Jump to content


Historic WG faliure with Crapkanonecrappanzer


  • Please log in to reply
10 replies to this topic

_Davidge_ #1 Posted 24 February 2018 - 04:28 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 11979 battles
  • 1,964
  • Member since:
    03-20-2015

Crapcanonacrappanzer is probably biggest WG faliure ever considering a premium tank, taking into a count it is an "elite"(costly) tier VIII premium tank and  absolutely failed their cuistommers with it.

 

this is the tank.

 

tank has also became victim of current MM which has put all already barely playable tier VIII tanks into cathegory of not playable.

 

Despite endless response from playerbase and clear statistic data(Win Ratio of around 43-44 % ) Wargaming is deliberately not reacting to this sad situation, having in practice counter-playable( playable with harm for the owner) tier VIII premium tank in their game.

 

Any idea what would be conequences of such neglection or is this the sign WG has lost   control over the state of their game?


Edited by Wayward_Current, 24 February 2018 - 05:52 PM.


SoupFork #2 Posted 24 February 2018 - 04:39 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 6157 battles
  • 235
  • Member since:
    11-07-2017

View PostWayward_Current, on 24 February 2018 - 04:28 PM, said:

...Despite endless response from playerbase and clear statistic data(Win Ratio of around 43-44 % lately) Wargaming is deliberately not reacting...

 

Oh, but they ARE reacting by offering the Skorpion G for sale again :trollface:

Edited by SoupFork, 24 February 2018 - 04:40 PM.


divsmo #3 Posted 24 February 2018 - 04:52 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 33330 battles
  • 247
  • [BEXF] BEXF
  • Member since:
    07-08-2012
Why buy it in the first place? Iirc wasn't it pretty poor even when it was released? Just add it to the list of premium tanks in need of buffs with the cdc etc :P

Balc0ra #4 Posted 24 February 2018 - 04:53 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 67385 battles
  • 17,105
  • [WALL] WALL
  • Member since:
    07-10-2012
So what happened to the 105mm gun they wanted to toss on it instead? As the test version of that is still in the client. 350 less dpm. But 150 more alpha and 30 more pen pr shot, 150 more hit points and more power to weight.

Karasu_Hidesuke #5 Posted 24 February 2018 - 04:59 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 16170 battles
  • 3,999
  • [I-S-L] I-S-L
  • Member since:
    12-03-2013
But I thought it carries the official qpranger seal of approval?..

K_A #6 Posted 24 February 2018 - 05:18 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 13660 battles
  • 4,665
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    04-18-2013

View PostBalc0ra, on 24 February 2018 - 03:53 PM, said:

So what happened to the 105mm gun they wanted to toss on it instead? As the test version of that is still in the client. 350 less dpm. But 150 more alpha and 30 more pen pr shot, 150 more hit points and more power to weight.

 

IIRC that was a supertest thing. So it can be a thing, just needs more testing and refining and a way to implement into the game.

_Davidge_ #7 Posted 24 February 2018 - 05:49 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 11979 battles
  • 1,964
  • Member since:
    03-20-2015

View Postdivsmo, on 24 February 2018 - 04:52 PM, said:

Why buy it in the first place? Iirc wasn't it pretty poor even when it was released? Just add it to the list of premium tanks in need of buffs with the cdc etc :P

 

There are some of us who bought it in a first batch, while K&K was  not realy known, with  "Quckifingers" reviews demonstrating he can make some damage in it using chocolate in Tier VIII battle against fine proportion of newbs...like really.

 

In the meantime patches happened, numerous, MM changes, game meta changes, also  Defenders, Frenchies, Japan tanks, Swedish (OMG its insult to compare!) STRV-s, and this one stayed  same, behind, plus a Scorp G.

 

its not some 10 euro tier IV premium, or give-away premium, its tier VIII 40 euro premium that does not work.

 

 


Edited by Wayward_Current, 24 February 2018 - 06:01 PM.


Tinbawx #8 Posted 24 February 2018 - 06:46 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 14747 battles
  • 1,251
  • [SNOB] SNOB
  • Member since:
    01-31-2011

View PostBalc0ra, on 24 February 2018 - 04:53 PM, said:

So what happened to the 105mm gun they wanted to toss on it instead? As the test version of that is still in the client. 350 less dpm. But 150 more alpha and 30 more pen pr shot, 150 more hit points and more power to weight.

 

Would be OP then. Kanonesh*tpanzer is probably also good at sniping things @600m.....

HaZardeur #9 Posted 24 February 2018 - 06:52 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Beta Tester
  • 34549 battles
  • 1,277
  • Member since:
    08-14-2010

View PostWayward_Current, on 24 February 2018 - 05:49 PM, said:

 

with  "Quckifingers" reviews demonstrating he can make some damage in it using chocolate in Tier VIII battle against fine proportion of newbs...like really.

 

 

 

He also said that the Defender & 268 v4 is not OP... and you really trust his unbiased and totally not by WG Shekels influenced opinion... ok :great:



vasilinhorulezz #10 Posted 24 February 2018 - 06:54 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 22813 battles
  • 1,109
  • Member since:
    09-26-2014

I'm sure it was supposed to get an 105mm gun at some point,

don't know if it will actually happen, and if yes, when.



WindSplitter1 #11 Posted 24 February 2018 - 07:03 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 16614 battles
  • 2,573
  • [ORDEM] ORDEM
  • Member since:
    02-07-2016

View PostHaZardeur, on 24 February 2018 - 05:52 PM, said:

 

He also said that the Defender & 268 v4 is not OP... and you really trust his unbiased and totally not by WG Shekels influenced opinion... ok :great:

 

V4 rammed my Death Star to death from 10m

 

On the other hand, I would totally buy this vehicle. I like German Premium Tank Destroyers. But I'll wait for supertest conclusions first.






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users