Jump to content


Bots in game srsly ?

Bots

  • Please log in to reply
19 replies to this topic

Psych_Viking #1 Posted 24 February 2018 - 05:35 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 34133 battles
  • 546
  • Member since:
    03-19-2011

Hi folks just got funny think play couple battles in random with low tiers tanks and sow this players i put screenshot you will see what i mean.So don't know maybe here WG testing bots lol. So why i say they bots like a simple they sit in base when left 5 enemy tanks they start driving in enemy base so suspicion. So want you guys opinion or i need doctor :sceptic:.

And they always play with  T-127 prem tanks i don't know if they play day but night for sure. *edited*

 

 

*edited* 


Edited by NickMustaine, 26 February 2018 - 01:01 PM.
Image removed due to naming and shaming.


Rod_75 #2 Posted 24 February 2018 - 06:23 AM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 25659 battles
  • 167
  • [ORKI] ORKI
  • Member since:
    02-03-2012

Wow.

Nice screenshot.

 

If theya re BOT, should be easy to see bye performance? Maybe not.

One of them http://www.noobmeter.com/player/eu/Pee_xD/553314869/ , seems not a BOT.

Seems a player.

If so... Maybe is one person, running different accounts on the same machine and sync the battle? (In this case all bots would receive 50%wr, on long number of battles).

Or a pack of friends, clicking in the exact moment.

 

If they are AIs (bot programmed by WG) seem performing decently.

Maybe we have chance to see any PvE game mode.

 

Rod



Renesco #3 Posted 24 February 2018 - 06:25 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Beta Tester
  • 21319 battles
  • 478
  • [SOBAD] SOBAD
  • Member since:
    10-08-2010
Yep I seen them last night, and again tonight in a match I just had, there was 3 of my team and 3 on the enemy team

Psych_Viking #4 Posted 24 February 2018 - 06:25 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 34133 battles
  • 546
  • Member since:
    03-19-2011

View PostRod_75, on 24 February 2018 - 05:23 AM, said:

Wow.

Nice screenshot.

 

If theya re BOT, should be easy to see bye performance? Maybe not.

One of them http://www.noobmeter.com/player/eu/Pee_xD/553314869/ , seems not a BOT.

Seems a player.

If so... Maybe is one person, running different accounts on the same machine and sync the battle? (In this case all bots would receive 50%wr, on long number of battles).

Or a pack of friends, clicking in the exact moment.

 

If they are AIs (bot programmed by WG) seem performing decently.

Maybe we have chance to see any PvE game mode.

 

Rod

Yes i think a same 



Renesco #5 Posted 24 February 2018 - 06:31 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Beta Tester
  • 21319 battles
  • 478
  • [SOBAD] SOBAD
  • Member since:
    10-08-2010
Every match I play right now with Valentine II has a bunch of them on both teams, they're definitely not bots, I saw them take very good cover that a bot wouldn't know to take

DracheimFlug #6 Posted 24 February 2018 - 08:44 AM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 8957 battles
  • 4,033
  • Member since:
    11-13-2014

View PostRod_75, on 24 February 2018 - 06:23 AM, said:

Wow.

Nice screenshot.

 

If theya re BOT, should be easy to see bye performance? Maybe not.

One of them http://www.noobmeter.com/player/eu/Pee_xD/553314869/ , seems not a BOT.

Seems a player.

If so... Maybe is one person, running different accounts on the same machine and sync the battle? (In this case all bots would receive 50%wr, on long number of battles).

Or a pack of friends, clicking in the exact moment.

 

If they are AIs (bot programmed by WG) seem performing decently.

Maybe we have chance to see any PvE game mode.

 

Rod

 

View PostPsych_Viking, on 24 February 2018 - 06:25 AM, said:

Yes i think a same 

 

I have seen this a couple times with similar names and platooned. When platooned (similar names or not) it really is the first thing I think of since that is the only way to guarantee that they have both tanks played in the same battle. 

Pandabird #7 Posted 24 February 2018 - 08:53 AM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 33973 battles
  • 4,526
  • [KOFF] KOFF
  • Member since:
    05-19-2013
You need to add a bot detection filter to guarantee it's a bot.

An even layer of mustard on your screen should do the trick.

250swb #8 Posted 24 February 2018 - 08:54 AM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 22687 battles
  • 5,077
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    09-23-2015

WG have recently announced they were thinking about a game mode (was it an historical mode or something similar?) that used bots, so...........

 

found it, 

  • There’s a bot under development, which will play like a 48% WR potato to test tanks.

https://thearmoredpatrol.com/2018/02/23/wot-dev-conference-qa/


Edited by 250swb, 24 February 2018 - 08:57 AM.


Psych_Viking #9 Posted 24 February 2018 - 10:14 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 34133 battles
  • 546
  • Member since:
    03-19-2011

View PostPandabird, on 24 February 2018 - 07:53 AM, said:

You need to add a bot detection filter to guarantee it's a bot.

An even layer of mustard on your screen should do the trick.

