Jump to content


Who want to get Obj907 with bond?

Please tick poll.

  • Please log in to reply
112 replies to this topic

Poll: Who want to get Obj907 with bond? (199 members have cast votes)

You have to complete 250 battles in order to participate this poll.

Who want to get Obj907 with bond?

  1. Yes please wargaming let me. (128 votes [64.32%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 64.32%

  2. No wargaming continue award system. (71 votes [35.68%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 35.68%

Vote Hide poll

BerkOsman #1 Posted 01 March 2018 - 12:44 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 72061 battles
  • 241
  • [_57_] _57_
  • Member since:
    07-26-2012
İ wish to get award tank with bonds. For example Obj907. Many players want to get that. But Clans choose 10 players to get it at world war. Why wargaming prohibit award tanks other regular players? Wargaming must let to get Obj 907 as reward for single players with bond. For example Obj907= 50.000bond. Thanks. in addition please resell defender 

TankkiPoju #2 Posted 01 March 2018 - 12:46 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 20985 battles
  • 6,389
  • [-PJ-] -PJ-
  • Member since:
    05-20-2011
I voted Yes just for the lulz.

Element6 #3 Posted 01 March 2018 - 12:52 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 29798 battles
  • 10,394
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    01-06-2013
With the likely bond pricetag being several times that of one improved equipment, I'd be looking at getting such a tank with this currency sometime around 2022. If it was important to me I would probably try and get it the same way everyone else has.

PoIestar #4 Posted 01 March 2018 - 01:02 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 32086 battles
  • 4,153
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    05-02-2013
Yeah, let's make it more likely to encounter one of these totally balanced tanks. It's impossible to hurt the game balance more anyway.

fwhaatpiraat #5 Posted 01 March 2018 - 01:08 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 49163 battles
  • 841
  • [RGT] RGT
  • Member since:
    05-04-2013
What part of 'reward' don't you understand?

Element6 #6 Posted 01 March 2018 - 01:10 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 29798 battles
  • 10,394
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    01-06-2013

View Postfwhaatpiraat, on 01 March 2018 - 01:08 PM, said:

What part of 'reward' don't you understand?

Some people might have learned from "Mutant will never be sold again"...



Jethro_Grey #7 Posted 01 March 2018 - 01:11 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 4304 battles
  • 534
  • [KAIN] KAIN
  • Member since:
    08-01-2015
If it is OP, i want in on that gig.

fwhaatpiraat #8 Posted 01 March 2018 - 01:13 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 49163 battles
  • 841
  • [RGT] RGT
  • Member since:
    05-04-2013

View PostElement6_TheSprout, on 01 March 2018 - 01:10 PM, said:

Some people might have learned from "Mutant will never be sold again"...

 

"We are not greedy".

Soifon99 #9 Posted 01 March 2018 - 01:13 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 36865 battles
  • 402
  • [KITTY] KITTY
  • Member since:
    01-21-2013

No, earn it with clanwars.. stay away from our nice tank :)

 

they  can give away other tanks, that's fine. (non clan war tanks)

 

And war gaming doesn't have to do anything.. people who cry about the 907 are usually jealous children that want the tank for them self but because they can't they cry wolf.. 

War gaming should not reward the no lifers... i have played around 50 battles in ranked and im at rank 11, but i see ALOT of people who suck hard in ranked but have no life and just play a million games.. and are also at rank 11..  so no.. rewarding no life players should not be done.


Edited by Soifon99, 01 March 2018 - 01:26 PM.


leggasiini #10 Posted 01 March 2018 - 01:15 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 15163 battles
  • 6,236
  • [-GLO-] -GLO-
  • Member since:
    12-01-2012
no

Dava_117 #11 Posted 01 March 2018 - 01:19 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 20196 battles
  • 3,627
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    12-17-2014

Yes, just for fun! :teethhappy:

(I will never get 50K bonds)

 

BTW

1) WG announced they're thinking to introduce bonds tanks

2) Defender should never be sold again! Never!



TheWarrener #12 Posted 01 March 2018 - 01:27 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 3754 battles
  • 355
  • Member since:
    10-31-2017
Yep, 50k is a reasonable price. After 1500 games I earned 500, so I'll be there in a moment.

Archaean #13 Posted 01 March 2018 - 01:27 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 15591 battles
  • 1,204
  • [S4LT] S4LT
  • Member since:
    04-25-2015

View PostDava_117, on 01 March 2018 - 01:19 PM, said:

 

2) Defender should never be sold again! Never!

Does it even matter now? Wargaming is going for the armor meta apparently so if they slowly change the tanks to be stronger introducing a Defender won't change a lot.
 

