Jump to content


A new Q&A from armored patrol


  • Please log in to reply
109 replies to this topic

LordMuffin #1 Posted 03 March 2018 - 06:23 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 48074 battles
  • 10,838
  • [-GLO-] -GLO-
  • Member since:
    06-21-2011

link https://thearmoredpa...018/#more-63230

 

One of the highlights

 

Q: How is the Obj. 268 V4 doing?
A: There are a lot of voices, both good and bad, but that means that the tank is balanced. A nerf is improbable, but a buff very possible.

 

another

Q: What’s the reason for “flattening” most of the maps?
A: It might seem like that because some light and shadow interactions, but the maps are balanced. In the new patch, we made them so that the inclines are identical on both sides, but because of the new lighting systems, it looks otherwise. Some places were indeed flattened, because we found that some places were giving tanks with mediocre depression a disadvantage.

 

 

Have fun reading the rest. These q&a always brings me a smile. 



Dex022 #2 Posted 03 March 2018 - 06:30 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 38389 battles
  • 1,622
  • Member since:
    12-26-2011
Just like we discussed in topic about maps flattening....another indirect rashaaaa buff comrade. Well i come back to game after long time,play 1000 battles in 30 days and after 9.22 and incoming 1.0 bs i again stopped playing almost 20 days now. Seems it will stay like that. This time maybe permanent. No point in playing nothing except ru ufo's and i really don't like them so....

Sfinski #3 Posted 03 March 2018 - 06:34 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 30928 battles
  • 2,358
  • [-PJ-] -PJ-
  • Member since:
    09-26-2013
WG devs are [edited] -> mentally defective, short and simple. 

Edited by Sfinski, 03 March 2018 - 06:41 PM.


brumbarr #4 Posted 03 March 2018 - 06:37 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 38626 battles
  • 6,326
  • Member since:
    07-30-2012
The fact that they think the 268 is balanced  is beyond words, how can they be this stupid?

SovietBias #5 Posted 03 March 2018 - 06:38 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 37224 battles
  • 1,258
  • Member since:
    06-10-2013

I figure the Financial dep. found out not enough people free xp'ed to Obj.268 V4. Conveniently, this weekend there's a special that will get you sorted!

 


Edited by SovietBias, 03 March 2018 - 06:44 PM.


MarcoStrapone #6 Posted 03 March 2018 - 06:39 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 34057 battles
  • 712
  • [-GODS] -GODS
  • Member since:
    08-11-2013
and you believe to words coming out from drunks.

Edited by MarcoStrapone, 03 March 2018 - 06:39 PM.


Element6_TheSprout #7 Posted 03 March 2018 - 06:41 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 29043 battles
  • 10,342
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    01-06-2013

View PostDex022, on 03 March 2018 - 06:30 PM, said:

Just like we discussed in topic about maps flattening....another indirect rashaaaa buff comrade. Well i come back to game after long time,play 1000 battles in 30 days and after 9.22 and incoming 1.0 bs i again stopped playing almost 20 days now. Seems it will stay like that. This time maybe permanent. No point in playing nothing except ru ufo's and i really don't like them so....

Since there seems to be more than one indirect buffing of RU tanks, does this show in the statistics of the tanks anywhere?



JocMeister #8 Posted 03 March 2018 - 06:43 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 21759 battles
  • 1,866
  • [-MM] -MM
  • Member since:
    08-03-2015

They are actually considering BUFFING the 268.4?... The stupidity of the WG balancing department is just...beyond comprehension.



Roudari #9 Posted 03 March 2018 - 06:44 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 34101 battles
  • 722
  • Member since:
    01-28-2011
And dont forget that they are going to remove pref MM from premium tanks.. Good luck TOGII in tier 8 battles and KV-5 in tier X battles. :P

Igor_BL #10 Posted 03 March 2018 - 06:49 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 37431 battles
  • 1,162
  • Member since:
    06-10-2015
HAHAHAHAHA!

Snake_Keeper #11 Posted 03 March 2018 - 06:51 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 8568 battles
  • 697
  • Member since:
    02-04-2016
Investing in this game seems to have been an grave error. At this rate you might as well say there are only the Russian, and Swedish tech tree in the game.

