 20 February 2018 - 02:58 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 6601 battles
  • 525
  • [FAIME] FAIME
  • Member since:
    01-10-2017
What I don't understand is that you know a tank is crap, buy it anyways and then whine on the forum about it?

SovietPowerSupreme #17 Posted 20 February 2018 - 02:59 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 15461 battles
  • 18
  • Member since:
    11-09-2011

View PostBaldrickk, on 20 February 2018 - 02:54 PM, said:

The T-34-3 has prem MM and the same gun with the same pen as at least three same tier HTs with the same MM.

Sounds alright to me.
Took my WZ-111 out over the weekend and it did fine

 

yes,but at least you have armor mate.i cant stay in the open to fully aim and then fire and see a bounce or a miss.i will get chewed up like that.so i must fire,relocate and repeate.you just cant with this gun acc and penetration .

SovietPowerSupreme #18 Posted 20 February 2018 - 03:01 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 15461 battles
  • 18
  • Member since:
    11-09-2011

View Post_Sensation_, on 20 February 2018 - 02:58 PM, said:

What I don't understand is that you know a tank is crap, buy it anyways and then whine on the forum about it?

 

no mate,i bought it more for sentimental value(i used to grow up among t55 romanian variant) but i didn't expected to be this bad,as regards to the guns penetration values,because overall,its not the worst tank out there.i dont whine mate,im just starting a discussion,and get some more opinions on the matter.

SirTogII #19 Posted 20 February 2018 - 03:02 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 46734 battles
  • 548
  • [REQT] REQT
  • Member since:
    11-27-2012

View PostSovietPowerSupreme, on 20 February 2018 - 01:44 PM, said:

 

he was facing me frontally at first and couldnt pen him with normal rounds,that why i loaded heat!But i just stated an example,the fact is,its sometimes infuriating.like i said,im not the best player out there,so i tend to make mistakes sometimes,but i do know where to shoot  and what to shot(weakspots)...But come on,lets face it,175 mm penetration its not enough INMHO.at least dont sell this for 35 euros so that people will come to be dissapointed!Its all im saying.

Sorry but that is bs. If he was hull down you may have had issues with his turret but nothing else. And you tried max one shot is my guess. And if he was in a strong hull down position no reason for him to show his side other than very angled to bait you but I don’t buy it. 

The gun handling is poor but 175 pen is enough to pen most tanks you meet. For tier 9 heavies you’ll need the heat, but also know where and what angles to shoot it to be effective. 

Compared to the Hype59 they’re very close in how effective they are. Pros and cons for both tanks. Tier 8 has issues with MM but as a tier 8 med you’re matched against other tier 8 meds and the T34-3 isn’t bad in comparison unless you can’t stand the derpy nature of the 122mm, but the gun wasn’t a “hidden stat”



SovietPowerSupreme #20 Posted 20 February 2018 - 03:06 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 15461 battles
  • 18
  • Member since:
    11-09-2011

View PostSirTogII, on 20 February 2018 - 03:02 PM, said:

Sorry but that is bs. If he was hull down you may have had issues with his turret but nothing else. And you tried max one shot is my guess. And if he was in a strong hull down position no reason for him to show his side other than very angled to bait you but I don’t buy it. 

The gun handling is poor but 175 pen is enough to pen most tanks you meet. For tier 9 heavies you’ll need the heat, but also know where and what angles to shoot it to be effective. 

Compared to the Hype59 they’re very close in how effective they are. Pros and cons for both tanks. Tier 8 has issues with MM but as a tier 8 med you’re matched against other tier 8 meds and the T34-3 isn’t bad in comparison unless you can’t stand the derpy nature of the 122mm, but the gun wasn’t a “hidden stat”

 

he was showing his turret UFP and a bit of the LFP.i fired,didnt pen,i went forward so i can get him out of that position(he was behind a rock),we both started to marry go round on each other,and that is when i fired at his sides.no pen.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users