Jump to content


We need a "whine here about unfair XP distribution"-pin here...

rankeds sheshul ppl

  • Please log in to reply
13 replies to this topic

K_A #1 Posted 23 February 2018 - 04:45 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 13566 battles
  • 4,656
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    04-18-2013
With multiple threads popping up every day now, all detailing how OP got "robbed" or "scammed by WG" or "rigged" by how little XP they got in this or that ranked battle, wouldn't it be nice if all of them were just crammed into a single thread where these bona fide geniuses, who apparently know how XP is distributed better than anyone else, can compare their post-battle result screens?

WindSplitter1 #2 Posted 23 February 2018 - 05:45 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 14332 battles
  • 1,736
  • [RYNO] RYNO
  • Member since:
    02-07-2016

View PostK_A, on 23 February 2018 - 03:45 PM, said:

With multiple threads popping up every day now, all detailing how OP got "robbed" or "scammed by WG" or "rigged" by how little XP they got in this or that ranked battle, wouldn't it be nice if all of them were just crammed into a single thread where these bona fide geniuses, who apparently know how XP is distributed better than anyone else, can compare their post-battle result screens?

 

The problem with making such a thread is that it attracts the good, sane people to it while the special people who should be using it completely ignores it.

 

The type of person that makes rants lacks the understanding required to post such nonsense in the appropriate thread.

With SPGs and MM, that's easy but we still have the occasional "reee". Individual players more interested in themselves will hardly notice anything but the "Create new thread" button and rant away.

 

It would be a good idea if WG simply forced rants to be in a common thread nonetheless.



8126Jakobsson #3 Posted 23 February 2018 - 05:49 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 61193 battles
  • 2,591
  • Member since:
    12-20-2014
Think it would be better if they pinned a complete explanation about how it works instead.

Shivva #4 Posted 23 February 2018 - 05:52 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 29175 battles
  • 1,909
  • [J_A_G] J_A_G
  • Member since:
    05-20-2012

View Post8126Jakobsson, on 23 February 2018 - 04:49 PM, said:

Think it would be better if they pinned a complete explanation about how it works instead.

 

Put up a Sticky thread and then hit the idiots who start a new thread anyway with a 1 week forum ban, if they can't read then they don't need forum access tbh.

vasilinhorulezz #5 Posted 23 February 2018 - 07:42 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 21244 battles
  • 866
  • Member since:
    09-26-2014

And all it took, was a thread complaining that IS-7 gets rigged xp.

Now everybody sends support tickets to WG, asking why this guy has more xp than me?

I love the internet.



Spurtung #6 Posted 23 February 2018 - 07:46 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 60179 battles
  • 5,532
  • [GW-UP] GW-UP
  • Member since:
    07-05-2013

View Postvasilinhorulezz, on 23 February 2018 - 08:42 PM, said:

And all it took, was a thread complaining that IS-7 gets rigged xp.

Now everybody sends support tickets to WG, asking why this guy has more xp than me?

I love the internet.

 



Homer_J #7 Posted 23 February 2018 - 08:07 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 27094 battles
  • 27,749
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    09-03-2010

View Post8126Jakobsson, on 23 February 2018 - 04:49 PM, said:

Think it would be better if they pinned a complete explanation about how it works instead.

 

No, we don't nee people playing a certain way to maximise exp.

 

Plus it would need WG to figure it out first.



8126Jakobsson #8 Posted 23 February 2018 - 08:22 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 61193 battles
  • 2,591
  • Member since:
    12-20-2014

View PostHomer_J, on 23 February 2018 - 08:07 PM, said:

 

No, we don't nee people playing a certain way to maximise exp.

 

Plus it would need WG to figure it out first.

 

​But we are already playing a certain way to maximise exp. The thing is that the factors outside the score card doesn't make sense. Like I just posted in another thread:

 

Guy in IS-7 did 1548 dmg with 1 kill, 1220 assist and 0 spotted.

Me in 5A did 2160 dmg with 1 kill, 1554 assist and 1 spotted.

He's top 3 and get 2 chevrons.

I'm bottom 3 and get nothing.

Both survived.

He was closer to the bigger brawl cluster.

gg 

 

And to add to that I blocked more and shot less % of my damage from +300m. So..yeah.

 



Homer_J #9 Posted 23 February 2018 - 08:25 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 27094 battles
  • 27,749
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    09-03-2010

View Post8126Jakobsson, on 23 February 2018 - 07:22 PM, said:

 

​But we are already playing a certain way to maximise exp.

 

 

Yes but we don't need people knowing that they can score more by sitting behind a house 100m from the enemy than shooting from 150 or whatever.   Or maybe you do.

8126Jakobsson #10 Posted 23 February 2018 - 08:33 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 61193 battles
  • 2,591
  • Member since:
    12-20-2014

View PostHomer_J, on 23 February 2018 - 08:25 PM, said:

 

Yes but we don't need people knowing that they can score more by sitting behind a house 100m from the enemy than shooting from 150 or whatever.   Or maybe you do.

 

​We don't need to know as long as it makes sense. Do damage, kill tanks, get assist. You know, the common sense things. But as I showed you there is some alien voodoo going on that doesn't make sense. I like when it makes sense.

Because logic and stuff.



K_A #11 Posted 23 February 2018 - 09:19 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 13566 battles
  • 4,656
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    04-18-2013

View Post8126Jakobsson, on 23 February 2018 - 07:33 PM, said:

 

​We don't need to know as long as it makes sense. Do damage, kill tanks, get assist. You know, the common sense things. But as I showed you there is some alien voodoo going on that doesn't make sense. I like when it makes sense.

Because logic and stuff.

 

Oh c'mon don't turn this into another one of those threads... :facepalm: Just play well and you'll do well. I've played 3 games of ranked so far, twice as a top 3 winner and once as a middle of the teamlist winner, and you wanna know how I did it? 4k, 3.5k and 2.8k damage by brawling on the frontline, that's how. Git gud and stop crying about a single battle here and there.

8126Jakobsson #12 Posted 23 February 2018 - 09:50 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 61193 battles
  • 2,591
  • Member since:
    12-20-2014

View PostK_A, on 23 February 2018 - 09:19 PM, said:

 

Oh c'mon don't turn this into another one of those threads... :facepalm: Just play well and you'll do well. I've played 3 games of ranked so far, twice as a top 3 winner and once as a middle of the teamlist winner, and you wanna know how I did it? 4k, 3.5k and 2.8k damage by brawling on the frontline, that's how. Git gud and stop crying about a single battle here and there.

 

​I'll work on it. Perhaps one day I will have gotten as gud as you. 

Warhawk1984 #13 Posted 23 February 2018 - 09:59 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Clan Diplomat
  • 16258 battles
  • 54
  • [0-M-J] 0-M-J
  • Member since:
    05-18-2012

Removed


Edited by Warhawk1984, 23 February 2018 - 10:31 PM.


K_A #14 Posted 23 February 2018 - 10:37 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 13566 battles
  • 4,656
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    04-18-2013

View Post8126Jakobsson, on 23 February 2018 - 08:50 PM, said:

 

​I'll work on it. Perhaps one day I will have gotten as gud as you. 

 

That's the spirit!

 

I'll give you a tip: 

Spoiler

 







Also tagged with rankeds, sheshul, ppl

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users