Even now Defender is only OP if it's top tier. As soon as it gets some nice new balanced t9/t10 tanks it doesn't look too special anymore.



Szatanshow #14 Posted 01 March 2018 - 01:27 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 24821 battles
  • 358
  • Member since:
    01-14-2013
Just what we need more broken tanks flooding every game

Edited by Szatanshow, 01 March 2018 - 01:29 PM.


TheWarrener #15 Posted 01 March 2018 - 01:32 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 3754 battles
  • 355
  • Member since:
    10-31-2017

View PostArchaean, on 01 March 2018 - 01:27 PM, said:

Does it even matter now? Wargaming is going for the armor meta apparently so if they slowly change the tanks to be stronger introducing a Defender won't change a lot.
 

Even now Defender is only OP if it's top tier. As soon as it gets some nice new balanced t9/t10 tanks it doesn't look too special anymore.

 

Da, blyat, I heard you cried about defender being OP when fighting lower tiers so we made all tier 8 tanks unable to see lower tiers! Pass me some more vodka, da

RamRaid90 #16 Posted 01 March 2018 - 01:37 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 22415 battles
  • 6,674
  • [D0NG] D0NG
  • Member since:
    12-14-2014

Translation:

 

Iz rally bad so plez gives me OP tank so iz kan b unicum.



TheWarrener #17 Posted 01 March 2018 - 01:38 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 3754 battles
  • 355
  • Member since:
    10-31-2017

View PostRamRaid90, on 01 March 2018 - 01:37 PM, said:

Translation:

 

Iz rally bad so plez gives me OP tank so iz kan b unicum.

 

Dz et came wit ful geld lodout zo iz ken be unicum sum morE

Element6 #18 Posted 01 March 2018 - 01:55 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 29798 battles
  • 10,394
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    01-06-2013

View Postfwhaatpiraat, on 01 March 2018 - 01:13 PM, said:

"We are not greedy".

Well, as for the Mutant I think it mostly revolved around the very problematic issue of predicting the future. When they released the game I doubt any of the people at WG dared dream how big and successful the game would become. Not only that, but with such a promise, and the longevity of the product, there is the issue of only very old accounts owning a tank, making it at a point in time one of the rarest sights on the battlefield. If most of these accounts today were inactives it would for all intents and purposes be a placeholder tank that "nobody" ever saw, as such a tank with no purpose whatsoever. From the developer's point of view it is pointless to have a tank in the game that causes a sensation whenever it is seen on the battlefield.

 

I'm quite positive they had full control of how many Mutants were on inactive accounts, and figured it was better to sell the tank again despite their age old promise, because they would actually only be breaking that promise to a select few players in total. I very much doubt they put it in the shop again out of greed.



Dava_117 #19 Posted 01 March 2018 - 02:33 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 20196 battles
  • 3,627
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    12-17-2014

View PostArchaean, on 01 March 2018 - 01:27 PM, said:

Does it even matter now? Wargaming is going for the armor meta apparently so if they slowly change the tanks to be stronger introducing a Defender won't change a lot.
 

Even now Defender is only OP if it's top tier. As soon as it gets some nice new balanced t9/t10 tanks it doesn't look too special anymore.

 

It still count. Seeing mistly higher tier doesn't reduce OPness, cause also all the other tier 8 are in the same situation. 

arthurwellsley #20 Posted 01 March 2018 - 02:43 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 52114 battles
  • 3,181
  • [-B-C-] -B-C-
  • Member since:
    05-11-2011

View PostBerkOsman, on 01 March 2018 - 11:44 AM, said:

İ wish to get award tank with bonds. For example Obj907. Many players want to get that. But Clans choose 10 players to get it at world war. Why wargaming prohibit award tanks other regular players? Wargaming must let to get Obj 907 as reward for single players with bond. For example Obj907= 50.000bond. Thanks. in addition please resell defender 

 

1. Playing CW to gain a tier X tank is a huge commitment. During the campaign players who (a) want the tank, and (b) need their clan to do well, must play virtually every evening of the campaign for three hours per evening at leat six out of seven nights for about three weeks. No one will bother with that level of commitment unless the rewards are unique. So selling CW reward tanks for bonds looks like a slap in the face to CW players who put in the commitment and effort. The issue is more that the other CW reward tanks although unique are somewhat lacklustre (looks at 121B in particular), while the Object 907 got massively overbuffed when it went into HD. The answer is to nerf the 907 back to where it was before the HD model.

 

2. No the Defender/Object 252U should never be re-sold on EU servers. Let the damn thing die.


Edited by arthurwellsley, 01 March 2018 - 07:22 PM.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users