 

Where i can get this ?

Psych_Viking #10 Posted 25 February 2018 - 02:01 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 34133 battles
  • 546
  • Member since:
    03-19-2011
*edited*

Edited by Daxeno, 25 February 2018 - 03:52 PM.
This post has been edited by the moderation team for discussing moderation.


Jigabachi #11 Posted 25 February 2018 - 02:17 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 17935 battles
  • 19,100
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    08-12-2011

View PostPsych_Viking, on 25 February 2018 - 02:01 PM, said:

*edited*

Let me guess: Naming and shaming?



Psych_Viking #12 Posted 25 February 2018 - 05:39 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 34133 battles
  • 546
  • Member since:
    03-19-2011
hahahah wg thanks for that so good to know how working wg lol

Isharial #13 Posted 25 February 2018 - 05:40 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 19841 battles
  • 2,352
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    12-19-2015

View PostPsych_Viking, on 24 February 2018 - 10:14 AM, said:

 

Where i can get this ?

 

try your local corner shop

Psych_Viking #14 Posted 25 February 2018 - 05:49 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 34133 battles
  • 546
  • Member since:
    03-19-2011

View PostIsharial, on 25 February 2018 - 04:40 PM, said:

 

try your local corner shop

 

:confused:

Psych_Viking #15 Posted 25 February 2018 - 07:02 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 34133 battles
  • 546
  • Member since:
    03-19-2011

Edited .:trollface:

 

This post has been edited by the moderation team due to impersonating a member of the staff.

 

 


Edited by VMX, 26 February 2018 - 03:34 PM.


Psych_Viking #16 Posted 26 February 2018 - 05:13 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 34133 battles
  • 546
  • Member since:
    03-19-2011

Start baning bot in game but why better give me warning how funny u are moderators in forum ?

But wait no bots no cheats in this game ? ohh srsly i am wrong :sceptic:


Edited by Psych_Viking, 26 February 2018 - 05:15 PM.


Laur_Balaur_XD #17 Posted 26 February 2018 - 05:17 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 35899 battles
  • 640
  • [FUSED] FUSED
  • Member since:
    04-20-2011

View PostPsych_Viking, on 26 February 2018 - 04:13 PM, said:

Start baning bot in game but why better give me warning how funny u are moderators in forum ?

But wait no bots no cheats in this game ? ohh srsly i am wrong :sceptic:

 

Yeah, it is funny to see that people who tell a simple truth are punished, but bots and cheaters are not....

Balc0ra #18 Posted 26 February 2018 - 05:22 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 66299 battles
  • 16,328
  • [WALL] WALL
  • Member since:
    07-10-2012

View PostIulian_ro, on 26 February 2018 - 05:17 PM, said:

 

Yeah, it is funny to see that people who tell a simple truth are punished, but bots and cheaters are not....

 

I've yet to see evidence from you lot they have not either. But then again a bot these days is anyone doing less damage then they did. So who knows. And since OP pointed out the T-127. I suspect he expects them to carry his tier 3 when he plays tier 2 and 3. That everyone is as awesome as he is with 34K games. If not... bot. As bot don't mean the same as it did back in 2012/13 when WG did ban thousands of them a day, and we saw 4 idle Lowe's in each tier 8 game farming credits since there was no idle system to punish them. And way point bots were clear as day in every single game we played. It's far from that today is it? As you have been around since 2011, you know how bad tier 8 was back then vs now.

 

Tho if you go by the bot forums. There are more then enough topics about ppl having their accounts banned. As they violated the game rules. Tho mostly because the idle system that' in place now. As low tiers do still have a few of them. OP violated the forum rules. Not really the same is it?


Edited by Balc0ra, 26 February 2018 - 05:27 PM.


TacticusMK2 #19 Posted 26 February 2018 - 05:25 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 16902 battles
  • 632
  • [DUAL] DUAL
  • Member since:
    02-09-2014

I dont really understand the naming and shaming bull when it's about calling out cheaters/bots. 

 

On the other hand you seem to be allowed to say "An Type 4 Heavy in my team was cheating" and then post a link to the replay on wotreplay. Where everyone can check out it's name! ;) Or this prohibited as well?



Jigabachi #20 Posted 26 February 2018 - 08:54 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 17935 battles
  • 19,100
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    08-12-2011

View PostTacticusMK2, on 26 February 2018 - 05:25 PM, said:

I dont really understand the naming and shaming bull when it's about calling out cheaters/bots.

"TacticusMK2 is a cheater and he also pets sleeping cats against the fur. Twist his tank's nipples when you see him."

 

Keeping random idio... players from claiming nonsense about other people is a good thing, but the (Russian) way the rule is set up, it suppresses ANY kind of talk about things like that. Which is stupid indeed. Especially when the mods don't even bother to actually post something after editing stuff. After all, OP posted something that they should be quite interested in, as it shows something that could be a massive infringement of the gamerules.

But hey, it isn't new that moderation is very bad here... to say the least.





Also tagged with Bots

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users