Element6_TheSprout #12 Posted 03 March 2018 - 06:51 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 29043 battles
  • 10,342
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    01-06-2013

"We're trying to fight the anti-bot system"

 

Either vodka, or stronk translation.



LordMuffin #13 Posted 03 March 2018 - 06:53 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 48074 battles
  • 10,838
  • [-GLO-] -GLO-
  • Member since:
    06-21-2011

View PostCrazyTracks, on 03 March 2018 - 06:44 PM, said:

And dont forget that they are going to remove pref MM from premium tanks.. Good luck TOGII in tier 8 battles and KV-5 in tier X battles. :P

Forgot the TOG. ...

How the [edited]are they going to buff that so it becomes viable against T8 without utterly demolishing T6 tanks?



Sfinski #14 Posted 03 March 2018 - 06:54 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 30928 battles
  • 2,358
  • [-PJ-] -PJ-
  • Member since:
    09-26-2013
How about giving it a turret? Buff the dpm a bit, like Badger level or so, nothing crazy of course. Traverse and overall mobility could be around T-100 lt so it can chase lights. Maybe huge strap-on in the front of it which it can ram up every other tanks arse, which it is basically doing already figuratively. 

smokeytheband1t #15 Posted 03 March 2018 - 06:56 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 8454 battles
  • 58
  • Member since:
    12-05-2016
Type 5 also needs buffs i can still pen it with my T95 WG

MeNoobTank #16 Posted 03 March 2018 - 06:59 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 10430 battles
  • 313
  • [R3L4X] R3L4X
  • Member since:
    02-16-2017

View PostSfinski, on 03 March 2018 - 06:54 PM, said:

How about giving it a turret? Buff the dpm a bit, like Badger level or so, nothing crazy of course. Traverse and overall mobility could be around T-100 lt so it can chase lights. Maybe huge strap-on in the front of it which it can ram up every other tanks arse, which it is basically doing already figuratively. 

 

+1

 

btw that turret needs to be the one from obj 705’s test server. The one fully red with 300+ mm everywhere



kinskikl4us #17 Posted 03 March 2018 - 06:59 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 8276 battles
  • 60
  • [RDEE] RDEE
  • Member since:
    02-10-2011

View PostLordMuffin, on 03 March 2018 - 05:23 PM, said:

link https://thearmoredpa...018/#more-63230

 

One of the highlights

 

Q: How is the Obj. 268 V4 doing?
A: There are a lot of voices, both good and bad, but that means that the tank is balanced. A nerf is improbable, but a buff very possible.

 

another

Q: What’s the reason for “flattening” most of the maps?
A: It might seem like that because some light and shadow interactions, but the maps are balanced. In the new patch, we made them so that the inclines are identical on both sides, but because of the new lighting systems, it looks otherwise. Some places were indeed flattened, because we found that some places were giving tanks with mediocre depression a disadvantage.

 

 

Have fun reading the rest. These q&a always brings me a smile. 

 

 

I miss Serb. T'was a better time.



Simeon85 #18 Posted 03 March 2018 - 07:03 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 1097 battles
  • 2,297
  • Member since:
    04-19-2013

The only thing that saves the first comment is it's a translation fail, otherwise it is the single most stupid thing ever said by someone from WG.

 

The second is clear evidence of Russian tank bias and makes you wonder what the point of gun depression is as a balancing stat.  The only thing tanks like the Cent AX, STB-1, Leo etc. had over Russian meds was being able to work more areas because of good gun depression. 



uglycousin #19 Posted 03 March 2018 - 07:08 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 43179 battles
  • 3,540
  • [TFUK] TFUK
  • Member since:
    09-01-2014

View Postbrumbarr, on 03 March 2018 - 07:37 PM, said:

The fact that they think the 268 is balanced  is beyond words, how can they be this stupid?

 

Thinking about buffing it? That seems even more stupid.

Igor_BL #20 Posted 03 March 2018 - 07:12 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 37431 battles
  • 1,162
  • Member since:
    06-10-2015
I was planning to start pading dmg in 268v4 before they nerf it to the ground... but meaby i should wait for the buff.. not sure...




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users