Jump to content


Object 268.4 buff?


  • Please log in to reply
8 replies to this topic

spark82 #1 Posted 03 March 2018 - 08:21 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 36250 battles
  • 45
  • [BBMM] BBMM
  • Member since:
    04-27-2011

"Q: How is the Obj. 268 V4 doing?
A: There are a lot of voices, both good and bad, but that means that the tank is balanced. A nerf is improbable, but a buff very possible."

I can't even.



spark82 #2 Posted 03 March 2018 - 08:23 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 36250 battles
  • 45
  • [BBMM] BBMM
  • Member since:
    04-27-2011
https://thearmoredpa...eam-02-03-2018/

Balc0ra #3 Posted 03 March 2018 - 08:41 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 65810 battles
  • 16,038
  • [WALL] WALL
  • Member since:
    07-10-2012

Keep in mind that buffs are mostly decided by how it preforms on RU vs EU.

 

EU has 24 000, it's the least "popular" tier X in terms of population. So most tomatoes have yet to get it to drag it down as they are grinding the line based on hype. Because the SU-101 has doubled in population this patch. So they are grinding up it I'm sure. As it's still mostly played by good players, the WR on it is still high. As we see on most CW tanks etc. As the old 263 was not big in terms of population either for many to get it early vs the T-10 and the swap there.  As that's the reason for the changes to name one. As it was the least popular line in the game.

 

It sits on a 55.9% WR on EU, and 54.34% WR on RU with a 10x higher population. So I find it odd they would consider a buff this early even based on those numbers even before the tomato horde gets to it.



shikaka9 #4 Posted 03 March 2018 - 08:42 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 58794 battles
  • 164
  • [VTIP] VTIP
  • Member since:
    02-27-2013
if it is buff like they did to amx ac 48 then its ok

Junglist_ #5 Posted 03 March 2018 - 08:48 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 36653 battles
  • 1,344
  • Member since:
    06-17-2013

 

That's gotta be a joke



MaxxyNL #6 Posted 03 March 2018 - 08:48 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 11349 battles
  • 977
  • Member since:
    04-05-2013
WG has activated the self destruct function of their own game? :bush:

Shivva #7 Posted 03 March 2018 - 08:59 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 29759 battles
  • 1,958
  • [J_A_G] J_A_G
  • Member since:
    05-20-2012

View Postspark82, on 03 March 2018 - 07:21 PM, said:

"Q: How is the Obj. 268 V4 doing?
A: There are a lot of voices, both good and bad, but that means that the tank is balanced. A nerf is improbable, but a buff very possible."

I can't even.

 

I'm surprised you were able to read it....since you can't read front page of the forums. http://forum.worldof...armored-patrol/

unrealname #8 Posted 04 March 2018 - 12:32 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 21905 battles
  • 1,014
  • Member since:
    10-31-2013

they can do whatever they want with it, im not going to grind that BS td anyway :d same as im not going to grind for that slow pos 705A(best part is that you need 100k xp on is-m for modules and another 144k to get 705), pz7 is enough for me already :D

anyway, 268/4 needs mobility nerf, top speed shouldnt exceed 40-45, backwards maximum 12-15, 20 is just ridiculous.



HaZardeur #9 Posted 04 March 2018 - 01:00 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Beta Tester
  • 33257 battles
  • 1,175
  • Member since:
    08-14-2010
Most likely the "Shekel to free XP" ratio wasnt high enough after release ? :coin::coin::coin:




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users