Jump to content


alternative MM


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
6 replies to this topic

_Anarchistic_ #1 Posted 27 February 2018 - 11:36 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 36488 battles
  • 1,081
  • Member since:
    01-07-2015

I have watched many threads and streamers about MM, never going to win but I just wondered about this

 

some say +/- 1 tier

others 5/10 priority, then same tier then 3/5/7

 

how about abandon the template and go

 

+/- 1 tier first then same tier then +/- 2 tier but no template of types?

 

just chucking it out there and if I am repeating anyone my apologies


Edited by _Anarchistic_, 27 February 2018 - 01:10 PM.


doriansky1 #2 Posted 27 February 2018 - 11:54 AM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 27141 battles
  • 182
  • [SKIL1] SKIL1
  • Member since:
    12-14-2015

Fellow baboon, here is my opinion :

 

+1/-1 MM will advantage the unicum/superunicum players, since in most battles they will be top tier, so their win ratio will easily go >70%. At the same time, there will be players with <40% WR. However I personally think this is by far the best MM, at least the most interesting games i played were with 5/10 MM.

3/5/7 is problematic simply because if those 3 in your team don't realize they simply have to press that W in order to win...then it's GG. I think it's very clear what i'm trying to explain (for example T110E3 camping the base when half of the enemy team is composed of IS-3, Tiger II, Indian Panzer , etc). Meanwhile, the 268v4 in the enemy team is laughing.

 

Overall, the current MM is much much better compared with what we used to have 2 years ago for example.

 

One last thing, i played a game with Obj.140  in a 2-4-9 MM. It was glorious :D

 

 

 

 



Dava_117 #3 Posted 27 February 2018 - 12:30 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 18538 battles
  • 2,739
  • [B-BAS] B-BAS
  • Member since:
    12-17-2014
IMO, the best MM ever was the first iteration of template MM. No priority to 3/5/7, so lot's of single tier and 2 tier battle.

Homer_J #4 Posted 27 February 2018 - 01:25 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 27652 battles
  • 29,000
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    09-03-2010

View Post_Anarchistic_, on 27 February 2018 - 10:36 AM, said:

 

how about abandon the template and go

 

+/- 1 tier first then same tier then +/- 2 tier but no template of types?

 

How about abandon the templates and accept that being the only bottom tier in a battle is the price you pay for your share of being top tier.



_Anarchistic_ #5 Posted 27 February 2018 - 01:30 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 36488 battles
  • 1,081
  • Member since:
    01-07-2015

View PostHomer_J, on 27 February 2018 - 01:25 PM, said:

How about abandon the templates and accept that being the only bottom tier in a battle is the price you pay for your share of being top tier.

 

​been there, actually made the game easy, I knew I was pure support.  In itself MM never been something I worried about too much as long as I get even amounts of top, middle or bottom tier.   now the complaint seems to be tier 8 always bottom tier hence why I thought this might be an idea worth at least a kick a bout

malachi6 #6 Posted 27 February 2018 - 03:49 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 49222 battles
  • 3,235
  • Member since:
    04-14-2011
As long as you are mainly top tier right?  Otherwise the system is clearly broken and needs fixing?
 

Asklepi0s #7 Posted 27 February 2018 - 07:23 PM

    Moderator

  • Moderator
  • 5720 battles
  • 839
  • [WG_M] WG_M
  • Member since:
    01-23-2017
Due to the high number of Match Making, we want discussions to take place in the main pinned thread here.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users